Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Med Ultrason ; 16(1): 21-6, 2014 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24567920

ABSTRACT

AIM: To evaluate female runners' pelvic floor muscles using three-dimensional ultrasonography (3DUS) and surface electromyography (SEMG). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 24 female runners. SEMG was performed using surface electrodes inserted in the vagina. 3DUS was performed using perineal convex transducer. SEMG was evaluated at rest and with maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) and slow contraction. Levator ani muscle thickness, levator hiatus area and the angle between the levator muscles at rest and with MVC and Valsalva were evaluated using 3DUS. The women were divided into two groups (women running 25 km/week). Means, standard deviations and non-paired t tests were used for both groups. RESULTS: Among the 24 women, 11 ran 25 km/week (40.77 +/- 1.15 km/week). The mean SEMG at rest and with MVC and slow contraction were 16.25, 65.86 and 71.41 mV, respectively. For the levator hiatus area at rest and with MVC and Valsalva, the means were 12.54, 10.06 and 16.57 sqcm, respectively. Correlations between 3DUS and SEMG showed significant differences in SEMG at rest and levator thickness with Valsalva (r = 0.46; p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: 3DUS and SEMG are two feasible methods for evaluating female runners' pelvic floor. Correlations between 3DUS and SEMG showed significant differences in SEMG at rest and levator thickness with Valsalva.


Subject(s)
Electromyography/methods , Imaging, Three-Dimensional/methods , Muscle, Skeletal/diagnostic imaging , Muscle, Skeletal/physiology , Pelvic Floor/physiology , Running/physiology , Ultrasonography/methods , Adult , Female , Humans , Isometric Contraction/physiology , Middle Aged , Muscle Strength/physiology , Pelvic Floor/diagnostic imaging , Physical Endurance/physiology , Pilot Projects , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...