ABSTRACT
Although midcarpal fusion is a well-accepted treatment of advanced carpal collapse, 1 question remains unanswered: is this technically demanding procedure worthwhile in wrists with an already highly restricted flexion-extension arc (FEA) of less than 60 degrees preoperatively? Therefore, a retrospective analysis of the records of 142 consecutive patients who had had a midcarpal fusion of the wrist was performed. There were 50 patients in group 1 (FEA < 60 degrees) and 92 patients in group 2 (FEA ≥ 60 degrees) with a mean follow-up of 23 months. Flexion-extension arc preoperatively and postoperatively, pain evaluated by a visual analog scale from 0 to 10 as well as the patients' upper extremity functioning captured with the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire were statistically analyzed. Functional range of motion was defined as 5-degree wrist flexion and 30-degree wrist extension. Median wrist flexion before versus after midcarpal fusion was 18 versus 22 degrees and 23 versus 25 degrees for wrist extension in group 1. In group 2, the data were 42 versus 27 degrees and 43 versus 30 degrees, respectively. Midcarpal fusion led to an improvement of FEA in 52% of patients in group 1 but only in 5.4% of patients in group 2. In group 1, the median FEA improved by 122%, whereas the median FEA declined to 69% in group 2. Preoperatively 20% of patients in group 1 and 95% of patients in group 2 reached a functional range of motion for flexion/extension, which changed to 36% in group 1 versus 62% in group 2 postoperatively. The visual analog scale score improved for group 1 from 5.7 to 2.4 and for group 2 from 5.7 to 3.2, respectively. The postoperative DASH score was for both groups 33 points. Our data demonstrate that even in patients with a highly restricted range of motion in advanced carpal collapse, it is still reasonable to perform a midcarpal fusion instead of total wrist fusion.
