Quantitative analysis of regional distribution of tau pathology with 11C-PBB3-PET in a clinical setting.

PURPOSE: The recent developments of tau-positron emission tomography (tau-PET) enable in vivo assessment of neuropathological tau aggregates. Among the tau-specific tracers, the application of 11C-pyridinyl-butadienyl-benzothiazole 3 (11C-PBB3) in PET shows high sensitivity to Alzheimer disease (AD)-related tau deposition. The current study investigates the regional tau load in patients within the AD continuum, biomarker-negative individuals (BN) and patients with suspected non-AD pathophysiology (SNAP) using 11C-PBB3-PET. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 23 memory clinic outpatients with recent decline of episodic memory were examined using 11C-PBB3-PET. Pittsburg compound B (11C-PIB) PET was available for 17, 18F-flurodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) PET for 16, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) protein levels for 11 patients. CSF biomarkers were considered abnormal based on Aß42 (< 600 ng/L) and t-tau (> 450 ng/L). The PET biomarkers were classified as positive or negative using statistical parametric mapping (SPM) analysis and visual assessment. Using the amyloid/tau/neurodegeneration (A/T/N) scheme, patients were grouped as within the AD continuum, SNAP, and BN based on amyloid and neurodegeneration status. The 11C-PBB3 load detected by PET was compared among the groups using both atlas-based and voxel-wise analyses. RESULTS: Seven patients were identified as within the AD continuum, 10 SNAP and 6 BN. In voxel-wise analysis, significantly higher 11C-PBB3 binding was observed in the AD continuum group compared to the BN patients in the cingulate gyrus, tempo-parieto-occipital junction and frontal lobe. Compared to the SNAP group, patients within the AD continuum had a considerably increased 11C-PBB3 uptake in the posterior cingulate cortex. There was no significant difference between SNAP and BN groups. The atlas-based analysis supported the outcome of the voxel-wise quantification analysis. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that 11C-PBB3-PET can effectively analyze regional tau load and has the potential to differentiate patients in the AD continuum group from the BN and SNAP group.

Comparison of MRI-based and PET-based image pre-processing for quantification of 11C-PBB3 uptake in human brain.

PURPOSE: Quantification of tau load using 11C-PBB3-PET has the potential to improve diagnosis of neurodegenerative diseases. Although MRI-based pre-processing is used as a reference method, not all patients have MRI. The feasibility of a PET-based pre-processing for the quantification of 11C-PBB3 tracer was evaluated and compared with the MRI-based method. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fourteen patients with decreased recent memory were examined with 11C-PBB3-PET and MRI. The PET scans were visually assessed and rated as either PBB3(+) or PBB3(-). The image processing based on the PET-based method was validated against the MRI-based approach. The regional uptakes were quantified using the Mesial-temporal/Temporoparietal/Rest of neocortex (MeTeR) regions. SUVR values were calculated by normalizing to the cerebellar reference region to compare both methods within the patient groups. RESULTS: Significant correlations were observed between the SUVRs of the MRI-based and the PET-based methods in the MeTeR regions (rMe=0.91; rTe=0.98; rR=0.96; p<0.0001). However, the Bland-Altman plot showed a significant bias between both methods in the subcortical Me region (bias: -0.041; 95% CI: -0.061 to -0.024; p=0.003). As in the MRI-based method, the 11C-PBB3 uptake obtained with the PET-based method was higher for the PBB3(+) group in each of the cortical regions and for the whole brain than for the PBB3(-) group (PET-basedGlobal: 1.11 vs. 0.96; Cliff's Delta (d)=0.68; p=0.04; MRI-basedGlobal: 1.11 vs. 0.97; d=0.70; p=0.03). To differentiate between positive and negative scans, Youden's index estimated the best cut-off of 0.99 from the ROC curve with good accuracy (AUC: 0.88±0.10; 95% CI: 0.67-1.00) and the same sensitivity (83%) and specificity (88%) for both methods. CONCLUSION: The PET-based pre-processing method developed to quantify the tau burden with 11C-PBB3 provided comparable SUVR values and effect sizes as the MRI-based reference method. Furthermore, both methods have a comparable discrimination accuracy between PBB3(+) and PBB3(-) groups as assessed by visual rating. Therefore, the presented PET-based method can be used for clinical diagnosis if no MRI image is available.