Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Drug Res (Stuttg) ; 64(5): 257-62, 2014 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24105103

ABSTRACT

Two bioequivalence studies of irbesartan (CAS 138402-11-6) and hydrochlorothiazide (CAS 58-93-5) combination at 300/12.5 mg and 300/25 mg strengths were carried out in order to assess the bioequivalence of these film-coated tablet formulations in comparison with the marketed reference formulations.Both studies were performed with 30 healthy volunteers according to an open label, randomized, 2-period, 2-sequence, crossover, single dose and fasting conditions design. In each study, test and reference formulations were administered in 2 treatment days, separated by a washout period of 7 days. Blood samples were drawn up to 72 h following drug administration in case of irbesartan and up to 24 h in case of hydrochlorothiazide. Plasma concentrations of both analytes were obtained by a validated HPLC method using MS/MS detection. Log-transformed AUC0-t and Cmax values were tested for bioequivalence based on the ratios of the geometric LSmeans (test/reference).For both studies, the 90% confidence intervals of the geometric LSmean values for the test/reference ratios for AUC0-t [(irbesartan: 300/12.5 mgstrength: 95.33-111.74%. 300/25 mg strength: 91.27-103.93%) (hydrochlorothiazide: 300/12.5 mg strength: 99.63-107.50%. 300/25 mg strength: 95.72-102.24%)] and Cmax [(irbesartan: 300/12.5 mg strength: 98.73-115.03%. 300/25 mg strength: 97.27-112.12%) (hydrochlorothiazide: 300/12.5 mg strength: 97.34-112.06%. 300/25 mg strength: 93.29-106.38%)] were within the bio-equivalence acceptance range of 80-125%.According to the European Guideline on the Investigation of Bioequivalence it may be therefore concluded that both test formulations are bioequivalent to the corresponding reference formulations. Overall, it was judged that both studies were conducted with a good tolerance of the subjects to study drugs.


Subject(s)
Biphenyl Compounds/administration & dosage , Biphenyl Compounds/pharmacokinetics , Hydrochlorothiazide/administration & dosage , Hydrochlorothiazide/pharmacokinetics , Tablets/administration & dosage , Tablets/pharmacokinetics , Tetrazoles/administration & dosage , Tetrazoles/pharmacokinetics , Adult , Area Under Curve , Cross-Over Studies , Drug Combinations , Female , Healthy Volunteers , Humans , Irbesartan , Male , Therapeutic Equivalency
2.
Drug Res (Stuttg) ; 64(1): 53-6, 2014 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24048950

ABSTRACT

A bioequivalence study of 2 irbesartan (CAS 138402-11-6) film-coated tablet formulations was carried out in 40 healthy volunteers according to an open label, randomized, 2-period, 2-sequence, crossover, single dose and fasting conditions design. The test and reference formulations were administered in 2 treatment days, separated by a washout period of 7 days. Blood samples were drawn up to 96 h following drug administration. Plasma concentrations of irbesartan were obtained by a validated HPLC method using MS/MS detection. Log-transformed AUC0-t and Cmax values were tested for bioequivalence based on the ratios of the geometric LSmeans (test/reference). tmax was analysed nonparametrically. The 90% confidence intervals of the geometric LSmean values for the test/reference ratios for AUC0-t (98.06-109.48%, point estimator 103.61%) and Cmax (88.93-100.87%, point estimator 94.72%) were within the bioequivalence acceptance range of 80-125%. According to the European Guideline on the Investigation of Bioequivalence it may be therefore concluded that test formulation of irbesartan 300 mg film-coated tablet is bioequivalent to the reference formulation. Overall, it was judged that the study was conducted with a good tolerance of the subjects to both study drugs.


Subject(s)
Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers/pharmacokinetics , Biphenyl Compounds/pharmacokinetics , Tetrazoles/pharmacokinetics , Administration, Oral , Adult , Analysis of Variance , Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers/administration & dosage , Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers/adverse effects , Area Under Curve , Biphenyl Compounds/administration & dosage , Biphenyl Compounds/adverse effects , Chemistry, Pharmaceutical , Cross-Over Studies , Female , Humans , Irbesartan , Male , Middle Aged , Sample Size , Tablets, Enteric-Coated , Tandem Mass Spectrometry , Tetrazoles/administration & dosage , Tetrazoles/adverse effects , Therapeutic Equivalency , Young Adult
3.
Arzneimittelforschung ; 62(10): 482-6, 2012 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22918855

ABSTRACT

A bioequivalence study of 2 zolmitriptan (CAS 139264-17-8) orodispersible tablet formulations was carried out in 26 healthy volunteers according to an open label, randomized, 2-period, 2-sequence, crossover, single dose and fasting conditions design. The test and reference formulations were administered in 2 treatment days, separated by a washout period of 7 days. Plasma concentrations of zolmitriptan and its active metabolite (N-desmethyl-zolmitriptan) were obtained by LC/MS/MS method. Log-transformed AUCs and Cmax values were tested for bioequivalence based on the ratios of the geometric means (test/reference). Tmax was analysed nonparametrically. The 90% confidence intervals of the geometric mean values for the test/reference ratios for AUC0-t and Cmax were within the bioequivalence acceptance range of 80-125%. According to the European Guideline 1 it may be therefore concluded that test formulation of zolmitriptan 5 mg orodispersible tablet is bioequivalent to the reference formulation.


Subject(s)
Oxazolidinones/pharmacology , Serotonin Receptor Agonists/pharmacology , Tryptamines/pharmacology , Administration, Oral , Adolescent , Adult , Area Under Curve , Chemistry, Pharmaceutical , Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid , Cross-Over Studies , Databases, Factual , Double-Blind Method , Female , Half-Life , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Oxazolidinones/administration & dosage , Oxazolidinones/pharmacokinetics , Serotonin Receptor Agonists/administration & dosage , Serotonin Receptor Agonists/pharmacokinetics , Tablets , Tandem Mass Spectrometry , Therapeutic Equivalency , Tryptamines/administration & dosage , Tryptamines/pharmacokinetics , Young Adult
4.
Arzneimittelforschung ; 62(2): 59-62, 2012 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22344549

ABSTRACT

This study was designed to compare the rate and extent of absorption of 2 oral formulations of ondansetron (CAS 99614-02-5) 8 mg orodispersible tablets in healthy volunteers. 22 subjects were administered ondansetron orodispersible tablets of test and reference formulation in a single-dose, 2-period, 2-sequence, fasting, open-label, crossover and randomised study. Plasma concentrations were determined by LC/MS/MS. Log-transformed AUCs and Cmax values were tested for bioequivalence based on the ratios of the geometric means (test/reference). Tmax was analysed nonparametrically. The 90% confidence intervals of the geometric mean values for the test/reference ratios for AUC0-t and Cmax were within the bioequivalence acceptance range of 80-125%. According to the European Guideline [1] it may be therefore concluded that test formulation of ondansetron 8 mg orodispersible tablet is bioequivalent to the reference formulation.


Subject(s)
Antiemetics/pharmacokinetics , Ondansetron/pharmacokinetics , Adolescent , Adult , Antiemetics/administration & dosage , Antiemetics/adverse effects , Area Under Curve , Biological Availability , Chemistry, Pharmaceutical , Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid , Cross-Over Studies , Double-Blind Method , Female , Half-Life , Humans , Male , Ondansetron/administration & dosage , Ondansetron/adverse effects , Sample Size , Tandem Mass Spectrometry , Therapeutic Equivalency , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...