Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Int J Clin Pract ; 75(10): e14340, 2021 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33966326

ABSTRACT

The novel coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) illness and deaths, caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2, continue to increase. Multiple reports highlight the thromboembolic complications, such as pulmonary embolism (PE), in COVID-19. Imaging plays an essential role in the diagnosis and management of COVID-19 patients with PE. There continues to be a rapid evolution of knowledge related to COVID-19 associated PE. This review summarises the current understanding of prevalence, pathophysiology, role of diagnostic imaging modalities, and management, including catheter-directed therapy for COVID-19 associated PE. It also describes infection control considerations for the radiology department while providing care for patients with COVID-19 associated PE.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pulmonary Embolism , Diagnostic Imaging , Humans , Pulmonary Embolism/diagnostic imaging , SARS-CoV-2
2.
AJR Am J Roentgenol ; 217(3): 623-632, 2021 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33112201

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND. Chest radiographs (CXRs) are typically obtained early in patients admitted with coronavirus disease (COVID-19) and may help guide prognosis and initial management decisions. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to assess the performance of an admission CXR severity scoring system in predicting hospital outcomes in patients admitted with COVID-19. METHODS. This retrospective study included 240 patients (142 men, 98 women; median age, 65 [range, 50-80] years) admitted to the hospital from March 16 to April 13, 2020, with COVID-19 confirmed by real-time reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction who underwent chest radiography within 24 hours of admission. Three attending chest radiologists and three radiology residents independently scored patients' admission CXRs using a 0- to 24-point composite scale (sum of scores that range from 0 to 3 for extent and severity of disease in upper and lower zones of left and right lungs). Interrater reliability of the score was assessed using the Kendall W coefficient. The mean score was obtained from the six readers' scores for further analyses. Demographic variables, clinical characteristics, and admission laboratory values were collected from electronic medical records. ROC analysis was performed to assess the association between CXR severity and mortality. Additional univariable and multivariable logistic regression models incorporating patient characteristics and laboratory values were tested for associations between CXR severity and clinical outcomes. RESULTS. Interrater reliability of CXR scores ranged from 0.687 to 0.737 for attending radiologists, from 0.653 to 0.762 for residents, and from 0.575 to 0.666 for all readers. A composite CXR score of 10 or higher on admission achieved 53.0% (35/66) sensitivity and 75.3% (131/174) specificity for predicting hospital mortality. Hospital mortality occurred in 44.9% (35/78) of patients with a high-risk admission CXR score (≥ 10) versus 19.1% (31/162) of patients with a low-risk CXR score (< 10) (p < .001). Admission composite CXR score was an independent predictor of death (odds ratio [OR], 1.17; 95% CI, 1.10-1.24; p < .001). composite CXR score was a univariable predictor of intubation (OR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.12-1.34; p < .001) and continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) (OR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.04-1.27; p = .007) but was not associated with these in multivariable models (p > .05). CONCLUSION. For patients admitted with COVID-19, an admission CXR severity score may help predict hospital mortality, intubation, and CRRT. CLINICAL IMPACT. CXR may assist risk assessment and clinical decision-making early in the course of COVID-19.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/diagnostic imaging , Lung/diagnostic imaging , Radiography, Thoracic , Severity of Illness Index , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , COVID-19/classification , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing , Female , Hospital Mortality , Hospitalization , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Reproducibility of Results , Retrospective Studies
3.
AJR Am J Roentgenol ; 217(2): 460-468, 2021 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32876476

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND. Ultrasound guidance allows performance of carpal tunnel release with smaller incisions and quicker recovery than traditional open or endoscopic surgery. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term effectiveness of ultrasound-guided carpal tunnel release in improving function and discomfort in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. METHODS. Retrospective review was conducted of 61 ultrasound-guided carpal tunnel release procedures performed on 46 patients (15 bilateral procedures) with clinically diagnosed carpal tunnel syndrome. The procedures were performed with a single-use transection device and local anesthesia at an outpatient radiology office. Patients answered three questionnaires (Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand [QDASH] and two parts of the Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire-the symptom severity [BCTSQ-SS] and functional status [BCTSQ-FS] scales) to assess the function of and discomfort in the affected wrist immediately before and 2 weeks and at least 1 year after the procedure. Higher scores indicated increasing disability. Patients also answered a global satisfaction question at follow-up. Preprocedure and postprocedure scores were compared by paired Wilcoxon signed rank tests. RESULTS. The 46 patients (25 women, 21 men; mean age, 60.6 years; range, 21-80 years) had median preprocedure scores of 45.4 for QDASH, 3.2 for BCTSQ-SS, and 2.5 for BCTSQ-FS. The median scores 2 weeks after the procedure were 22.5 for QDASH, 1.7 for BCTSQ-SS, and 1.9 for BCTSQ-FS. All scores decreased (p < .001) from preprocedure scores and surpassed reference standards for clinically important difference in scores. Follow-up questionnaires obtained for 90% (55/61) of wrists a median of 1.7 years (range, 1.0-2.8 years) after the procedure showed further declines (p < .001) in median scores: 2.3 for QDASH, 1.2 for BCTSQ-SS, and 1.1 for BCTSQ-FS. At long-term follow-up evaluation, 96% (52/54) of wrists had lower QDASH and 98% (53/54) had lower BCTSQ (average of BCTSQ-SS and BCTSQ-FS) scores compared with the preprocedure scores. Among the patients who participated in the survey, 93% (37/40) were satisfied or very satisfied with the long-term outcomes. No immediately postoperative complications occurred. Two patients needed surgical intervention 8 and 10 days after surgery, one for infection after injury and one for posttraumatic compartment syndrome. CONCLUSION. Ultrasound-guided carpal tunnel release quickly improves hand function and reduces hand discomfort; improvement persists beyond 1 year. CLINICAL IMPACT. Ultrasound-guided carpal tunnel release may be a safe, effective, and less invasive alternative to traditional surgery.


Subject(s)
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome/surgery , Ligaments/diagnostic imaging , Ligaments/surgery , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/methods , Ultrasonography, Interventional/methods , Wrist/surgery , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Surveys and Questionnaires , Treatment Outcome , Wrist/diagnostic imaging , Young Adult
4.
Am J Med Sci ; 360(1): 5-34, 2020 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32620220

ABSTRACT

Since December 2019, the global pandemic caused by the highly infectious novel coronavirus 2019-nCoV (COVID-19) has been rapidly spreading. As of April 2020, the outbreak has spread to over 210 countries, with over 2,400,000 confirmed cases and over 170,000 deaths.1 COVID-19 causes a severe pneumonia characterized by fever, cough and shortness of breath. Similar coronavirus outbreaks have occurred in the past causing severe pneumonia like COVID-19, most recently, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) and middle east respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV). However, over time, SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV were shown to cause extrapulmonary signs and symptoms including hepatitis, acute renal failure, encephalitis, myositis and gastroenteritis. Similarly, sporadic reports of COVID-19 related extrapulmonary manifestations emerge. Unfortunately, there is no comprehensive summary of the multiorgan manifestations of COVID-19, making it difficult for clinicians to quickly educate themselves about this highly contagious and deadly pathogen. What is more, is that SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV are the closest humanity has come to combating something similar to COVID-19, however, there exists no comparison between the manifestations of any of these novel coronaviruses. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge of the manifestations of the novel coronaviruses SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV and COVID-19, with a particular focus on the latter, and highlight their differences and similarities.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/physiopathology , Pneumonia, Viral/physiopathology , Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome/physiopathology , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Humans , Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus , SARS-CoV-2 , Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome/epidemiology
5.
Skeletal Radiol ; 49(3): 491-501, 2020 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31707422

ABSTRACT

Talus partitus is a rare skeletal developmental abnormality characterized by a split of the posterior talar bone in the coronal plane. Patients with talus partitus typically present with posterior ankle pain and instability, often displaying varying degrees of chondrosis and secondary degenerative change on imaging. To date, only few case reports describing the imaging appearance of talus partitus have been published. The majority of these publications are limited to radiographic and computed tomography (CT) imaging findings, despite the ubiquity of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). To the authors' knowledge, there is little description of typical MRI findings of the symptomatic talus partitus in the radiologic literature. We present a series of five cases of talus partitus identified on MRI and examine pitfalls in diagnosis, differential considerations, pathophysiology, and treatment options.


Subject(s)
Arthralgia/diagnostic imaging , Joint Instability/diagnostic imaging , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Talus/diagnostic imaging , Talus/immunology , Adolescent , Adult , Humans , Male , Middle Aged
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...