Parameterization of Physiologically Based Biopharmaceutics Models: Workshop Summary Report.

This Article shares the proceedings from the August 29th, 2023 (day 1) workshop "Physiologically Based Biopharmaceutics Modeling (PBBM) Best Practices for Drug Product Quality: Regulatory and Industry Perspectives". The focus of the day was on model parametrization; regulatory authorities from Canada, the USA, Sweden, Belgium, and Norway presented their views on PBBM case studies submitted by industry members of the IQ consortium. The presentations shared key questions raised by regulators during the mock exercise, regarding the PBBM input parameters and their justification. These presentations also shed light on the regulatory assessment processes, content, and format requirements for future PBBM regulatory submissions. In addition, the day 1 breakout presentations and discussions gave the opportunity to share best practices around key questions faced by scientists when parametrizing PBBMs. Key questions included measurement and integration of drug substance solubility for crystalline vs amorphous drugs; impact of excipients on apparent drug solubility/supersaturation; modeling of acid-base reactions at the surface of the dissolving drug; choice of dissolution methods according to the formulation and drug properties with a view to predict the in vivo performance; mechanistic modeling of in vitro product dissolution data to predict in vivo dissolution for various patient populations/species; best practices for characterization of drug precipitation from simple or complex formulations and integration of the data in PBBM; incorporation of drug permeability into PBBM for various routes of uptake and prediction of permeability along the GI tract.

Biowaiver Monograph for Immediate-Release Solid Oral Dosage Forms: Fexofenadine.

In this monograph, the potential use of methods based on the Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS) framework to evaluate the bioequivalence of solid immediate-release (IR) oral dosage forms containing fexofenadine hydrochloride as a substitute for a pharmacokinetic study in human volunteers is investigated. We assessed the solubility, permeability, dissolution, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, therapeutic index, bioavailability, drug-excipient interaction, and other properties using BCS recommendations from the ICH, FDA and EMA. The findings unequivocally support fexofenadine's classification to BCS Class IV as it is neither highly soluble nor highly permeable. Further impeding the approval of generic equivalents through the BCS-biowaiver pathway is the reference product's inability to release ≥ 85 % of the drug substance within 30 min in pH 1.2 and pH 4.5 media. According to ICH rules, BCS class IV drugs do not qualify for waiving clinical bioequivalence studies based on the BCS, even though fexofenadine has behaved more like a BCS class I/III than a class IV molecule in pharmacokinetic studies to date and has a wide therapeutic index.

Enteric-Coated Capsules Providing Reliable Site-Specific Drug Delivery to the Distal Ileum.

Nefecon, a targeted-release capsule formulation of budesonide approved for the reduction of proteinuria in adults with primary immunoglobulin A nephropathy, targets overproduction of galactose-deficient immunoglobulin A type 1 in the Peyer's patches at the gut mucosal level. To investigate whether the commercial formulation of Nefecon capsules reliably releases budesonide to the distal ileum, a human study was conducted with test capsules reproducing the delayed-release function of Nefecon capsules. Caffeine was included in the test capsules as a marker for capsule opening in the gut since it appears rapidly in saliva after release from orally administered dosage forms. Magnetic resonance imaging with black iron oxide was used to determine the capsule's position in the gut at the time caffeine was first measured in saliva and additionally to directly visualize dispersion of the capsule contents in the gut. In vitro dissolution results confirmed that the test capsules had the same delayed-release characteristics as Nefecon capsules. In 10 of 12 human volunteers, the capsule was demonstrated to open in the distal ileum; in the other two subjects, it opened just past the ileocecal junction. These results compared favorably with the high degree of variability seen in other published imaging studies of delayed-release formulations targeting the gut. The test capsules were shown to reliably deliver their contents to the distal ileum, the region with the highest concentration of Peyer's patches.

Relative Performance of Volume of Distribution Prediction Methods for Lipophilic Drugs with Uncertainty in LogP Value.

PURPOSE: The goal was to assess, for lipophilic drugs, the impact of logP on human volume of distribution at steady-state (VDss) predictions, including intermediate fut and Kp values, from six methods: Oie-Tozer, Rodgers-Rowland (tissue-specific Kp and only muscle Kp), GastroPlus, Korzekwa-Nagar, and TCM-New. METHOD: A sensitivity analysis with focus on logP was conducted by keeping pKa and fup constant for each of four drugs, while varying logP. VDss was also calculated for the specific literature logP values. Error prediction analysis was conducted by analyzing prediction errors by source of logP values, drug, and overall values. RESULTS: The Rodgers-Rowland methods were highly sensitive to logP values, followed by GastroPlus and Korzekwa-Nagar. The Oie-Tozer and TCM-New methods were only modestly sensitive to logP. Hence, the relative performance of these methods depended upon the source of logP value. As logP values increased, TCM-New and Oie-Tozer were the most accurate methods. TCM-New was the only method that was accurate regardless of logP value source. Oie-Tozer provided accurate predictions for griseofulvin, posaconazole, and isavuconazole; GastroPlus for itraconazole and isavuconazole; Korzekwa-Nagar for posaconazole; and TCM-New for griseofulvin, posaconazole, and isavuconazole. Both Rodgers-Rowland methods provided inaccurate predictions due to the overprediction of VDss. CONCLUSIONS: TCM-New was the most accurate prediction of human VDss across four drugs and three logP sources, followed by Oie-Tozer. TCM-New showed to be the best method for VDss prediction of highly lipophilic drugs, suggesting BPR as a favorable surrogate for drug partitioning in the tissues, and which avoids the use of fup.

In Vitro Lipolysis Model to Predict Food Effect of Poorly Water-Soluble Drugs Itraconazole, Rivaroxaban, and Ritonavir.

It is desirable to predict positive food effect of oral formulations due to food mediated dissolution enhancement of lipophilic drugs. The objective was to assess the ability of in vitro lipolysis to anticipate a positive food effect. Tested formulations included rivaroxaban and itraconazole, where some formulations, but not all, exhibit a positive food effect in vivo in humans. Amorphous solid dispersion formulations of ritonavir, which exhibit a negative food effect in vivo in humans, were also studied. Fe-lipolysis and Fa-lipolysis media representing fed and fasted intestinal conditions were used. Results show frequent agreement between in vitro lipolysis predictions and in vivo human outcomes. For rivaroxaban, food effect of unformulated active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) and products were correctly predicted where 2.5 mg and 10 mg strengths did not show any food effect; however, 20 mg did show a positive food effect. For itraconazole, all four products were correctly predicted, with Sporanox, Sempera, and generic capsules having a food effect, but Tolsura not having a positive food effect. For ritonavir, lipolysis predicted a positive food effect for API and Norvir tablet and powder, but Norvir products have negative food effect in vivo in humans. Overall, the lipolysis model showed favorable predictability and merits additional evaluation.

Physiologically Based Biopharmaceutics Modeling (PBBM): Best Practices for Drug Product Quality, Regulatory and Industry Perspectives: 2023 Workshop Summary Report.

Physiologically based biopharmaceutics modeling (PBBM) is used to elevate drug product quality by providing a more accurate and holistic understanding of how drugs interact with the human body. These models are based on the integration of physiological, pharmacological, and pharmaceutical data to simulate and predict drug behavior in vivo. Effective utilization of PBBM requires a consistent approach to model development, verification, validation, and application. Currently, only one country has a draft guidance document for PBBM, whereas other major regulatory authorities have had limited experience with the review of PBBM. To address this gap, industry submitted confidential PBBM case studies to be reviewed by the regulatory agencies; software companies committed to training. PBBM cases were independently and collaboratively discussed by regulators, and academic colleagues participated in some of the discussions. Successful bioequivalence "safe space" industry case examples are also presented. Overall, six regulatory agencies were involved in the case study exercises, including ANVISA, FDA, Health Canada, MHRA, PMDA, and EMA (experts from Belgium, Germany, Norway, Portugal, Spain, and Sweden), and we believe this is the first time such a collaboration has taken place. The outcomes were presented at this workshop, together with a participant survey on the utility and experience with PBBM submissions, to discuss the best scientific practices for developing, validating, and applying PBBMs. The PBBM case studies enabled industry to receive constructive feedback from global regulators and highlighted clear direction for future PBBM submissions for regulatory consideration.

Application of bootstrap f2 to dissolution data from biorelevant media and evidence of the conservative nature of bootstrap f2.

f2 with or without bootstrapping is the most common method to compare in vitro dissolution profiles, but methods to compare dissolution profiles have become less harmonized. The objective was to compare outcomes from bootstrap f2 and f2 (i.e. not-bootstrapped f2) using a large set of in vitro dissolution data. Non-parametric bootstrapping was performed on the 104 profile comparisons that did not meet the percent coefficient of variation (CV%) criteria to use average dissolution data. Bootstrap f2 was taken as the lower 90 % confidence interval of bootstrapped samples. There was concordance between bootstrap f2 and f2 in 92 of the 104 comparisons (88 %). There were no false positives. However, 12 % were false negative. Inspection of these discordance pairs suggests that bootstrap f2 serves as a conservative approach to assess profile similarity, particularly when a value of 50 is being used as decision criteria.

Efficiency of single pharmaceutical surfactants to mimic intestinal biorelevant media solubilization and dissolution of etravirine: Comparison of intrinsic and film dissolution models.

We understand that quality control dissolution media may best anticipate in vivo product performance by mimicking in vivo media, but preferably involve at most a single pharmaceutical surfactant for routine laboratory use. The objective here was to estimate the concentrations of six pharmaceutical surfactants to mimic etravirine solubility and intrinsic dissolution rate, as well as dissolution rate from a film model, in each Fed State Simulated Intestinal Fluid Version 2 (FeSSIF-V2) and Fasted State Simulated Intestinal Fluid Version 2 (FaSSIF-V2). Solubility studies and colloid sizing measurements were conducted. Results indicate that all six surfactants were more efficient than FeSSIF-V2 or FaSSIF-V2 at solubilizing drug, and also exhibited higher micelle diffusivities than FeSSIF-V2 and FaSSIF-V2 mixed-micelles. The rank-order potency (on mM basis) of the six pharmaceutical surfactants to mimic etravirine solubility in each FeSSIF-V2 and FaSSIF-V2 was: polysorbate 80 (PS80) > polysorbate 20 (PS20) > polyoxyethylene(23) lauryl ether (POE23) > POE10 > hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide (HEX) > sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS). This rank-order potency was almost the same to mimic drug dissolution rate into each FeSSIF-V2 and FaSSIF-V2, except POE10 > POE23. For the most potent surfactant, PS80, 0.461 mM and 0.140 mM PS80 was estimated to mimic etravirine's solubility and dissolution rate into FeSSIF-V2, respectively, using the intrinsic dissolution model. The low PS80 concentration to mimic dissolution rate reflects the relatively high diffusivity of PS80 micelles, compared to FeSSIF-V2 mixed-micelle diffusivity, which was the case for all six pharmaceutical surfactants. Results are also presented in terms of a film dissolution model for surfactant-mediated dissolution, where dissolution enhancement was less than that in the intrinsic dissolution model, and the film model required lower surfactant concentration than in intrinsic dissolution model to mimic FeSSIF-V2-enhanced dissolution. Findings have promised to identify single pharmaceutical surfactant concentrations that mimic key performance attributes of biorelevant media.

Lack of Effect of Antioxidants on Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS) Class III Drug Permeability.

The addition of antioxidants to pharmaceutical products is a potential approach to inhibit nitrosamine formation, particularly in solid oral dosage forms like tablets and capsules. The objective was to assess the effect of ten antioxidants on the permeability of four Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS) Class III drugs. Bi-directional drug permeability studies in the absence and presence of antioxidants were performed in vitro across MDCK-II monolayers. No antioxidant increased drug permeability, while the positive control sodium lauryl sulfate always increased drug permeability. Results support that any of the ten antioxidants, up to at least 10 mg, can be added to a solid oral dosage form without modulating passive drug intestinal permeability. Additional considerations are also discussed.

Concordance of vacuum compression molding with spray drying in screening of amorphous solid dispersions of itraconazole.

Spray drying is a well-established method for screening spray dried dispersions (SDDs) but is material consuming, and the amorphous solid dispersions (ASDs) formed have low bulk density. Vacuum Compression Molding (VCM) is a potential method to avoid these limitations. This study focuses on VCM to screen ASDs containing itraconazole and L, M, or H polymer grades of hydroxypropyl methylcellulose acetate succinate (HPMCAS) and compares their morphology, amorphous stability, and dissolution performance with spray drying. Results indicate that VCM ASDs were comparable to SDDs. Both VCM ASDs and spray drying SDDs with HPMCAS-L and HPMCAS-M had improved dissolution profiles, while HPMCAS-H did not. Dynamic light scattering findings agreed with dissolution profiles, indicating that L and M grades produced monodisperse, smaller colloids, whereas H grade formed larger, polydisperse colloids. Capsules containing ASDs from VCM disintegrated and dissolved in the media; however, SDD capsules formed agglomerates and failed to disintegrate completely. Findings indicate that the VCM ASDs are comparable to SDDs in terms of dissolution performance and amorphous stability. VCM may be utilized in early ASD formulation development to select drug-polymer pairs for subsequent development.

Biowaiver Monograph for Immediate-Release Solid Oral Dosage Forms: Isavuconazonium Sulfate.

A Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS)-based biowaiver monograph is presented for isavuconazonium sulfate. A BCS-based biowaiver is a regulatory option to substitute appropriate in vitro data for in vivo bioequivalence studies. Isavuconazonium sulfate is the prodrug of isavuconazole, a broad-spectrum azole antifungal indicated for invasive fungal infections. While the prodrug can be classified as a BCS Class III drug with high solubility but low permeability, the parent drug can be classified as a BCS Class II drug with low solubility but high permeability. Interestingly, the in vivo behavior of both is additive and leads isavuconazonium sulfate to act like a BCS class I drug substance after oral administration. In this work, experimental solubility and dissolution data were evaluated and compared with available literature data to investigate whether it is feasible to approve immediate release solid oral dosage forms containing isavuconazonium sulfate according to official guidance from the FDA, EMA and/or ICH. The risks associated with waiving a prodrug according to the BCS-based biowaiver guidelines are reviewed and discussed, noting that current regulations are quite restrictive on this point. Further, results show high solubility but instability of isavuconazonium sulfate in aqueous media. Although experiments on the dissolution of the capsule contents confirmed 'very rapid' dissolution of the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) isavuconazonium sulfate, its release from the commercial marketed capsule formulation Cresemba is limited by the choice of capsule shell material, providing an additional impediment to approval of generic versions via the BCS-Biowaiver approach.

Drug Dissolution in Oral Drug Absorption: Workshop Report.

The in-person workshop "Drug Dissolution in Oral Drug Absorption" was held on May 23-24, 2023, in Baltimore, MD, USA. The workshop was organized into lectures and breakout sessions. Three common topics that were re-visited by various lecturers were amorphous solid dispersions (ASDs), dissolution/permeation interplay, and in vitro methods to predict in vivo biopharmaceutics performance and risk. Topics that repeatedly surfaced across breakout sessions were the following: (1) meaning and assessment of "dissolved drug," particularly of poorly water soluble drug in colloidal environments (e.g., fed conditions, ASDs); (2) potential limitations of a test that employs sink conditions for a poorly water soluble drug; (3) non-compendial methods (e.g., two-stage or multi-stage method, dissolution/permeation methods); (4) non-compendial conditions (e.g., apex vessels, non-sink conditions); and (5) potential benefit of having both a quality control method for batch release and a biopredictive/biorelevant method for biowaiver or bridging scenarios. An identified obstacle to non-compendial methods is the uncertainty of global regulatory acceptance of such methods.

Challenges in Permeability Assessment for Oral Drug Product Development.

Drug permeation across the intestinal epithelium is a prerequisite for successful oral drug delivery. The increased interest in oral administration of peptides, as well as poorly soluble and poorly permeable compounds such as drugs for targeted protein degradation, have made permeability a key parameter in oral drug product development. This review describes the various in vitro, in silico and in vivo methodologies that are applied to determine drug permeability in the human gastrointestinal tract and identifies how they are applied in the different stages of drug development. The various methods used to predict, estimate or measure permeability values, ranging from in silico and in vitro methods all the way to studies in animals and humans, are discussed with regard to their advantages, limitations and applications. A special focus is put on novel techniques such as computational approaches, gut-on-chip models and human tissue-based models, where significant progress has been made in the last few years. In addition, the impact of permeability estimations on PK predictions in PBPK modeling, the degree to which excipients can affect drug permeability in clinical studies and the requirements for colonic drug absorption are addressed.

A robust, viable, and resource sparing HPLC-based logP method applied to common drugs.

Reliable, experimentally determined partition coefficient P (logP) for most drugs are often unavailable in the literature. Many values are from in silico predictions and may not accurately reflect drug lipophilicity. In this study, a robust, viable, and resource sparing method to measure logP was developed using reverse phase high performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC). The logP of twelve common drugs was measured using calibration curves at pH 6 and 9 that were created using reference standards with well-established logP. The HPLC method reported here can be used for high throughput estimation of logP of commonly used drugs. LogP values here showed general agreement with the other few HPLC-based literature logP values available. Additionally, the HPLC-based logP values found here agreed partially with literature logP values found using other methodologies (±10%). However, there was no strong agreement since there are few experimentally determined literature logP values. This paper shows a facile method to estimate logP without using octanol or computational approaches. This method has excellent promise to provide reliable logP values of commonly used drugs available in literature. A larger pool of reliable logP values of commonly drugs has promise to improve quality of medicinal chemistry and pharmacokinetic (PK) models.

Validation of a method for itraconazole and major metabolite hydroxyitraconazole for LC-MS/MS analysis with application in a formulation clinical study.

A high-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method was developed for the analysis of itraconazole (ITZ) and hydroxyitraconazole (ITZ-OH) as part of a human pharmacokinetic study of novel tablet formulations. We demonstrated that 100 µL of plasma sample can be used with a protein precipitation extraction by optimizing different composition of acid in organic solvent for the precipitation solvent, giving comparable recovery to more time-consuming liquid-liquid or solid phase extractions. Additionally, we have shown that by monitoring the halogen isotopic peak for ITZ as well as optimizing chromatographic conditions, we are able to avoid carryover and endogenous interferences, allowing for a lower limit of quantification for our study. We validated the method to quantify ITZ and ITZ-OH from 1 to 250 ng/mL in human plasma and applied this to a formulation research clinical study (NCT04035187). This is the first itraconazole study to demonstrate robustness of the assay by performing interference testing of over-the-counter and common co-administered medications. We are also the first publication to perform incurred sample reanalysis (ISR) at the conclusion of a 672 sample clinical study to show reproducibility of assay performance.

Establishing the suitability of model-integrated evidence to demonstrate bioequivalence for long-acting injectable and implantable drug products: Summary of workshop.

On November 30, 2021, the US Food and Drug administration (FDA) and the Center for Research on Complex Generics (CRCG) hosted a virtual public workshop titled "Establishing the Suitability of Model-Integrated Evidence (MIE) to Demonstrate Bioequivalence for Long-Acting Injectable and Implantable (LAI) Drug Products." This workshop brought relevant parties from the industry, academia, and the FDA in the field of modeling and simulation to explore, identify, and recommend best practices on utilizing MIE for bioequivalence (BE) assessment of LAI products. This report summerized presentations and panel discussions for topics including challenges and opportunities in development and assessment of generic LAI products, current status of utilizing MIE, recent research progress of utilizing MIE in generic LAI products, alternative designs for BE studies of LAI products, and model validation/verification strategies associated with different types of MIE approaches.

Regulatory utility of mechanistic modeling to support alternative bioequivalence approaches: A workshop overview.

On September 30 and October 1, 2021, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Center for Research on Complex Generics cosponsored a live virtual workshop titled "Regulatory Utility of Mechanistic Modeling to Support Alternative Bioequivalence Approaches." The overall aims of the workshop included (i) engaging the generic drug industry and other involved stakeholders regarding how mechanistic modeling and simulation can support their product development and regulatory submissions; (ii) sharing the current state of mechanistic modeling for bioequivalence (BE) assessment through case studies; (iii) establishing a consensus on best practices for using mechanistic modeling approaches, such as physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling and computational fluid dynamics modeling, for BE assessment; and (iv) introducing the concept of a Model Master File to improve model sharing between model developers, industry, and the FDA. More than 1500 people registered for the workshop. Based on a postworkshop survey, the majority of participants reported that their fundamental scientific understanding of mechanistic models was enhanced, there was greater consensus on model validation and verification, and regulatory expectations for mechanistic modeling submitted in abbreviated new drug applications were clarified by the workshop.

FDA/M-CERSI Co-Processed API Workshop Proceedings.

These proceedings contain presentation summaries and discussion highlights from the University of Maryland Center of Excellence in Regulatory Science and Innovation (M-CERSI) Workshop on Co-processed API, held on July 13 and 14, 2022. This workshop examined recent advances in the use of co-processed active pharmaceutical ingredients as a technology to improve drug substance physicochemical properties and drug product manufacturing process robustness, and explored proposals for enabling commercialization of these transformative technologies. Regulatory considerations were discussed with a focus on the classification, CMC strategies, and CMC documentation supporting the use of this class of materials from clinical studies through commercialization. The workshop format was split between presentations from industry, academia and the FDA, followed by breakout sessions structured to facilitate discussion. Given co-processed API is a relatively new concept, the authors felt it prudent to compile these proceedings to gain further visibility to topics discussed and perspectives raised during the workshop, particularly during breakout discussions. Disclaimer: This paper reflects discussions that occurred among stakeholder groups, including FDA, on various topics. The topics covered in the paper, including recommendations, therefore, are intended to capture key discussion points. The paper should not be interpreted to reflect alignment on the different topics by the participants, and the recommendations provided should not be used in lieu of FDA published guidance or direct conversations with the Agency about a specific development program. This paper should not be construed to represent FDA's views or policies.