ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: While electrochemotherapy (ECT) is increasingly utilized as a highly effective method in the treatment of tumors in the head and neck region, there is significantly less data available for eyelid-periocular skin tumors. Our group reported the first extensive case series of eyelid-periocular basal cell carcinoma (BCC) patients with short-term follow-up treatment with ECT. The present study aims to report our long-term results of eyelid-periocular BCC cases treated with ECT. METHODS: The treatments were performed according to the ESOPE (European Standard Operating Procedures on Electrochemotherapy) guidelines using the Cliniporator™ device. All patients received bleomycin-based ECT, administered intratumorally or intravenously. Tumor response was evaluated using the RECIST 1.1 criteria. RESULTS: The results of 19 patients treated with ECT are presented. Four patients had locally advanced primary tumors, while 15 patients had recurrent tumors. Bleomycin was administered intratumorally in four patients and intravenously in 15 patients. The overall response was 100%, while the complete response rate proved to be 95%. In three cases (15.8%), recurrence was observed during the mean follow-up period of 78.9 months. CONCLUSIONS: ECT can effectively treat locally advanced or recurrent BCC in the eyelid-periocular skin region. Excellent tumor control can be achieved with good functional and cosmetic results without systemic adverse events with long interval follow-up.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Conjunctival naevi are the most frequently diagnosed primary melanocytic lesions of the conjunctiva. The clinical manifestations are greatly variable which may result in diagnostic difficulties and differential diagnostic confusions. Therefore aims of the present study were: 1) to assess the morphologic features of conjunctival naevi; 2) to delineate the anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) characteristics of these lesions; 3) to compare AS-OCT and ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) as diagnostic tools in these alterations and 4) to correlate histological results with the AS-OCT pictures in case of surgically excised naevi. METHODS: All lesions were photo-documented. AS-OCT and UBM (over the age of 18 years) were performed. Surgically excised lesions were admitted to histological examinations. RESULTS: In our series of 57 conjunctival naevi, 54.4% were highly pigmented, 15.8% proved to be amelanotic. AS-OCT could detect intralesional cysts in 61.4% of the naevi, while slit-lamp and UBM proved to be less sensitive (40.3% vs. 28.5%). UBM could visualize the posterior margins of all naevi, while AS-OCT proved to be less sensitive with the detection of 89.4% of posterior naevus margins. Thickness of the conjunctival epithelial layer could be measured with AS-OCT in case of subepithelial naevi, while no distinct epithelial layer could be detected in compound and junctional naevi. CONCLUSIONS: Superiority of AS-OCT over UBM was demonstrated in visualizing internal structures of conjunctival naevi. UBM proved to be a better tool in highly pigmented and remarkably elevated naevi. Correlation was found between the histological type of the naevus and the thickness of the epithelial layer covering the lesion.
