Triage nurse prediction of hospital admission.

INTRODUCTION: Numerous factors affect patient flow in the emergency department. One important factor that has a negative impact on flow is ED patients waiting for an inpatient bed. It currently takes approximately 5 hours from triage to a request for an inpatient bed in our emergency department. Knowledge of patients requiring admission early in their ED evaluation could speed up the process of securing a bed. The objective of this study was to determine if an ED triage nurse (TRN) can determine at triage if a patient will be admitted to an inpatient unit. A secondary objective was to measure the confidence of the TRN prediction. METHODS: A prospective, non-consecutive study was conducted during an 18-day period in 2010 in a community hospital emergency department treating 76,000 patients. Experienced TRNs were trained in the evaluation tool. Immediately after the initial TRN evaluation, a determination was made in writing by the TRN regarding the likelihood of hospital admission and level of confidence in this decision. Patients who did not enter the emergency department through triage (ambulance) or were younger than 18 years were excluded. RESULTS: A total of 3514 patients approached triage. Of these patients, 1866 were eligible for the study and 1164 (62%) were enrolled. We excluded 25 subjects because of missing data, resulting in 1139 subjects. Missed subjects had the same baseline characteristics. A total of 287 (25.2%) hospital admissions occurred. TRN predicted 217 admissions, with a sensitivity of 75.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 71.3-79.5) and a specificity of 84.5% (95% CI 83.1-85.8). The TRN reported being extremely confident in the prediction 50.1% of the time. In these cases, the TRN demonstrated an admission sensitivity of 81.6% (95% CI 76.5-85.8) and specificity of 93.1% (95% CI 91.8-94.3). CONCLUSIONS: The TRN demonstrated a high sensitivity and specificity in admission prediction at triage and could potentially save many hours in requesting an inpatient bed. This increased efficiency could result in a more rapid ED throughput and decreased ED boarding.

Phantom shocks in patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator.

Phantom shock is the sensation of shock in the absence of an actual implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) discharge. The ICD is now the first-line therapy for patients with ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation. There has been a significant increase in the number of patients with an ICD and patients presenting to the Emergency Department (ED) after a shock for evaluation and device interrogation. Phantom shock is more likely to be nocturnal in the first 6 months after implantation, and patients are more likely to be clinically depressed and have higher levels of anxiety. There is no specific treatment. We report 3 patients who presented to the ED with the sensation of ICD discharges, however, on device interrogation had no shocks and no dysrhythmias.

Patients who leave the emergency department without being seen.

INTRODUCTION: Patients who present to the ED for care and leave without being seen (LWBS) represent a significant problem. The objective of this study was to determine why patients LWBS, how long they perceived waiting versus actual time waited before leaving, and factors that might have prevented LWBS. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, scripted phone survey of all patients who left without being seen over a two-month period in 2006 at an ED with approximately 65,000 yearly visits. Outcome measures were number leaving, ability to obtain care after leaving, reason for leaving, would they return to this ED, perceived and actual time waited, number with a primary physician, and factors associated with leaving. RESULTS: One-hundred and twenty-seven of 11,147 total patients (1.1%) patients left without being seen. Seventy-two (56.7%) were interviewed within 8 days. Eighty-four and seven-tenths percent stated they had a primary physician. The mean age was 29.9 years, and 44.4% were male. The patient-reported mean time waited before leaving was 73.2 minutes while the actual mean time waited was 70.4 minutes. The reasons for leaving were the length of wait (76.7%), the problem resolved (12.3%), and for other reasons (11.0%). During the week after leaving the ED, 56.3% were able to obtain medical care. Sixty-five percent would seek future emergency care at this ED, 15.3% would not, and 19.7% would possibly return. During the wait, patients wanted information, lab tests/X-rays, and analgesics. DISCUSSION: Most would return for future ED care. Most had a physician and were able to obtain care elsewhere. Reduced LWBS might be accomplished by triage testing, communication and attention to pain.

Application of San Francisco Syncope Rule in elderly ED patients.

OBJECTIVES: The San Francisco Syncope Rule (SFSR) is a decision rule with the potential to identify patients at risk for serious outcomes within 7 days of the emergency department (ED) visit for syncope. The initial studies of the SFSR reported a high sensitivity and specificity for identifying patients, of all ages, with serious outcomes. Our objective was to determine if the SFSR can be safely and accurately applied to ED patients aged 65 and older with syncope or near-syncope. METHODS: A retrospective review of ED patients aged 65 years and older with syncope or near-syncope between January 2000 and August 2001 was performed. Charts were reviewed for evidence of SFSR risks for the ED visit and serious outcomes within 7 days of the ED visit. RESULTS: Of 773 subjects identified as having syncope or near-syncope, 517 subjects were included. There were 98 patients with serious outcomes. Twenty-three patients who were negative on SFSR had serious outcomes. The sensitivity and specificity of the SFSR were 76.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 66.7%-84.3%) and 36.8% (95% CI, 32.2%-41.6%), respectively. The negative and positive predictive values were 87.0% (95% CI, 80.9%-91.4%) and 22.1% (95% CI, 17.8%-26.9%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In our cohort of elderly ED patients, the SFSR had a lower sensitivity and specificity. The SFSR may not be applicable to the elderly ED population. Future prospective validation is necessary before application to the ED elderly population.

Nursing blood specimen collection techniques and hemolysis rates in an emergency department: analysis of venipuncture versus intravenous catheter collection techniques.

INTRODUCTION: Re-collection of hemolyzed blood specimens delays patient care in overcrowded emergency departments. Our emergency department was unable to meet a benchmark of a 2% hemolysis rate for the collection of blood samples. Our hypothesis was that hemolysis rates of blood specimens differ dependent on the blood collection technique by venipuncture or intravenous catheter draw. METHODS: A prospective, cross-over study of blood collection techniques in a 64,000 annual visit, community teaching hospital emergency department was conducted. Eleven experienced registered nurses with more than 2 years' ED experience completed a standardized phlebotomy retraining session. Registered nurses were randomly assigned to collect samples via intravenous catheters or venipuncture. After nurses collected 70 samples, they then collected samples via the other method. A standardized data collection form was completed. Blood samples were processed and assessed for hemolysis using standard procedures by laboratory technicians who were blinded to the collection method. RESULTS: A total of 853 valid samples were collected; 355 samples (41.6%) were drawn via venipuncture and 498 samples (58.4%) were drawn through an intravenous catheter. Of these, 28 intravenous catheter samples (5.6%) were found to be hemolyzed, whereas only 1 venipuncture sample (0.3%) was hemolyzed. This finding was significant (x2 < 0.001). DISCUSSION: Experienced ED nurses can reduce the number of hemolyzed specimens by collecting via venipuncture instead of through intravenous catheters. This practice should be considered as standard of care in the ED setting. LIMITATIONS: Total samples by nurse were affected by EMS patients arriving with existing intravenous lines, and nurse schedules affected total samples per nurse.

Beta-blocker use in elderly ED patients with acute myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: Despite the effectiveness of early beta-blocker (BB) use in reducing mortality in acute myocardial infarction (AMI), they remain underutilized in the emergency department (ED) management of AMI. The elderly, with higher AMI mortality, and women, may be particularly vulnerable to underutilization of BB. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of age and gender on BB use in AMI in the ED. METHODS: A retrospective study of all ST-elevation AMI (STEMI) ED patients presenting to a community hospital ED from 2001 to 2003. Any contraindication to BB use (hypotension, bradycardia, AV block, active bronchospasm, and active congestive heart failure) was determined. Chi-square analysis was used to determine differences by gender and age. RESULTS: Three hundred eighty-five patients with STEMI were identified. Thirty-eight percent were women and 71% were over 60 years of age. Of the 270 (70%) who did not receive BB, 141 (52%) had contraindications to BB use. The total BB eligible group was 244 (63%). Of patients without contraindications to BB, 53% did not receive BB in the ED. By gender, 83 (54%) males and 46 (51%) females did not receive BB (P=.669). By age, 96 subjects (59%) over age 60 and 33 subjects (41%) under age 60 did not receive BB (P=.011). CONCLUSION: Despite convincing evidence of effectiveness, BB remain underutilized in ED management of AMI, especially in the elderly. There does not appear to be a gender difference in BB use. Education programs should be directed towards emergency physicians regarding BB use in AMI, especially in elderly ED patients.

ECG manifestations of selected extracardiac diseases.

This article reviews the ECG manifestations of selected extracardiac diseases, including pulmonary embolism, pneumothorax, pulmonary hypertension, aortic dissection, central nervous system dis-ease, gastrointestinal disease, and sarcoidosis.

Electrocardiographic manifestations: long QT Syndrome.

Long QT Syndrome is a cardiac disorder caused by an abnormal prolongation of the ventricular repolarization phase. The primary concern in this syndrome is the propensity towards polymorphic ventricular tachycardia and sudden cardiac death. This article presents several cases, highlighting the pathophysiology, clinical presentation, and management of this disorder.

Electrocardiographic manifestations: acute inferior wall myocardial infarction.

The 12-lead electrocardiogram (EKG) is an important tool in evaluating the patient with acute myocardial infarction (MI). Patients with acute inferior wall myocardial infarction (IWMI) represent a heterogeneous group in terms of morbidity, mortality, Emergency Department (ED) management, and site of occlusion in the culprit coronary artery. The standard 12-lead EKG, right-sided chest leads and posterior chest leads, in conjunction with clinical findings often provide the necessary information for the Emergency Physician (EP) to predict complications, morbidity and mortality. IWMI patients may have associated right ventricular infarction (RVI) or lateral and posterior wall extension. Each of these entities is associated with specific hemodynamic abnormalities and increased mortality. In addition, various atrioventricular (AV) blocks are commonly associated with IWMI. This article presents several cases of IWMI with EKGs and a discussion of EKG interpretation in the setting of IWMI.

Electrocardiographic manifestations: diagnosis of atrioventricular block in the Emergency Department.

Patients with bradycardia are commonly encountered by the Emergency Physician. Of the possible bradydysrhythmias, atrioventricular blocks (AVB) represent a significant portion of these presentations. In this article, we provide four illustrative cases of patients presenting to the Emergency Department (ED) with AVB. We review the various types of AV block dysrhythmias (1st, 2nd, and 3rd degrees) and their underlying etiologies. This discussion also focuses on the presentation, clinical considerations, management and acute treatment of AVB dysrhythmias in the emergent setting.

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest locations in a rural community: where should we place AEDs?

Early defibrillation improves survival for patients suffering cardiac arrest from ventricular fibrillation (VF) or ventricular tachycardia (VT). Automated external defibrillators (AEDs) should be placed in locations in which there is a high incidence of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OOHCA). The study objective was to identify high-risk, rural locations that might benefit from AED placement. A retrospective review of OOHCA in a rural community during the past 5.5 years was conducted. The OOHCAs that occurred in non-residential areas were categorized based on location. Nine hundred, forty OOHCAs occurred during the study period of which 265 (28.2%) happened in non-residential areas. Of these, 127 (47.9%) occurred in healthcare-related locations, including 104 (39.2%) in extended care facilities. No location used in this study had more than two OOHCAs. Most (52.1%) non-residential OOHCAs occurred as isolated events in 146 different locations. Almost half of the OOHCAs that occurred in non-residential areas took place in healthcare-related facilities suggesting that patients at these locations may benefit from AED placement. First responders with AEDs are likely to have the greatest impact in a rural community.

Electrocardiographic manifestations: ventricular tachycardia.

Ventricular tachycardia is a serious rhythm disturbance that originates from any part of the myocardium or conduction system below the atrioventricular node. Ventricular tachycardia (VT) presents with a wide QRS complex and a rate greater than 120 beats/min. Ventricular tachycardia is frequently encountered as a complication of coronary artery disease or cardiomyopathy; furthermore, VT is also seen in patients with medication adverse effect or electrolyte disturbance. Ventricular tachycardia presents electrocardiographically in several forms, including monomorphic and polymorphic VT. As is true in most Emergency Department presentations, the Emergency Physician must approach the dysrhythmic patient from an undifferentiated perspective, in this instance, the wide complex tachycardia (WCT) scenario. The electrocardiographic differential diagnosis of WCT classically includes VT and supraventricular tachycardia with aberrant intra-ventricular conduction. This article will review the electrocardiographic presentations encountered in patients with ventricular tachycardia.

Electrocardiographic manifestations: bundle branch blocks and fascicular blocks.

Intraventricular conduction block is the general name given to a varied group of electrocardiographic entities. All share a common finding of some degree of delay in ventricular activation; recognition of these blocks hinges upon analysis of the QRS complex, as well as the ST-T changes associated with them. Bundle branch block (right or left), and fascicular block (left anterior or left posterior) are all examples of intraventricular conduction block. Causation of intraventricular conduction block may be cardiac or noncardiac; early recognition of the etiology may be of clinical importance. This article reviews the basic anatomy and physiology related to intraventricular conduction blocks, and then examines each in terms of electrocardiographic definition and clinical correlation.

Electrocardiographic manifestations: wide complex tachycardia due to accessory pathway.

Tachycardia with a wide QRS complex is usually due to ventricular tachycardia (VT), supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) with aberrant intraventricular conduction, or an accessory pathway-mediated dysrhythmia. The most common type of accessory pathway causing a wide complex tachycardia is the atrioventricular bypass tract. Distinguishing the accessory pathway-mediated tachycardia from VT or SVT with aberrancy is often difficult, but has important clinical consequences. This article will review the diagnosis of wide complex tachycardia due to an accessory pathway and its related management in the emergent setting.

Evaluation of emergency medicine resident death notification skills by direct observation.

UNLABELLED: Emergency physicians commonly perform death notifications. Physician training in death notification has been limited. Resident physicians are rarely evaluated in their performance of death notifications. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate death notification skills by direct observation of actual notifications performed by trained emergency medicine (EM) residents. METHODS: This was a prospective, observational study of EM resident death notification performance. EM residents received training and then were directly observed and evaluated by trained evaluators during actual death notifications in a 64,000-visit community teaching hospital emergency department. RESULTS: There were 327 evaluations of 70 different EM residents. Overall performance evaluations were 55% excellent, 40% satisfactory, and 5% unsatisfactory. Third-year EM residents and female EM residents were more likely to be rated excellent. CONCLUSIONS: Death notification is a skill that can be evaluated like other EM skills. Trained EM residents performed well in actual death notifications when directly observed and evaluated. Senior residents and female residents were more likely to be rated excellent.

Electrocardiographic manifestations: narrow QRS complex tachycardias.

Narrow QRS complex tachycardia is a common dysrhythmia in Emergency Medicine practice. Diagnosis and mechanism often can be made by 12-lead electrocardiographic (EKG) analysis but may subsequently require electrophysiologic testing. The clinical manifestations are varied and dependent upon heart rate, prior cardiac disease, and general physiologic status. Patient management is directed towards the etiology and mechanism of the dysrhythmia and includes vagal maneuvers, pharmacologic therapy, and cardioversion. Hemodynamically compromised patients must be promptly treated. Patients are often admitted to the hospital but selected patients can be safely discharged from the Emergency Department for outpatient evaluation and management. Pediatric and pregnant patients are, in general, treated the same as adults. Several case examples and EKGs are presented.