Reducing interruptions during duty radiology shifts, assessment of its benefits and review of factors affecting the radiology working environment.

AIM: To investigate and reduce the number of inappropriate interruptions to the duty radiology registrar, as well as subjectively assess the effect of reducing interruptions and identify other methods of improving the duty working environment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A pre- and post-intervention prospective quantitative study and post-intervention retrospective qualitative study of duty radiology registrars was performed at a tertiary referral centre. The first cycle of the quantitative study was performed prior to implementation of a telephone triage system. The second cycle and qualitative study were performed afterwards. RESULTS: The average number of interruptions per day dropped by 43.7% after the intervention. Moreover, inappropriate interruptions dropped from one in three to one in five interruptions. Improvement was demonstrated following the intervention for perceived patient safety, workload, reporting efficiency, reporting accuracy, work satisfaction, and stress. The most common hindrance to a good working environment was interruptions (36%). The most common suggestion for improvement was improved comfort (33%). CONCLUSION: The present study demonstrates that a telephone triage system can substantially reduce the number of interruptions to the duty radiologist. It also demonstrates that reducing interruptions in radiology has the potential to improve the working environment in many ways.

Acceptability of oral iodinated contrast media: a head-to-head comparison of four media.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the palatability of iodinated oral contrast media commonly used in abdominopelvic CT and CT colonography (CTC). METHODS: 80 volunteers assessed the palatability of a 20-ml sample of a standard 30 mg ml(-1) dilution of Omnipaque® (iohexol; GE Healthcare, Cork, Ireland), Telebrix® (meglumine ioxithalamate; Guerbet, Aulnay-sous-Bois, France), Gastromiro® (iopamidol; Bracco, High Wycombe, UK) and Gastrografin® (sodium diatrizoate and meglumine diatrizoate; Bayer, Newbury, UK) in a computer-generated random order. RESULTS: Gastrografin is rated significantly less palatable than the remaining media (p<0.005). Omnipaque and Telebrix are significantly more palatable than Gastromiro. No difference existed between Omnipaque and Telebrix. 39% of participants would refuse to consume the quantities of Gastrografin required for a CTC examination compared with Telebrix (7%) and Omnipaque (9%) (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Omnipaque and Telebrix are significantly more palatable than both Gastromiro and Gastrografin, with participants more willing to ingest them in larger quantities as well as being less expensive. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Omnipaque and Telebrix are significantly more palatable iodinated oral contrast media than both Gastromiro and Gastrografin, which has potential implications in compliance with both abdominopelvic CT and CTC.

Evaluation of two minimal-preparation regimes for CT colonography: optimising image quality and patient acceptability.

OBJECTIVE: To compare a 2 day bowel preparation regime of barium, iodine and a mild stimulant laxative with a 1 day iodine-only regime for CT colonography (CTC). METHODS: 100 consecutive patients underwent CTC. The first 50 patients (Regime 1) ingested 1 bisacodyl tablet twice a day 3 days before CTC and 1 dose each of 50 ml of barium and 20 ml of iodinated contrast per day starting 2 days before CTC. The second 50 patients (Regime 2) ingested 3 doses of iodinated contrast over 24 h prior to CTC. Volumes of residual stool and fluid, and the effectiveness of stool and fluid tagging, were graded according to methods established by Taylor et al (Taylor S, Slaker A, Burling D, Tam E, Greenhalgh R, Gartner L, et al. CT colonography: optimisation, diagnostic performance and patient acceptability of reduced-laxative regimens using barium-based faecal tagging. Eur Radiol 2008; 18: 32-42). A 3 day low-residue diet was taken by both cohorts. Questionnaires rating the side-effects and burden of the bowel preparation were compared to a control cohort of patients undergoing barium enema. RESULTS: The proportion of colons producing none/scattered stool (score 1) was 90.3% with Regime 1 and 65.0% with Regime 2 (p<0.005). Any residual stool was significantly better tagged with Regime 1 (score 5), with 91.7% of Regime 1 exhibiting optimum tagging vs 71.3% of Regime 2 (p<0.05). No significant differences in side-effects between the bowel preparation regimes for CTC were elicited. Bowel preparation for barium enema was tolerated significantly worse than both of the CTC bowel preparation regimes. CONCLUSION: Regime 1, containing a 3 day preparation of a mild laxative, barium and iodine, produced a significantly better prepared colon, with no difference in patient acceptability.