ABSTRACT
The objective of this study was to clarify the role of bisphosphonates in the treatment of osteoporosis in patients with prostate adenocarcinoma under androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). The Medline, EMBASE, Cancerlit and the American Society of Clinical Oncology abstract databases were searched for published randomized, placebo-controlled trials evaluating the usage of bisphosphonates in patients with prostate cancer (PC) under ADT. The outcomes assessed were fracture, osteoporosis, incidence of adverse events and changes in bone mineral density (BMD) during treatment. A total of 15 articles (2634 participants) were included in the meta-analysis. Treatment with bisphosphonates showed a substantial effect in preventing fractures (risk ratio (RR), 0.80; P = 0.005) and osteoporosis (RR, 0.39; P <0.00001). Zoledronic acid showed the best number needed to treat (NTT), compared with placebo, in relation to fractures and osteoporosis (NNT = 14.9 and NNT = 2.68, respectively). The between-group difference (bisphosphonates vs placebo) in the lumbar spine and femoral neck BMD were 5.18 ± 3.38% and 2.35 ± 1.16%, respectively. This benefit of bone loss prevention could be reached without major side effects (cardiovascular or gastrointestinal events). Bisphosphonates are effective in preventing bone loss in patients with PC who are under ADT.
Subject(s)
Androgens/metabolism , Bone Density Conservation Agents/therapeutic use , Diphosphonates/therapeutic use , Osteoporosis/prevention & control , Prostatic Neoplasms/therapy , Aged , Bone Density/drug effects , Bone Density Conservation Agents/adverse effects , Diphosphonates/adverse effects , Humans , Male , Osteoporosis/etiology , Prostatic Neoplasms/complications , Prostatic Neoplasms/metabolism , Randomized Controlled Trials as TopicABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Although the use of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) has resulted in improved survival in men with advanced prostate cancer, the resulting hypogonadism is associated with profound adverse effects comparable to those found in morbid obesity, being cardiovascular risk among the most lethal. OBJECTIVES: Evaluate metabolic syndrome, metabolic abnormalities and cardiovascular risk in patients with prostate cancer under ADT, not under ADT and morbid obese men. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study that involves 79 men presenting prostate cancer, of whom 54 under ADT and 25 not under ADT and 91 morbidly obese patients paired by sex and age. To define metabolic syndrome, we used the International Diabetes Federation (IDF) criteria. Metabolic abnormalities, metabolic markers and Framingham score to predict the ten year coronary heart disease risk were compared among patients under ADT, not under ADT and morbid obese. RESULTS: Patients under ADT presented significantly greater occurrence of diabetes and central obesity and higher levels of total cholesterol and low density lipoprotein (LDL) compared to eugonadal men. The mean cardiovascular risk was significantly higher in patients under ADT (39.97±12.53% vs. 26.09±14.80%; p=0.021). Morbidly obese subjects had increased ten year coronary heart disease risk; comparable to patients under ADT (p=0.054). CONCLUSION: This study suggests that patients under ADT show higher prevalence of metabolic abnormalities and cardiovascular risk similar to those found in morbidly obese subjects. It is possible that both processes share cardiovascular risk through metabolic syndrome.
Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/therapy , Androgens , Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal/adverse effects , Cardiovascular Diseases/etiology , Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone/agonists , Metabolic Syndrome/complications , Neoplasms, Hormone-Dependent/therapy , Obesity, Morbid/complications , Orchiectomy/adverse effects , Prostatic Neoplasms/therapy , Adenocarcinoma/drug therapy , Adenocarcinoma/surgery , Aged , Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal/therapeutic use , Biomarkers , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Combined Modality Therapy , Humans , Incidence , Male , Metabolic Syndrome/blood , Metabolic Syndrome/chemically induced , Metabolic Syndrome/physiopathology , Middle Aged , Neoplasms, Hormone-Dependent/surgery , Obesity, Morbid/physiopathology , Prostatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Prostatic Neoplasms/surgery , RiskABSTRACT
Brazilian patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia were randomised in a 12-week, double-blind, double-dummy study to receive doxazosin gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS) 4 mg q.i.d. (n = 82) or tamsulosin 0.4 q.i.d. (n = 83). Primary endpoints were the absolute and percentage change from baseline in symptoms measured by International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS). Secondary endpoints included IPSS, quality-of-life (QOL) question from the IPSS, and questions 6 and 7 of the Sexual Function Abbreviated Questionnaire (SFAQ) at weeks 4 and 12. Doxazosin GITS and tamsulosin improved IPSS with no significant differences between groups at week 12. During weeks 4-8, tamsulosin-treated patients demonstrated a slower improvement (p < 0.001) in IPSS than doxazosin GITS-treated patients. The proportion of satisfied patients was observed earlier with doxazosin GITS (p = 0.006) vs. tamsulosin. At week 12, the proportion of patients with little or no difficulty at ejaculation (Q6 of SFAQ) was higher in the doxazosin GITS group (p = 0.019). Both treatments were well tolerated.
