A controlled clinical trial of bupropion for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in adults.

OBJECTIVE: Despite the increasing recognition of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in adults, there is a paucity of controlled pharmacological trials demonstrating the effectiveness of compounds used in treatment, particularly nonstimulants. The authors report results from a controlled investigation to determine the anti-ADHD efficacy of bupropion in adult patients with DSM-IV ADHD. METHOD: This was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, parallel, 6-week trial comparing patients receiving sustained-release bupropion (up to 200 mg b.i.d.) (N=21) to patients receiving placebo (N=19). The authors used standardized structured psychiatric instruments for diagnosis of ADHD. To measure improvement, they used separate assessments of ADHD, depression, and anxiety symptoms at baseline and each weekly visit. RESULTS: Of the 40 subjects (55% male) enrolled in the study, 38 completed the study. Bupropion treatment was associated with a significant change in ADHD symptoms at the week-6 endpoint (42% reduction), which exceeded the effects of placebo (24% reduction). In analyses using a cutoff of 30% or better reduction to denote response, 76% of the subjects receiving bupropion improved, compared to 37% of the subjects receiving placebo. Similarly, in analyses using Clinical Global Impression scale scores, 52% of the subjects receiving bupropion reported being "much improved" to "very improved," compared to 11% of the subjects receiving placebo. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate a clinically and statistically significant effect of bupropion in improving ADHD in adults. The results suggest a therapeutic role for bupropion in the armamentarium of agents for ADHD in adults, while further validating the continuity of pharmacological responsivity of ADHD across the lifespan.

A controlled study of nortriptyline in children and adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.

OBJECTIVES: To study the efficacy and tolerability of nortriptyline (NT) in the treatment of pediatric attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). METHODOLOGY: Subjects were outpatient children and adolescents with ADHD ascertained from clinical referrals. Subjects were enrolled in a 6-week open study in which NT was titrated to 2 mg/kg/day as tolerated over 2 weeks. Using either a 30 % reduction in the ADHD rating scale or a score of 1 or 2 on the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scale for ADHD improvement, responders to treatment were then randomized into a 3-week, controlled discontinuation phase. During this phase, subjects either continued on their current dose of NT or were tapered to placebo under double-blind conditions. Subjects were monitored for symptoms of ADHD, oppositionality, anxiety, and depression. RESULTS: Of the 35 subjects enrolled in the study, 32 completed the open phase and 23 completed the discontinuation phase. The mean dose of NT was 80 mg (1.8 mg/kg/day), resulting in a serum level of 81 ng/ml. At the conclusion of the open 6-week study, NT was related to a significant reduction in ADHD (p < 0.001) and oppositional symptoms (p < 0.001). At the conclusion of the discontinuation phase, the 12 subjects randomized to NT had significantly lower scores on the DSM-IV ADHD symptom checklist than those 11 subjects randomized to placebo (31 versus 21; t = 2.2; p < 0.04). No significant adverse events were observed, and children were noted to have weight gain during the trial. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that NT is effective in reducing symptoms not only of ADHD but also of oppositionality. This group of children and adolescents tolerated robust dosing of NT well, with few clinical or cardiovascular adverse events.

Pemoline treatment of adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: a short-term controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Despite the increased recognition of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in adolescents, few controlled studies have assessed treatments for this age group. Adolescent issues, such as embarrassment at receiving medication at school and experimentation with abusable substances, have accelerated efforts to find effective, well-tolerated treatments beyond traditional stimulants. Pemoline has been found effective for treating both children and adults with ADHD but has not been evaluated in adolescents with ADHD. METHODS: Twenty-one adolescents (mean age 14 years old) diagnosed with ADHD by structured and clinical interviews participated in a 10-week, double-blind crossover design study of pemoline. Dosing was optimized with robust doses up to 3 mg/kg/day in one to two doses. Clinical evaluations of ADHD, depression, anxiety, and oppositional defiant disorder (ODD) symptoms were assessed weekly. RESULTS: Adolescents with ADHD exhibited a marked response to pemoline treatment relative to placebo on the ADHD rating scale (p = 0.001), with an average reduction of 3.02 points per week of treatment. Sixty percent of adolescents responded to pemoline, compared to 11% treated with placebo. This response was independent of gender or lifetime psychiatric comorbidity. Pemoline was well tolerated, with patients averaging 2.88 mg/kg/day in two doses per day, with a mean dose at end of follow-up of 181.1 mg (SD 45.6, range 112.5-262.5 mg). Side effects were mild, and no adverse hepatic events occurred. CONCLUSIONS: These findings resemble those reported in children and adults with ADHD. This trial suggests pemoline is well tolerated and effective in adolescents and may be a particularly useful ADHD treatment for adolescents.

A pilot controlled clinical trial of ABT-418, a cholinergic agonist, in the treatment of adults with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.

OBJECTIVE: Despite the increasing recognition of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in adults, there is a paucity of controlled pharmacological trials. Recent reports have suggested the potential usefulness of cholinergic agents for ADHD. To this end, the authors completed a controlled study of ABT-418, a novel cholinergic activating agent, for the treatment of adults with ADHD. METHOD: This was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, crossover trial that compared a transdermal patch of ABT-418 (75 mg/day) to placebo in adults who met DSM-IV criteria for ADHD. There were two 3-week treatment periods separated by 1 week of washout. RESULTS: Of the 32 subjects enrolled in the study (88% were men; mean age = 40 years, SD = 9), 29 completed the study. At the endpoint of each active arm (last observation carried forward), a significantly higher proportion of subjects was considered improved while receiving ABT-418 than while receiving placebo (40% versus 13%). Similarly, at endpoint there was a significantly greater reduction in ADHD symptom checklist scores (28% versus 15%). Symptoms reflective of attention, and subjects with less severe ADHD, responded more robustly to ABT-418. Treatment with ABT-418 was relatively well tolerated; dizziness and nausea were the most frequently reported adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this investigation indicate that ABT-418, a nicotinic analog, may be a potentially useful agent for the treatment of ADHD.

Absence of effect of stimulants on the phamacokinetics of desipramine in children.

We conducted a retrospective chart review to examine the pharmacokinetic interaction between desipramine and the stimulants methylphenidate and dexedrine using routinely monitored desipramine serum concentrations in children receiving desipramine either alone or with a stimulant. Subjects were 142 children and adolescents (age 6-17 yrs; 113 taking desipramine, 29 taking desipramine-stimulants) in whom 401 dose- and weight-normalized serum concentrations were evaluated (333 desipramine, 68 desipramine-stimulants). Desipramine pharmacokinetic parameters were similar for both groups, including mean weight-corrected dose (3.66+/-1.36 mg/kg, desipramine; 3.66+/-1.09 mg/kg, desipramine-stimulants; p=0.97), weight- and dose-normalized serum concentrations (47.26+/-39.26 [microg/L]/[mg/kg], desipramine, 39.02+/-19.92 [microg/L]/[mg/kg], desipramine-stimulants; p=0.09), and clearance (0.690+/-0.913 [L/kg]/hr, desipramine; 0.613+/-0.514 [L/kg]/hr, desipramine-stimulants; p=0.499). When stratified by age, gender, and type of stimulant, no difference was detected (p>0.05) between groups. Our findings indicate the absence of a clinically significant interaction between desipramine and stimulants.