Treatment of Gastric Cancer Patients During COVID-19 Pandemic: The West is More Vulnerable.

The outbreak of the COVID-19 is currently the biggest international concern. Treatment of gastric cancer (GC) patients in the pandemic era with high hospital burden and under severe oncological/surgical resource constraints should implicate a need for resource re-allocation with a new "pandemic" GC treatment algorithm. The neoadjuvant/perioperative (radio-)chemotherapy is applied in the majority of advanced GC cases with poor postoperative therapy compliance. In the East, radical surgery is frequently used in the first instance, with adjuvant chemotherapy reserved for patients with a high risk of recurrence. Moreover, the elderly population might be effectively treated by surgery alone, thus saving oncological resources for younger people who need a more aggressive approach. In this framework, prioritization is a key concept based on the severity of symptoms and the need for urgent (surgical) intervention. High-risk and marginally effective surgery should be replaced with definitive radio- and/or chemotherapy. The pandemic framework to provide optimal care for GC patients must be based on multidisciplinary decision-making and include all anti-cancer treatment options: surgery, systemic therapy, and radiotherapy. The priority and staffing dictate adherence to the new algorithm. We believe that these priorities may improve the delivery of care to all, including elderly GC patients.

Yield of staging laparoscopy in gastric cancer is influenced by Laurén histologic subtype.

BACKGROUND: Staging laparoscopy (SL) with cytologic lavage is a useful staging procedure that allows tailoring the treatment of advanced gastric cancer (GC). The current study aimed to evaluate the total yield of SL in patients with various Laurén histo-types of GC, before planned neoadjuvant chemotherapy and gastrectomy. METHODS: After exclusion of distant metastatic disease on imaging modalities, 173 patients with primary advanced gastric adenocarcinoma who underwent SL between August 2016 and September 2018, were eligible for the analysis. Patients sex, age, Lauren histo-type, tumor location, grade, cT, and cN were assessed in bivariate analysis. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent factors associated with peritoneal metastases. RESULTS: Peritoneal metastases, ascites, and positive cytology were found in 39 (22.5%), 17 (9.8%) and 38 (22%) patients, respectively. The total yield of the SL in the current study was 36.4%. Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that serosal involvement (cT4) and diffuse histo-type were independent predictors of peritoneal metastases (OR, 15; 95% CI, 1.9-119, P = .02 and OR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.2-4.6, P = .01, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Although cT4 and diffuse tumors show the highest association with peritoneal metastases, SL is a valuable diagnostic procedure in all advanced GC patients.

Blast from the past: Perioperative use of the Maruyama computer program for prediction of lymph node involvement in the surgical treatment of gastric cancer following neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Surgical quality assurance is a key element of gastric cancer treatment. The Maruyama Computer Program (MCP) allows to predict lymph node involvement in stations no. 1-16. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the accuracy of the MCP predictions in GC patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCTH) followed by gastrectomy with adequate lymphadenectomy. METHODS: 101 patients who underwent preoperative nCTH followed by D2 gastrectomy with curative intent were analysed. The response to nCTH was measured using the tumour regression grade system. RESULTS: Test sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy of the MCP were 92%, 33%, 41%, 89%, and 53%, respectively. In patients with response to nCTH, number of false positive (FP) results was significantly higher than in patients who did not respond to nCTH both in the N1 (56.3% vs 28.9%, p < 0.0001) and in the N2 (59% vs 41%, p < 0.0001) trier. The risk for FP results was 6 times higher in N1 (OR = 6.50, 95%CI: 3.91-10.82,; p < 0.0001) and N2 (OR = 5.84, 95%CI: 2.85-11.96; p < 0.0001) triers. In patients with intestinal type GC, the risk for FP results was 4 times higher than in other histologic types of GC in both N1 (OR = 4.23, 95%CI: 2.58-6.95; p < 0.0001) and N2 (OR = 4.23, 95%CI: 2.02-9.62; p = 0.0002) triers. CONCLUSIONS: MCP predictions in the GC patients treated with nCTH have low specificity due to significantly high number of FP results. Noticeably low accuracy level of predictions indicate a need for new prediction models, based on Laurén classification, since it may provide some information on expected regression grade.

Distinct molecular subtypes of gastric cancer: from Laurén to molecular pathology.

In Western countries the majority of gastric cancers (GC) are usually diagnosed in advanced stages reporting a 5-year survival rate of only 26%. The Laurén classification of GC was most widely used in clinical practice since it reflects GC morphology, epidemiology, tumor biology, clinical management and outcome. Despite the initial promise of individualizing antitumor treatment, the management of GC still remains relatively broad and general. Apart from clinical staging, molecular profiling enables targeting of the identified underlying alterations, rather than histology. In contrast to breast carcinoma, molecular classification of GC does not yet imply treatment modality. Molecular classifications of GC and their therapeutic implications are therefore extensively studied. The current proposed molecular divisions of GC come from three different parts of the world where different standard treatment modalities for advanced GC are recommended. Wider use of GC molecular subtyping may solve problems, such as susceptibility to novel systemic therapy regimens or selection of patients for aggressive surgery and targeted adjuvant/conversion therapy. In any case, the rapid entry of novel molecular targeted therapies into routine oncology practice clearly underscores the urgent need for clinicians to be aware of these new possibilities.

99mTc-EDDA/HYNIC-TOC somatostatin receptor scintigraphy in daily clinical practice.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to assess the impact of 99mTc-EDDA/HYNIC-TOC (99mTc-TOC) somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (SRS) in clinical practice. MATERIAL/METHODS: One hundred seventeen patients were divided into 6 groups: 1, initial detection and localization of suspected neuroendocrine tumor (NET); 2, tumor staging before therapy; 3, staging of NET of unknown origin, 4, restaging after surgery of primary tumor; 5, diagnosis of solitary pulmonary nodules (SPNs), and 6, follow-up after "cold" somatostatin analogues treatment. RESULTS: In group 1, clinical suspicions were not confirmed in any of the patients; in group 2, most of the primary lesions showed overexpression of somatostatin receptors (SSRT); in group 3, the primary tumor was not identified in any of the patients; in group 4, recurrences were depicted in 7 out of 47 patients; in group 5, only 1 malignant SPN was detected, and in group 6, regression of primary mass and metastases were seen on follow-up SRS in 1 patient. CONCLUSIONS: 99mTc-TOC SRS is useful in staging of SSRT-overexpressing tumors of known and unknown primary origin, as well as in restaging after primary tumor surgery. This method is less effective in detecting suspected NET and assessing SPNs. Further investigation is necessary to evaluate the usefulness of SRS in monitoring patients after biological treatment.