Etiology and antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of anaerobic bacteria isolated from clinical samples in a university hospital in Madrid, Spain.

BACKGROUND: The anaerobic infection management is usually based on empirical treatment because anaerobic culture techniques take a long time due to their fastidious nature. The aim of this study was to analyze the etiological profile of severe anaerobic infections and AST data from clinical anaerobic bacteria isolated in a tertiary hospital in Madrid (Spain). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A consecutive study was carried out over 19 months in Ramón y Cajal Universitary Hospital, Madrid. Clinical samples were processed in appropriate anaerobic media and incubated using Anoxomat system. Identification was performed by MALDI-TOF. AST were determined with gradient diffusion method using EUCAST (penicillin, co-amoxiclav, imipenem, clindamycine and metronidazole) or CLSI (cefoxitin) breakpoints. RESULTS: During the period of study, 503 anaerobic microorganisms isolated from 424 clinical samples were included. Twenty-six percent of the cultures were monomicrobial, while 70.0% also contained aerobic bacteria. The most common source of infection was abscesses (26%), while blood infections represented the 11%. Anaerobic gram-negative bacilli were predominant (41%), being Bacteroides fragilis (13%) the most prevalent overall; anaerobic gram-positive bacilli represented 35%, anaerobic gram-positive cocci 19% and anaerobic gram-negative cocci 5%. Metronidazole and imipenem were the most effective agents tested against anaerobic bacteria, while clindamycin presented higher resistance rates. CONCLUSION: Antimicrobial susceptibility surveillance of anaerobic bacteria should be performed to monitor changes in resistance patterns and to be able to optimize empiric antimicrobial treatment. Reliable species identification and quick reporting of results would guide clinicians to select the optimal antimicrobial therapy.

Comparison of different methods for identification of species of the genus Raoultella: report of 11 cases of Raoultella causing bacteraemia and literature review.

The genus Raoultella was excised from Klebsiella in 2001, but difficulties in its identification may have led to an underestimation of its incidence and uncertainty on its pathogenic role. Recently, clinical reports involving Raoultella have increased, probably through the introduction of mass-spectrometry in clinical microbiology laboratories and the development of accurate molecular techniques. We performed a retrospective analysis using our blood culture collection (2011-14) to identify Raoultella isolates that could have been erroneously reported as Klebsiella. PCR and gene sequencing of highly specific chromosomal class A ß-lactamase genes was established as the reference method, and compared with 16S rRNA and rpoß sequencing, as well as matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectroscopy (MALDI-TOF MS), MicroScan Walkaway system and API20E biochemical identification. MALDI-TOF and rpoß correctly identified all Raoultella isolates, whereas 16S rRNA provided inconclusive results, and MicroScan and API20E failed to detect this genus. The analysis of the clinical characteristics of all Raoultella bacteraemia cases reported in the literature supports the role of Raoultella as an opportunistic pathogen that causes biliary tract infections in elderly patients who suffer from some kind of malignancy or have undergone an invasive procedure. Two salient conclusions are that Raoultella shows tropism for the biliary tract and so its identification could help clinicians to suspect underlying biliary tract disease when bacteraemia occurs. Concomitantly, as most phenotypic identification systems are not optimized for the identification of Raoultella, the use of MALDI-TOF or additional phenotypic tests is recommended for the reliable identification of this genus.