Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Am J Emerg Med ; 45: 297-302, 2021 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33046311

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Mortality for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is high when traditional chest compressions are used without adjuncts. The abdominal aortic and junctional tourniquet (AAJT) is a device with a wedge-shaped air bladder that occludes the aortic bifurcation, augmenting blood flow to the heart and brain. Previously, the addition of AAJT during chest compression led to an increase in rate of survival in a model of traumatic cardiac arrest. HYPOTHESIS: This study was designed to determine if application of the AAJT would lead to more effective chest compressions as measured by improved hemodynamic parameters and an increased rate of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). METHODS: Yorkshire swine (n = 6 per group) underwent general anesthesia and instrumentation. Ventricular fibrillation (Vfib) was electrically induced and animals were allocated into groups with or without the AAJT. The AAJT was inflated if selected after four minutes of compressions. Following a total of ten minutes of compressions, the animals entered into a ten-minute advanced cardiac life support phase. Hemodynamics and blood gas measurements were compared between groups. RESULTS: ROSC or cardioversion from Vfib was not achieved in either group. The AAJT group had improved hemodynamic parameters with significantly higher carotid diastolic pressure and higher blood flow in the carotid artery (p = 0.016 and 0.028 respectively). However, no significant differences were observed with coronary perfusion pressure or end tidal CO2. CONCLUSION: The AAJT did not confer a survival advantage during chest compressions, but hemodynamic improvements were observed while the AAJT was in place.


Subject(s)
Aorta, Abdominal , Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation , Tourniquets , Ventricular Fibrillation , Animals , Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation/methods , Disease Models, Animal , Hemodynamic Monitoring , Prospective Studies , Swine , Ventricular Fibrillation/therapy
2.
Neurosurgery ; 79(6): 912-929, 2016 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27741219

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Conventional management for concussion involves prescribed rest and progressive return to activity. Recent evidence challenges this notion and suggests that active approaches may be effective for some patients. Previous concussion consensus statements provide limited guidance regarding active treatment. OBJECTIVE: To describe the current landscape of treatment for concussion and to provide summary agreements related to treatment to assist clinicians in the treatment of concussion. METHODS: On October 14 to 16, 2015, the Targeted Evaluation and Active Management (TEAM) Approaches to Treating Concussion meeting was convened in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Thirty-seven concussion experts from neuropsychology, neurology, neurosurgery, sports medicine, physical medicine and rehabilitation, physical therapy, athletic training, and research and 12 individuals representing sport, military, and public health organizations attended the meeting. The 37 experts indicated their agreement on a series of statements using an audience response system clicker device. RESULTS: A total of 16 statements of agreement were supported covering (1) Summary of the Current Approach to Treating Concussion, (2) Heterogeneity and Evolving Clinical Profiles of Concussion, (3) TEAM Approach to Concussion Treatment: Specific Strategies, and (4) Future Directions: A Call to Research. Support (ie, response of agree or somewhat agree) for the statements ranged from to 97% to 100%. CONCLUSION: Concussions are characterized by diverse symptoms and impairments and evolving clinical profiles; recovery varies on the basis of modifying factors, injury severity, and treatments. Active and targeted treatments may enhance recovery after concussion. Research is needed on concussion clinical profiles, biomarkers, and the effectiveness and timing of treatments. ABBREVIATIONS: ARS, audience response systemCDC, Centers for Disease Control and PreventionDoD, Department of DefensemTBI, mild traumatic brain injuryNCAA, National Collegiate Athletic AssociationNFL, National Football LeagueNIH, National Institutes of HealthRCT, randomized controlled trialRTP, return to playSRC, sport- and recreation-related concussionTBI, traumatic brain injuryTEAM, Targeted Evaluation and Active Management.


Subject(s)
Athletic Injuries/diagnosis , Athletic Injuries/therapy , Brain Concussion/diagnosis , Brain Concussion/therapy , Athletic Injuries/etiology , Attitude of Health Personnel , Brain Concussion/etiology , Clinical Protocols , Humans , Neuropsychological Tests , Physical Therapy Modalities , Rest , Sports Medicine
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...