Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 20
Filter
1.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol ; 281(2): 737-742, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37548705

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The assessment of necrotizing external otitis requires a high index of suspicion by the attending physician. The purpose of the study is to determine the accuracy of parameters available at the Emergency Department for the diagnosis of this pathology. METHODS: Retrospective diagnostic accuracy study. Patients consulting at the Emergency Department for longstanding ear swelling, severe otalgia, and failure to respond to topical treatment were included. Otoscopy, physical examination, CT appearance, and analytical results were tested for the diagnosis of necrotizing external otitis, using nuclear imaging as gold standard. Sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios and ROC curves were calculated. RESULTS: 24 patients were included; 13 cases were necrotizing external otitis, and 11 cases were other external ear pathologies. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein levels were significantly associated with necrotizing external otitis (AUC 0.92 p < 0.001, and 0.8 p < 0.001). Positive likelihood ratios were 10.15 for values of erythrocyte sedimentation rate over 26 mm/h, and 8.25 for C-reactive protein levels over 10 mg/L. Negative likelihood ratios were 0.08 and 0.28, respectively. These results were significant. The rest of clinical and radiological parameters were less accurate. CONCLUSIONS: Erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein are useful parameters in the evaluation of a case of longstanding otitis with clinical suspicion of necrotizing external otitis. If any of them is elevated, the probability of suffering this condition is significantly increased. If they are within normal ranges, an alternative diagnosis should be sought.


Subject(s)
Otitis Externa , Humans , Otitis Externa/diagnosis , Otitis Externa/drug therapy , Retrospective Studies , C-Reactive Protein , Ear, External/pathology , Emergency Service, Hospital
2.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36906066

ABSTRACT

At this time, we still do not have adequate knowledge and awareness of the consequences of hearing loss in the elderly on quality of life. Similarly, there is also insufficient information on the relationship of presbycusis and balance disorders with other comorbidities. Such knowledge can contribute to improve both prevention and treatment of these pathologies, to reduce their impact on other areas such as cognition or autonomy, as well as to have more accurate information on the economic impact they generate in society and in the health system. Therefore, with this review article we aim to update the information on the type of hearing loss and balance disorders in people over 55 years of age, and their associated factors; to analyze the impact on the quality of life of these people and the one which can be generated at a personal and population level (both sociological and economic) if an early intervention in these patients is pursued.


Subject(s)
Deafness , Presbycusis , Humans , Aged , Presbycusis/therapy , Presbycusis/epidemiology , Quality of Life , Cognition
3.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol ; 279(10): 4745-4759, 2022 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35044508

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: (a) To measure the change in cognition, the improvement of speech perception, and the subjective benefit in people under and over 60 years following cochlear implantation. (b) To assess the relationship between cognition, demographic, audiometric, and subjective outcomes in both age groups. METHODS: 28 cochlear implant (CI) users were assigned to the < 60y group and 35 to the ≥ 60y group. Cognition was measured using the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status for Hearing impaired individuals (RBANS-H); subjective benefit was measured using the Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire (NCIQ); the Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI); the Hearing Implant Sound Quality Index (HISQUI19); Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ12); and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). RESULTS: Prior to surgery: the RBANS-H total score positively correlated with the domains "Advanced sound", "Self-esteem", and "Social functioning" of NCIQ, and negatively with HADS scores. 12 months post-implantation: the RBANS-H total score increased in the < 60y (p = 0.038) and in the ≥ 60y group (p < 0.001); speech perception and subjective outcomes also improved; RBANS-H total score positively correlated with "Self-esteem" domain in NCIQ. Age and the RBANS-H total score correlated negatively in the ≥ 60y group (p = 0.026). CONCLUSIONS: After implantation, both age groups demonstrated improved cognition, speech perception and quality of life. Their depression scores decreased. Age was inversely associated with cognition.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Cognitive Dysfunction , Hearing Loss , Speech Perception , Aged , Cochlear Implantation/psychology , Cognitive Dysfunction/etiology , Hearing Loss/psychology , Hearing Loss/surgery , Humans , Quality of Life/psychology , Treatment Outcome
4.
Ear Hear ; 41(6): 1648-1659, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33136639

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Cochlear implants (CIs) are a well-known hearing restoration option for patients with vestibular schwannoma (VS) in cases of neurofibromatosis type-2 and, more recently, for patients with sporadic VS. One of the main limitations when performing CI during VS surgery is the capability to preserve the acoustic nerve (AN) anatomically and functionally. Significant efforts have been directed toward developing an intraoperative testing method for monitoring the AN function to determine if, after tumor removal, it is suitable for conducting stimuli delivered by a CI. However, all these methods have significant limitations, and none of them have documented diagnostic efficacy. To overcome these limitations and to obtain reliable information before CI insertion, a minimally invasive intracochlear test electrode (TE) has been recently developed. This TE has demonstrated to be suitable to test the integrity of the AN before CI in patients without any residual hearing by recording electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses (EABR). The present study constitutes the next phase of this research, which was to determine the usefulness of EABR obtained intraoperatively with the intracochlear TE after the resection of a VS and to calculate its diagnostic accuracy to assess the functionality of the AN for CI. DESIGN: This was a prospective, multicenter study of diagnostic accuracy. It was conducted in three tertiary referral centers between January 2015 and 2018. This study was designed following the Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (STARD) statement guidelines. The STARD statement are guidelines to improve the completeness and transparency of reports of diagnostic accuracy studies. The diagnostic accuracy of the EABR evoked with the intracochlear TE after tumor removal was studied. Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were calculated. Patients eligible for the study were consecutive adults undergoing surgery for VS with simultaneous CI. The test under evaluation (index test) was the EABR obtained with the intracochlear TE after resection of the tumor. The reference test (gold standard) was the presence of auditory perception with the CI, defined as the presence of sound detection on an audiogram at 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz of no greater than 50 dB. In all the cases, auditory perception was verified by the presence of a positive EABR evoked with the CI. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients were included during the study period; seven patients were excluded from the diagnostic efficacy analysis due to inconclusive EABR results or absence of the gold standard to compare (they did not finally receive the CI). Thus, the outcome of the gold standard was assessed in 14 cases: 9 cases had positive EABR, all of them obtained auditory perception with the CI, and 5 cases had negative EABR, only one case had auditory perception with the CI, which constitutes the only false negative of this study. Accuracy of the TE was 93% (95% confidence interval, 66 to 100%), sensitivity 90% (95% confidence interval, 71 to 100%), specificity 100% (95% confidence interval, 100 to 100%), positive predictive value 100% (95% confidence interval, 100 to 100%), and negative predictive value 80% (95% confidence interval, 45 to 100%). CONCLUSIONS: EABR elicited with the intracochlear TE had a diagnostic accuracy of 93% for predicting auditory perception with CIs after VS removal. These results suggest that the intracochlear TE can be used intraoperatively after tumor removal to test the integrity of the AN as a useful tool to complement the surgeon's perception for decision-making regarding implantation.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Neuroma, Acoustic , Adult , Cochlear Nerve , Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem , Humans , Neuroma, Acoustic/diagnosis , Neuroma, Acoustic/surgery , Prospective Studies
5.
Acta otorrinolaringol. esp ; 71(2): 99-118, mar.-abr. 2020. tab, ilus
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-192447

ABSTRACT

La parálisis de Bell es la forma más común de paresia o parálisis facial. Sin embargo, no todos los pacientes con parálisis facial tienen una parálisis de Bell. Otras causas frecuentes incluyen las secuelas del tratamiento del neurinoma del VIII par, el cáncer de cabeza y cuello, la iatrogenia, el zóster ótico y los traumatismos. El abordaje de cada una de estas situaciones es totalmente diferente. El objetivo de esta guía es servir de consejo para el tratamiento y el seguimiento de los pacientes con parálisis facial. Nuestra idea es que la guía sea práctica, haciendo hincapié en recomendaciones efectivas y útiles en el manejo diario de los pacientes. Esta guía ha sido promovida por la Sociedad Española de ORL y escrita por médicos con experiencia en la enfermedad del nervio facial, incluyendo al menos un especialista de cada comunidad autónoma. Redactada en un formato de preguntas y respuestas, incluye 56 cuestiones relevantes relacionadas con el nervio facial


Bell's palsy is the most common diagnosis associated with facial nerve weakness or paralysis. However, not all patients with facial paresis/paralysis have Bell's palsy. Other common causes include treatment of vestibular schwannoma, head and neck tumours, iatrogenic injuries, Herpes zoster, or trauma. The approach to each of these conditions varies widely. The purpose of this guideline is to provide clinicians with guidance on the treatment and monitoring of patients with different causes of facial paralysis. We intend to draft a practical guideline, focusing on operationalised recommendations deemed to be useful in the daily management of patients. This guideline was promoted by the Spanish Society of Otolaryngology and developed by a group of physicians with an interest in facial nerve disorders, including at least one physician from each Autonomous Community. In a question and answer format, it includes 56 relevant topics related to the facial nerve


Subject(s)
Humans , Facial Paralysis/diagnosis , Facial Paralysis/therapy , Societies, Medical/standards , Otolaryngology/methods , Bell Palsy/etiology , Spain , Facial Nerve/physiopathology , Facial Paralysis/etiology
6.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31097197

ABSTRACT

Bell's palsy is the most common diagnosis associated with facial nerve weakness or paralysis. However, not all patients with facial paresis/paralysis have Bell's palsy. Other common causes include treatment of vestibular schwannoma, head and neck tumours, iatrogenic injuries, Herpes zoster, or trauma. The approach to each of these conditions varies widely. The purpose of this guideline is to provide clinicians with guidance on the treatment and monitoring of patients with different causes of facial paralysis. We intend to draft a practical guideline, focusing on operationalised recommendations deemed to be useful in the daily management of patients. This guideline was promoted by the Spanish Society of Otolaryngology and developed by a group of physicians with an interest in facial nerve disorders, including at least one physician from each Autonomous Community. In a question and answer format, it includes 56 relevant topics related to the facial nerve.


Subject(s)
Bell Palsy/therapy , Facial Paralysis/therapy , Otolaryngology , Societies, Medical , Age Factors , Bell Palsy/diagnosis , Diagnosis, Differential , Diagnostic Imaging , Emergencies , Facial Paralysis/diagnosis , Facial Paralysis/etiology , Female , Humans , Ophthalmology , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications/drug therapy , Referral and Consultation , Spain
7.
Otol Neurotol ; 40(10): e947-e954, 2019 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31725590

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To perform translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and validation of the hearing handicap inventory for adults scale (HHIA) to the Spanish language. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective study. SETTING: Tertiary neurotologic referral center. PATIENTS: The study included 104 hearing impaired persons. Inclusion criteria were adults with untreated hearing loss, diagnosed in the past 12 months. A control group of 30 normal hearing subjects was also recruited. INTERVENTION: HHIA was translated and translated back, and a pretest trial was performed. Feasibility, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, construct validity, and ceiling and floor effects were assessed for the present study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The mean overall score of the HHIA was 31.9 (0-100 scale, lowest to highest handicap). Cronbach's α was 0.95. Intraclass correlation coefficient was performed for each item, with an overall score of 0.95. The k coefficient scores ranged between moderate and almost perfect in all patients. The emotional score of the HHIA was correlated with the mental component of the SF-12. CONCLUSIONS: Feasibility, internal consistency, reliability, and construct validity outcomes in the current study support the validity of the Spanish version of the HHIA.


Subject(s)
Hearing Loss/diagnosis , Language , Psychometrics/instrumentation , Surveys and Questionnaires , Translating , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Reproducibility of Results
8.
Hear Res ; 379: 103-116, 2019 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31150955

ABSTRACT

Many users of bilateral cochlear implants (BiCIs) localize sound sources less accurately than do people with normal hearing. This may be partly due to using two independently functioning CIs with fixed compression, which distorts and/or reduces interaural level differences (ILDs). Here, we investigate the potential benefits of using binaurally coupled, dynamic compression inspired by the medial olivocochlear reflex; an approach termed "the MOC strategy" (Lopez-Poveda et al., 2016, Ear Hear 37:e138-e148). Twelve BiCI users were asked to localize wideband (125-6000 Hz) noise tokens in a virtual horizontal plane. Stimuli were processed through a standard (STD) sound processing strategy (i.e., involving two independently functioning sound processors with fixed compression) and three different implementations of the MOC strategy: one with fast (MOC1) and two with slower contralateral control of compression (MOC2 and MOC3). The MOC1 and MOC2 strategies had effectively greater inhibition in the higher than in the lower frequency channels, while the MOC3 strategy had slightly greater inhibition in the lower than in the higher frequency channels. Localization was most accurate with the MOC1 strategy, presumably because it provided the largest and less ambiguous ILDs. The angle error improved slightly from 25.3° with the STD strategy to 22.7° with the MOC1 strategy. The improvement in localization ability over the STD strategy disappeared when the contralateral control of compression was made slower, presumably because stimuli were too short (200 ms) for the slower contralateral inhibition to enhance ILDs. Results suggest that some MOC implementations hold promise for improving not only speech-in-noise intelligibility, as shown elsewhere, but also sound source lateralization.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implants , Sound Localization/physiology , Acoustic Stimulation , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Basilar Membrane/physiopathology , Cochlear Implants/statistics & numerical data , Data Compression , Electronic Data Processing , Female , Hearing Loss, Bilateral/physiopathology , Hearing Loss, Bilateral/rehabilitation , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Organ of Corti/physiopathology , Reflex, Acoustic/physiology , Superior Olivary Complex/physiopathology
9.
Hear Res ; 377: 133-141, 2019 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30933705

ABSTRACT

The detection of amplitude modulation (AM) in quiet or in noise improves when the AM carrier is preceded by noise, an effect that has been attributed to the medial olivocochlear reflex (MOCR). We investigate whether this improvement can occur without the MOCR by measuring AM sensitivity for cochlear implant (CI) users, whose MOCR effects are circumvented as a result of the electrical stimulation provided by the CI. AM detection thresholds were measured monaurally for short (50 ms) AM probes presented at the onset (early condition) or delayed by 300 ms (late condition) from the onset of a broadband noise. The noise was presented ipsilaterally, contralaterally and bilaterally to the test ear. Stimuli were processed through an experimental, time-invariant sound processing strategy. On average, thresholds were 4 dB better in the late than in the early condition and the size of the improvement was similar for the three noise lateralities. The pattern and magnitude of the improvement was broadly consistent with that for normal hearing listeners [Marrufo-Pérez et al., 2018, J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 19:147-161]. Because the electrical stimulation provided by CIs is independent from the middle-ear muscle reflex (MEMR) or the MOCR, this shows that mechanisms other than the MEMR or the MOCR can facilitate AM detection in noisy backgrounds.


Subject(s)
Auditory Perception , Cochlear Implantation/instrumentation , Cochlear Implants , Noise/adverse effects , Persons With Hearing Impairments/rehabilitation , Acoustic Stimulation , Adaptation, Psychological , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Auditory Threshold , Child , Cochlea/innervation , Electric Stimulation , Female , Hearing , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Perceptual Masking , Persons With Hearing Impairments/psychology , Reflex , Superior Olivary Complex/physiopathology , Time Factors
10.
Otol Neurotol ; 38(8): e248-e252, 2017 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28806334

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The role of long-term hearing deprivation in cochlear implant performance is not well established, and the limits for implanting an auditory deprived ear are still unknown. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of long-term auditory deprivation time on cochlear implant results. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case review study. SETTING: Cochlear implantation tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Adult patients with postlingual deafness. INTERVENTION: Unilateral cochlear implantation between 2001 and January 2015. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Age at implantation, sex, etiology of hearing loss, and duration of auditory deprivation in the implanted ear were collected. Cochlear implants results were expressed in terms of vowel identification, disyllabic word recognition, and sentence recognition.Spearman's correlation test was applied to determine the relationship between auditory deprivation time and speech recognition scores. Additionally, patients were divided according to their auditory deprivation time before implantation in group A (less than 10 yr) and group B (more than 10 yr). RESULTS: One hundred three patients met inclusion criteria for this study. There were 61 patients in group A, with a mean deprivation time of 2.52 years. There were 42 patients in group B, with a mean deprivation time of 19.67 years.There were no statistically significant differences between both groups regarding speech recognition scores.Deprivation time in the implanted ear was not statistically correlated with cochlear implantation performance. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term auditory deprivation in the ear to be implanted does not negatively influence cochlear implantation results and should not be considered criterion to reject cochlear implantation.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Deafness/surgery , Speech Perception , Adolescent , Adult , Cochlear Implantation/methods , Cochlear Implants , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
12.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 156(4): 728-734, 2017 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28116984

ABSTRACT

Objective To perform translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and validation of the Penn Acoustic Neuroma Quality-of-Life Scale (PANQOL) to the Spanish language. Study Design Prospective study. Setting Tertiary neurotologic referral center. Subjects and Methods PANQOL was translated and translated back, and a pretest trial was performed. The study included 27 individuals diagnosed with vestibular schwannoma. Inclusion criteria were adults with untreated vestibular schwannoma, diagnosed in the past 12 months. Feasibility, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, construct validity, and ceiling and floor effects were assessed for the present study. Results The mean overall score of the PANQOL was 69.21 (0-100 scale, lowest to highest quality of life). Cronbach's α was 0.87. Intraclass correlation coefficient was performed for each item, with an overall score of 0.92. The κ coefficient scores were between moderate and almost perfect in more than 92% of patients. Anxiety and energy domains of the PANQOL were correlated with both physical and mental components of the SF-12. Hearing, balance, and pain domains were correlated with the SF-12 physical component. Facial and general domains were not significantly correlated with any component of the SF-12. Furthermore, the overall score of the PANQOL was correlated with the physical component of the SF-12. Conclusion Feasibility, internal consistency, reliability, and construct validity outcomes in the current study support the validity of the Spanish version of the PANQOL.


Subject(s)
Hispanic or Latino , Neuroma, Acoustic , Quality of Life , Surveys and Questionnaires , Translations , Adult , Aged , Culture , Feasibility Studies , Female , Hearing Loss/etiology , Humans , Language , Male , Middle Aged , Neuroma, Acoustic/complications , Neuroma, Acoustic/psychology , Prospective Studies , Tinnitus/etiology
13.
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol ; 125(6): 485-94, 2016 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26658067

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to review the indications for subtotal petrosectomy for cochlear implantation, report our management of complications, as well as review those technical factors that are critical for successful implantation. METHODS: Patients (n = 104) that underwent subtotal petrosectomy with closure of the external auditory canal and obliteration of the cavity with abdominal fat in combination with cochlear implantation were analyzed. RESULTS: The most frequent indication for subtotal petrosectomy was the existence of a previous canal wall down technique. Postoperative complications occurred in 13 patients (11.83%). Extrusion of the device took place in 5 cases (4.55%). CONCLUSIONS: Subtotal petrosectomy in cochlear implantation permits obtaining a cavity isolated from the external environment, and when needed, it improves the access and visibility during the surgical procedure. Subtotal petrosectomy is a safe technique, with a low rate of complications.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation/methods , Ear Canal/surgery , Ear, Middle/surgery , Petrous Bone/surgery , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Prosthesis Failure , Retrospective Studies , Temporal Bone/surgery , Young Adult
14.
Audiol Neurootol ; 21(6): 391-398, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28319951

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: While hearing aids for a contralateral routing of signals (CROS-HA) and bone conduction devices have been the traditional treatment for single-sided deafness (SSD) and asymmetric hearing loss (AHL), in recent years, cochlear implants (CIs) have increasingly become a viable treatment choice, particularly in countries where regulatory approval and reimbursement schemes are in place. Part of the reason for this shift is that the CI is the only device capable of restoring bilateral input to the auditory system and hence of possibly reinstating binaural hearing. Although several studies have independently shown that the CI is a safe and effective treatment for SSD and AHL, clinical outcome measures in those studies and across CI centers vary greatly. Only with a consistent use of defined and agreed-upon outcome measures across centers can high-level evidence be generated to assess the safety and efficacy of CIs and alternative treatments in recipients with SSD and AHL. METHODS: This paper presents a comparative study design and minimum outcome measures for the assessment of current treatment options in patients with SSD/AHL. The protocol was developed, discussed, and eventually agreed upon by expert panels that convened at the 2015 APSCI conference in Beijing, China, and at the CI 2016 conference in Toronto, Canada. RESULTS: A longitudinal study design comparing CROS-HA, BCD, and CI treatments is proposed. The recommended outcome measures include (1) speech in noise testing, using the same set of 3 spatial configurations to compare binaural benefits such as summation, squelch, and head shadow across devices; (2) localization testing, using stimuli that rove in both level and spectral content; (3) questionnaires to collect quality of life measures and the frequency of device use; and (4) questionnaires for assessing the impact of tinnitus before and after treatment, if applicable. CONCLUSION: A protocol for the assessment of treatment options and outcomes in recipients with SSD and AHL is presented. The proposed set of minimum outcome measures aims at harmonizing assessment methods across centers and thus at generating a growing body of high-level evidence for those treatment options.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation/methods , Consensus , Deafness/rehabilitation , Hearing Aids , Hearing Loss, Unilateral/rehabilitation , Speech Perception , Cochlear Implants , Deafness/physiopathology , Hearing Loss, Unilateral/physiopathology , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Noise , Prospective Studies , Quality of Life , Sound Localization , Surveys and Questionnaires , Tinnitus , Treatment Outcome
16.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol ; 272(1): 35-41, 2015 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24292213

ABSTRACT

Cochlear implantation through the standard posterior tympanotomy approach may sometimes be challenging. In cases with complicated anatomy or malformations, an alternative surgical technique may be chosen. The transattical approach is a simple technique based on a mastoidectomy and a transmeatal cochleostomy. The electrode is driven to the middle ear through the attic. This way it overcomes some of the standard technique's drawbacks. Our aim is to assess the value of this alternative approach in cochlear implant surgery. We conducted a comparative retrospective study; we included 74 patients operated by transattical approach and 59 patients operated with the standard technique. Auditory performance and complications at long term follow-up were compared. The consequences of the different trajectory of the electrode in the transattical approach were also studied. No significant differences were found between both groups regarding complication rates and cochlear implant performance. The electrode's integrity was not significantly affected by its different position and angles, when compared to the standard approach. We conclude that transattical approach is a safe technique for cochlear implantation. It may be considered as an alternative to the posterior tympanotomy approach for those cases where this cannot be performed.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation/methods , Adult , Child, Preschool , Cochlear Implants , Female , Humans , Intraoperative Complications , Male , Postoperative Complications , Retrospective Studies
17.
Am J Otolaryngol ; 35(5): 558-64, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24989154

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Several studies support the use of cochlear implants (CI) in far-advanced otosclerosis (FAO). MATERIAL AND METHODS: We compared our results of CI in patients with FAO and unknown origin hearing loss (UOHL) and our incidence of facial electrical stimulation and difficult insertion of the electrode bundle up to 3 to 5 years from surgery. RESULTS: We found 17 patients with CI in FAO and UOHL. FAO patients achieved better results on the pure tone average (PTA) and recognition of monosyllables by GEE test (p=0.022; p=0.006), and particularly at 1 year on the PTA (p=0.002), at 6 months and a year in monosyllables (p=0.002; p=0.001), and at 6 months in disyllables (p=0.004). There were no differences toward complications. CONCLUSION: In our experience, placement of CI in FAO has proven successful, with results comparable to other similar cohorts, and with low complications.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation/methods , Cochlear Implants , Otosclerosis/surgery , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Speech Perception/physiology , Treatment Outcome
19.
Acta otorrinolaringol. esp ; 63(1): 15-20, ene.-feb. 2012. tab, graf
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-96267

ABSTRACT

Introducción y objetivos: Valorar la eficacia del implante coclear en pacientes con hipoacusia súbita unilateral y acúfeno incapacitante asociado. Métodos: Se han implantado 10 pacientes con hipoacusia súbita severa-profunda unilateral y acúfeno asociado, entre los cuales 4 son varones y 6 mujeres, con media de edad a la implantación de 42,7 años (rango: 34-62). Hemos evaluado la severidad del acúfeno mediante el Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) en su versión validada al castellano y una escala analógica visual pre y postimplantación. Resultados: Se ha observado una supresión del acúfeno en dos pacientes. Siete pacientes han experimentado una mejoría del THI en distintos grados y no se han producido cambios en un paciente. No ha habido empeoramiento del acúfeno en ningún caso de la serie estudiada. Conclusiones: La reducción del acúfeno tras implantación coclear se puede deber a varios mecanismos, tales como la habituación, enmascaramiento acústico, estimulación directa del nervio coclear y reorganización de las áreas corticales. Aunque sean precisos más estudios, el implante coclear es un método efectivo para el tratamiento del acúfeno incapacitante en pacientes con hipoacusia súbita severa-profunda unilateral(AU)


Introduction and objectives: To assess the efficacy of cochlear implantation in patients with unilateral sudden sensorineural hearing loss and associated disabling tinnitus. Methods: Ten patients suffering from severe-to-profound sudden hearing loss and tinnitus in the affected ear received implants. The sample was comprised of 4 men and 6 women, with a mean age of 42.7 years (range 34-62) at implantation. The severity of the tinnitus was evaluated with the Spanish validated version of the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) and a visual analogue scale. These assessments were obtained before and after implantation. Results: Tinnitus suppression was observed in 2 patients. In 7 cases, we observed an improvement in the THI, in different degrees, and 1 patient remained without changes. Tinnitus worsening was not found in the series studied. Conclusions: Tinnitus reduction following cochlear implantation can be explained by several mechanisms, such as habituation, acoustic masking, direct stimulation of the cochlear nerve and reorganisation of cortical areas. Even though further research is required, cochlear implantation is an effective method for the treatment of disabling tinnitus in patients with severe-to-profound unilateral sudden sensorineural hearing loss(AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Cochlear Implantation , Hearing Loss, Sudden/surgery , Tinnitus/surgery , Treatment Outcome
20.
Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp ; 63(1): 15-20, 2012.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22136970

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy of cochlear implantation in patients with unilateral sudden sensorineural hearing loss and associated disabling tinnitus. METHODS: Ten patients suffering from severe-to-profound sudden hearing loss and tinnitus in the affected ear received implants. The sample was comprised of 4 men and 6 women, with a mean age of 42.7 years (range 34-62) at implantation. The severity of the tinnitus was evaluated with the Spanish validated version of the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) and a visual analogue scale. These assessments were obtained before and after implantation. RESULTS: Tinnitus suppression was observed in 2 patients. In 7 cases, we observed an improvement in the THI, in different degrees, and 1 patient remained without changes. Tinnitus worsening was not found in the series studied. CONCLUSIONS: Tinnitus reduction following cochlear implantation can be explained by several mechanisms, such as habituation, acoustic masking, direct stimulation of the cochlear nerve and reorganisation of cortical areas. Even though further research is required, cochlear implantation is an effective method for the treatment of disabling tinnitus in patients with severe-to-profound unilateral sudden sensorineural hearing loss.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implants , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/complications , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/surgery , Tinnitus/etiology , Tinnitus/surgery , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Severity of Illness Index
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...