Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Arch Med Sci ; 17(6): 1618-1627, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34900041

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The aim of the study was to estimate the overall survival of patients with EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer treated with erlotinib, gefitinib or afatinib. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Real-world patients who received afatinib, erlotinib or gefitinib between 1 July 2012 and 30 October 2017 were analysed in five subgroups. RESULTS: Among 267 patients treated with afatinib financed as the first line of treatment, 76 (28.46%) deaths occurred. Median observation time was 12.8 months (95% CI: 11.2-13.9). Median OS was 22.8 months (95% CI: 19.2-27.1). Among 83 patients who received erlotinib financed exclusively as the second line of treatment the number of deaths was 74 (89.16%). Median observation time was 64.3 months (95% CI: 60.4-64.6). Median OS was 16 months (95% CI: 13.2-22.9). Among 622 patients who received erlotinib financed both as first and second line treatment, there were 400 (64.3%) deaths. Median observation time was 33.3 months (95% CI: 31.2-37.6). Median OS was 17.8 months (95% CI: 16.4-19.7). Among 137 patients who received gefitinib financed only as the first line of treatment, there were 128 (93.4%) deaths. Median observation time was 58.3 months (95% CI: 49.4-62.5). Median OS was 16 months (95% CI: 13.8-19.7). Among 348 patients who received gefitinib financed both as the first and second line of treatment the number of deaths was 208 (59.8%). Median observation time was 23.7 months (95% CI: 20.7-28.7). Median OS was 15.5 months (95% CI: 12.9-17.5). CONCLUSIONS: Our real-world data regarding OS confirm the benefits found in clinical trials from the use of afatinib, erlotinib or gefitinib. However, the lower overall survival rate of Polish patients compared to similar studies from other research centres suggests the need for deeper investigation of this issue.

2.
Med Sci Monit ; 25: 3846-3853, 2019 May 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31121600

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND This study aimed to undertake an analysis of ten years of real-world evidence (RWE) on overall survival (OS) following treatment of advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) with imatinib, sunitinib, and sorafenib using data from the Polish National Health Fund. MATERIAL AND METHODS Data from the Polish National Health Fund, the sole Polish public payer, identified 1,641 patients with advanced GIST who were treated with imatinib (n=1047), sunitinib (n=457), and sorafenib (n=137). The differences in overall survival (OS) were analyzed. RESULTS For patients with advanced GIST, the median follow-up time for patients treated with imatinib was 71 months (95% CI, 64.8-79.2), the median OS was 56.9 months (95% CI, 50.4-61.2), with survival at 12 months (89.5%), 24 months (77.9%), 36 months (66.9%), and 60 months (48.4%). The median follow-up time for patients treated with sunitinib was 41.4 months (95% CI, 34.6-49.3), the median OS was 22.8 months (95% CI, 19.2-26.8), with survival at 12 months (68.2%), 24 months (47.1%), and 36 months (31%). The median follow-up time for patients treated with sorafenib was 17.4 months (95% CI, 14.6-22.9), the median OS was 16.9 months (95% CI, 13.7-24.3), with survival at 12 months (61.9%), at 24 months (36.2%), and at 36 months (16.8%). CONCLUSIONS Real-world data collected in a ten-year period confirmed the effectiveness of the use of imatinib, sunitinib, or sorafenib for the treatment of advanced GIST and was comparable with the findings from clinical trials.


Subject(s)
Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors/drug therapy , Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors/pathology , Adult , Aged , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Benzamides/therapeutic use , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors/immunology , Humans , Imatinib Mesylate/therapeutic use , Indoles/therapeutic use , Male , Middle Aged , Poland , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Public Health Practice , Pyrroles/therapeutic use , Sorafenib/therapeutic use , Sunitinib/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome
3.
Postepy Hig Med Dosw (Online) ; 70: 186-93, 2016 Mar 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26943316

ABSTRACT

Cigarette smoking is the leading risk factor of lung cancer. Data from several clinical studies suggest that continuation of smoking during therapy of tobacco-related cancers is associated with lower response rates to chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy, and even with decreased survival. Although nicotine--an addictive component of tobacco--is not a carcinogen, it may influence cancer development and progression or effectiveness of anti-cancer therapy. Several in vitro and in vivo trials have evaluated the influence of nicotine on lung cancer cells. The best known mechanisms by which nicotine impacts cancer biology involve suppression of apoptosis induced by certain drugs or radiation, promotion of proliferation, angiogenesis, invasion and migration of cancer cells. This effect is mainly mediated by membranous nicotinic acetylcholine receptors whose stimulation leads to sustained activation of such intracellular pathways as PI3K/Akt/mTOR, RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK and JAK/STAT, induction of NF-κB activity, enhanced transcription of mitogenic promoters, inhibition of the mitochondrial death pathway or stimulation of pro-angiogenic factors. We herein summarize the mechanisms underlying nicotine's influence on biology of lung cancer cells and the effectiveness of anti-cancer therapy.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/metabolism , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm/physiology , Lung Neoplasms/metabolism , Nicotine/pharmacology , Smoking/adverse effects , Apoptosis/drug effects , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/physiopathology , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/radiotherapy , Cell Movement/drug effects , Cell Proliferation/drug effects , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Lung Neoplasms/physiopathology , Lung Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Neoplasm Invasiveness/physiopathology , Neoplastic Processes , Neovascularization, Pathologic/metabolism , Receptors, Nicotinic/metabolism , Signal Transduction/physiology
4.
Prz Menopauzalny ; 13(1): 70-2, 2014 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26327832

ABSTRACT

Tamoxifen is a selective estrogen receptor modulator used for the treatment of oestrogen/progesterone receptor positive breast cancer. It has antagonistic or agonistic activity depending on the tissue location. Generally it causes mild and reversible side effects, however more serious ones including cardiovascular and thromboembolic adverse events, uterine cancer or acute pancreatitis can also occur. Tamoxifen, like oestrogens, increases the plasma level of TG and liver secretion of VLDL. Moreover, it inhibits the key enzymes of triglyceride metabolism. In this report we present a case of a 55-year-old woman with a history of a poorly controlled hypertriglyceridaemia diagnosed with breast cancer. She was treated with surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy, radiotherapy and hormonotherapy with tamoxifen. About three months after hormonal treatment, her triglyceride level increased. Five months later she developed an acute necrotic pancreatitis that required hospitalization. Her serum samples on admission were highly lipemic. An abdominal ultrasound showed no evidence of gallstones or dilation of the bile ducts. There was no history of alcohol abuse or abdominal trauma. Tamoxifen was suspected as a trigger factor for pancreatitis. After the drug withdrawal and administration of the conservative management the patient's medical condition improved. Due to a postmenopausal status of the patient and no harmful effect on serum lipids, an adjuvant hormonotherapy with aromatase inhibitor was started.

5.
Peptides ; 38(2): 248-54, 2012 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23044212

ABSTRACT

Recent studies demonstrate that ghrelin can be an endogenous regulator of angiogenesis. We studied direct effects of human acylated (hAG) and unacylated (hUAG) ghrelin, as well as of rat acylated ghrelin (rAG) on the growth of HECa10 murine endothelial cells. Ghrelin was applied separately or together with D-Lys(3)-GHRP-6, which is commonly used as an antagonist of ghrelin receptor type 1a - GHS-R1a. The growth of HECa10 cells was assessed with Mosmann and in selected study conditions also with BrdU and TUNEL methods. Both hAG and hUAG (10(-5) M to 10(-12) M) inhibited the growth of HECa10 cells in 24h and 72 h cultures. Similarly, rAG decreased the growth of the cells after 24h (10(-7) M and 10(-11) M), and after 72 h (10(-7) M, 10(-8) M and 10(-11) M). Unexpectedly, D-Lys(3)-GHRP-6 itself also inhibited the growth of these cells at 10(-4) to 10(-6) M in 24h, 48 h (dose-response effect) and 72 h cultures. D-Lys(3)-GHRP-6 did not modify the inhibitory effect of rAG. However, D-Lys(3)-GHRP-6 at the concentration of 10(-4) M diminished, abolished or even reversed the inhibitory effect of hUAG in 72 h culture and this was dependent on ghrelin concentrations. These data indicate that both AG and UAG have antiangiogenic properties at least at the level of endothelial growth, through decreased metabolic activity of the cells or stimulation of apoptosis. D-Lys(3)-GHRP-6 (inhibitor of GHS-R1a) seems not to be an appropriate antagonist in this experimental condition. Similar effects of these substances on HECa10 cells suggest that they are not mediated by GHS-R1a.


Subject(s)
Endothelial Cells/drug effects , Ghrelin/antagonists & inhibitors , Ghrelin/chemistry , Oligopeptides/pharmacology , Receptors, Ghrelin/antagonists & inhibitors , Acylation , Animals , Cell Line , Cell Proliferation/drug effects , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Endothelial Cells/cytology , Ghrelin/pharmacology , Humans , Mice , Rats , Structure-Activity Relationship
6.
Arch Med Sci ; 7(1): 34-7, 2011 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22291730

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Interactions between vascular endothelium and blood platelets play a crucial role in cardiovascular diseases. Ex vitro models which use endothelial cells and platelets were the essential tools to investigate these interactions and their impact on haemostasis. The impaired interplay between vascular endothelium, blood platelets and leukocytes is believed to contribute to the development of cardiovascular disease. In this study we compared the ability of human (HUVECs) and murine (HECa10) endothelial cells to inhibit human platelet function and reactivity under in vitro conditions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The aliquots of platelet-rich plasma obtained from 20 healthy donors were incubated with murine endothelial cell line HECa10 or human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) (10 min, 37°C) prior to agonizing platelets with 5 µM ADP and monitoring platelet reactivity for 10 min using optical aggregation. RESULTS: Significant reduction in ADP-induced platelet aggregation in the presence of endothelial cell cultures remained independent of cell count. HUVECs appeared much more effective in the inhibition of platelet aggregation compared to HECa10 (35.2 ±2.3 AU vs. 43.7 ±2.0 AU, p= 0.025). CONCLUSIONS: HECa10 cells have much lower potential to inhibit platelet aggregation than HUVECs. This implies that these two cell lines may not be freely used interchangeably in in vitro experiments. These findings clearly indicate that the outcomes of in vitro studies performed with murine EC lines cannot be unreservedly extrapolated to human platelet-endothelium interactions.

7.
Endokrynol Pol ; 60(3): 166-71, 2009.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19569016

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Adiponectin, a peptide hormone secreted from the adipose tissue, has anti-diabetic, anti-atherogenic, and anti-inflammatory properties and is also involved in the regulation of angiogenesis. However, there are discrepancies among the results of the published data regarding its pro- or anti-angiogenic properties. The aim of our study was to examine the direct effect of various adiponectin concentrations applied separately or in combination with thalidomide on the growth of the murine endothelial cell line HECa 10 in 24- and 72-hour cell cultures. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We used immortalized murine endothelial cell line received from endothelial cells of the mouse peripheral lymph node. The effect of adiponectin was examined at concentrations from 10(-5) to 10(-12)M. Thalidomide was used at 10(-3)M concentration. The growth of HECa10 cells was assessed by the colorimetric Mosmann method. RESULTS: We found that adiponectin inhibited the growth of HECa 10 line at all examined concentrations in the 24-hour culture, with moderate potency. There were no dose- or time-response effects. In the 72-hour cell culture, adiponectin inhibited the growth with the same or weaker potency and we did not observe its inhibitory effect at 10(-12)M concentration. There was no beneficial interaction between adiponectin and thalidomide. In this study, however, thalidomide alone did not cause any inhibitory effect on this cell line. CONCLUSIONS: The obtained data show that adiponectin inhibits endothelial cell growth and may participate in angiogenesis regulation as an endogenous antiangiogenic factor.


Subject(s)
Adiponectin/metabolism , Adiponectin/pharmacology , Endothelial Cells/cytology , Neovascularization, Physiologic/physiology , Animals , Cell Line , Cell Proliferation/drug effects , Cells, Cultured , Mice , Thalidomide/administration & dosage
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...