"Neural dynamics supporting longitudinal plasticity of action naming across languages: MEG evidence from bilingual brain tumor patients".

Previous evidence suggests that distinct ventral and dorsal streams respectively underpin the semantic processing of object and action knowledge. Recently, we found that brain tumor patients with dorsal gliomas in frontoparietal hubs show a selective longitudinal compensation (post-vs. pre-surgery) during the retrieval of lexico-semantic information about actions (but not objects), indexed by power increases in beta rhythms (13-28 Hz). Here, we move one-step further and ask whether a similar organizational principle also stands across the different languages a bilingual speaks. To test this hypothesis, we combined a picture-naming task with MEG recordings and evaluated highly proficient Spanish-Basque bilinguals undergoing surgery for tumor resection in left frontoparietal regions. We assessed patients before and three months after surgery. At the behavioral level, we observed a similar performance across sessions irrespectively of the language at use, suggesting overall successful function preservation. At the oscillatory level, we found longitudinal selective power increases in beta for action naming in Spanish and Basque. Nevertheless, tumor resection triggered a differential reorganization of the L1 and the L2, with the latter one additionally recruiting the right hemisphere. Overall, our results provide evidence for (i) the specific involvement of frontoparietal regions in the semantic retrieval/representation of action knowledge across languages; (ii) a key role of beta oscillations as a signature of language compensation and (iii) the existence of divergent plasticity trajectories in L1 and L2 after surgery. By doing so, they provide new insights into the spectro-temporal dynamics supporting postoperative recovery in the bilingual brain.

What Can Glioma Patients Teach Us about Language (Re)Organization in the Bilingual Brain: Evidence from fMRI and MEG.

Recent evidence suggests that the presence of brain tumors (e.g., low-grade gliomas) triggers language reorganization. Neuroplasticity mechanisms called into play can transfer linguistic functions from damaged to healthy areas unaffected by the tumor. This phenomenon has been reported in monolingual patients, but much less is known about the neuroplasticity of language in the bilingual brain. A central question is whether processing a first or second language involves the same or different cortical territories and whether damage results in diverse recovery patterns depending on the language involved. This question becomes critical for preserving language areas in bilingual brain-tumor patients to prevent involuntary pathological symptoms following resection. While most studies have focused on intraoperative mapping, here, we go further, reporting clinical cases for five bilingual patients tested before and after tumor resection, using a novel multimethod approach merging neuroimaging information from fMRI and MEG to map the longitudinal reshaping of the language system. Here, we present four main findings. First, all patients preserved linguistic function in both languages after surgery, suggesting that the surgical intervention with intraoperative language mapping was successful in preserving cortical and subcortical structures necessary for brain plasticity at the functional level. Second, we found reorganization of the language network after tumor resection in both languages, mainly reflected by a shift of activity to right hemisphere nodes and the recruitment of ipsilesional left nodes. Third, we found that this reorganization varied according to the language involved, indicating that L1 and L2 follow different reshaping patterns after surgery. Fourth, oscillatory longitudinal effects were correlated with BOLD laterality changes in superior parietal and middle frontal areas. These findings may reflect that neuroplasticity impacts on the compensatory involvement of executive control regions, supporting the allocation of cognitive resources as a consequence of increased attentional demands. Furthermore, these results hint at the complementary role of this neuroimaging approach in language mapping, with fMRI offering excellent spatial localization and MEG providing optimal spectrotemporal resolution.