Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 9 de 9
Filter
1.
Diabetes Technol Ther ; 20(4): 296-302, 2018 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29470128

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Subcutaneous (s.c.) glucose sensors have become a key component in type 1 diabetes management. However, their usability is limited by the impact of foreign body response (FBR) on their duration, reliability, and accuracy. Our study gives the first description of human acute and subacute s.c. response to glucose sensors, showing the changes observed in the sensor surface, the inflammatory cells involved in the FBR and their relationship with sensor performance. METHODS: Twelve obese patients (seven type 2 diabetes) underwent two abdominal biopsies comprising the surrounding area where they had worn two glucose sensors: the first one inserted 7 days before and the second one 24 h before biopsy procedure. Samples were processed and studied to describe tissue changes by two independent pathologists (blind regarding sensor duration). Macrophages quantification was studied by immunohistochemistry methods in the area surrounding the sensor (CD68, CD163). Sensor surface changes were studied by scanning electron microscopy. Seven-day continuous glucose monitoring records were considered inaccurate when mean absolute relative difference was higher than 10%. RESULTS: Pathologists were able to correctly classify all the biopsies regarding sensor duration. Acute response (24 h) was characterized by the presence of neutrophils while macrophages were the main cell involved in subacute inflammation. The number of macrophages around the insertion hole was higher for less accurate sensors compared with those performing more accurately (32.6 ± 14 vs. 10.6 ± 1 cells/0.01 mm2; P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The accumulation of macrophages at the sensor-tissue interface is related with decrease in accuracy of the glucose measure.


Subject(s)
Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring/instrumentation , Blood Glucose/metabolism , Foreign-Body Reaction/metabolism , Macrophages/metabolism , Subcutaneous Tissue/metabolism , Adult , Biosensing Techniques , Female , Foreign-Body Reaction/etiology , Humans , Inflammation/etiology , Inflammation/metabolism , Insulin Infusion Systems/adverse effects , Male , Middle Aged , Obesity/metabolism
2.
J Diabetes Sci Technol ; 12(2): 260-264, 2018 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28420257

ABSTRACT

Gestational diabetes (GDM) burden has been increasing progressively over the past years. Knowing that intrauterine exposure to maternal diabetes confers high risk for macrosomia as well as for future type 2 diabetes and obesity of the offspring, health care organizations try to provide effective control in spite of the limited resources. Artificial-intelligence-augmented telemedicine has been proposed as a helpful tool to facilitate an efficient widespread medical assistance to GDM. The aim of the study we present was to test the feasibility and acceptance of a mobile decision-support system for GDM, developed in the seventh framework program MobiGuide Project, which includes computer-interpretable clinical practice guidelines, access to data from the electronic health record as well as from glucose, blood pressure, and activity sensors. The results of this pilot study with 20 patients showed that the system is feasible. Compliance of patients with blood glucose monitoring was higher than that observed in a historical group of 247 patients, similar in clinical characteristics, who had been followed up for the 3 years prior to the pilot study. A questionnaire on the use of the telemedicine system showed a high degree of acceptance.


Subject(s)
Decision Support Systems, Clinical , Diabetes, Gestational , Smartphone , Software , Telemedicine , Adult , Blood Glucose/analysis , Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring/methods , Blood Pressure , Exercise , Feasibility Studies , Female , Humans , Ketosis , Patient Compliance , Patient Satisfaction , Pilot Projects , Pregnancy
3.
J Diabetes Sci Technol ; 12(2): 303-310, 2018 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28539087

ABSTRACT

In the past decade diabetes management has been transformed by the addition of continuous glucose monitoring and insulin pump data. More recently, a wide variety of functions and physiologic variables, such as heart rate, hours of sleep, number of steps walked and movement, have been available through wristbands or watches. New data, hydration, geolocation, and barometric pressure, among others, will be incorporated in the future. All these parameters, when analyzed, can be helpful for patients and doctors' decision support. Similar new scenarios have appeared in most medical fields, in such a way that in recent years, there has been an increased interest in the development and application of the methods of artificial intelligence (AI) to decision support and knowledge acquisition. Multidisciplinary research teams integrated by computer engineers and doctors are more and more frequent, mirroring the need of cooperation in this new topic. AI, as a science, can be defined as the ability to make computers do things that would require intelligence if done by humans. Increasingly, diabetes-related journals have been incorporating publications focused on AI tools applied to diabetes. In summary, diabetes management scenarios have suffered a deep transformation that forces diabetologists to incorporate skills from new areas. This recently needed knowledge includes AI tools, which have become part of the diabetes health care. The aim of this article is to explain in an easy and plane way the most used AI methodologies to promote the implication of health care providers-doctors and nurses-in this field.


Subject(s)
Artificial Intelligence , Decision Support Systems, Clinical , Diabetes Mellitus , Machine Learning , Humans
4.
Int J Med Inform ; 102: 35-49, 2017 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28495347

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The growth of diabetes prevalence is causing an increasing demand in health care services which affects the clinicians' workload as medical resources do not grow at the same rate as the diabetic population. Decision support tools can help clinicians with the inspection of monitoring data, providing a preliminary analysis to ease their interpretation and reduce the evaluation time per patient. This paper presents Sinedie, a clinical decision support system designed to manage the treatment of patients with gestational diabetes. Sinedie aims to improve access to specialized healthcare assistance, to prevent patients from unnecessary displacements, to reduce the evaluation time per patient and to avoid gestational diabetes adverse outcomes. METHODS: A web-based telemedicine platform was designed to remotely evaluate patients allowing them to upload their glycaemia data at home directly from their glucose meter, as well as report other monitoring variables like ketonuria and compliance to dietary treatment. Glycaemia values, not tagged by patients, are automatically labelled with their associated meal by a classifier based on the Expectation Maximization clustering algorithm and a C4.5 decision tree learning algorithm. Two finite automata are combined to determine the patient's metabolic condition, which is analysed by a rule-based knowledge base to generate therapy adjustment recommendations. Diet recommendations are automatically prescribed and notified to the patients, whereas recommendations about insulin requirements are notified also to the physicians, who will decide if insulin needs to be prescribed. The system provides clinicians with a view where patients are prioritized according to their metabolic condition. A randomized controlled clinical trial was designed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Sinedie interventions versus standard care and its impact in the professionals' workload in terms of the clinician's time required per patient; number of face-to-face visits; frequency and duration of telematics reviews; patients' compliance to self-monitoring; and patients' satisfaction. RESULTS: Sinedie was clinically evaluated at "Parc Tauli University Hospital" in Spain during 17 months with the participation of 90 patients with gestational diabetes. Sinedie detected all situations that required a therapy adjustment and all the generated recommendations were safe. The time devoted by clinicians to patients' evaluation was reduced by 27.389% and face-to-face visits per patient were reduced by 88.556%. Patients reported to be highly satisfied with the system, considering it useful and trusting in being well controlled. There was no monitoring loss and, in average, patients measured their glycaemia 3.890 times per day and sent their monitoring data every 3.477days. CONCLUSIONS: Sinedie generates safe advice about therapy adjustments, reduces the clinicians' workload and helps physicians to identify which patients need a more urgent or more exhaustive examination and those who present good metabolic control. Additionally, Sinedie saves patients unnecessary displacements which contributes to medical centres' waiting list reduction.


Subject(s)
Decision Support Systems, Clinical/statistics & numerical data , Diabetes, Gestational/diet therapy , Diabetes, Gestational/drug therapy , Diet , Hypoglycemic Agents/administration & dosage , Insulin/administration & dosage , Internet/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Patient Satisfaction , Pregnancy , Spain , Telemedicine
5.
Int J Med Inform ; 101: 108-130, 2017 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28347441

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The MobiGuide project aimed to establish a ubiquitous, user-friendly, patient-centered mobile decision-support system for patients and for their care providers, based on the continuous application of clinical guidelines and on semantically integrated electronic health records. Patients would be empowered by the system, which would enable them to lead their normal daily lives in their regular environment, while feeling safe, because their health state would be continuously monitored using mobile sensors and self-reporting of symptoms. When conditions occur that require medical attention, patients would be notified as to what they need to do, based on evidence-based guidelines, while their medical team would be informed appropriately, in parallel. We wanted to assess the system's feasibility and potential effects on patients and care providers in two different clinical domains. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We describe MobiGuide's architecture, which embodies these objectives. Our novel methodologies include a ubiquitous architecture, encompassing a knowledge elicitation process for parallel coordinated workflows for patients and care providers; the customization of computer-interpretable guidelines (CIGs) by secondary contexts affecting remote management and distributed decision-making; a mechanism for episodic, on demand projection of the relevant portions of CIGs from a centralized, backend decision-support system (DSS), to a local, mobile DSS, which continuously delivers the actual recommendations to the patient; shared decision-making that embodies patient preferences; semantic data integration; and patient and care provider notification services. MobiGuide has been implemented and assessed in a preliminary fashion in two domains: atrial fibrillation (AF), and gestational diabetes Mellitus (GDM). Ten AF patients used the AF MobiGuide system in Italy and 19 GDM patients used the GDM MobiGuide system in Spain. The evaluation of the MobiGuide system focused on patient and care providers' compliance to CIG recommendations and their satisfaction and quality of life. RESULTS: Our evaluation has demonstrated the system's capability for supporting distributed decision-making and its use by patients and clinicians. The results show that compliance of GDM patients to the most important monitoring targets - blood glucose levels (performance of four measurements a day: 0.87±0.11; measurement according to the recommended frequency of every day or twice a week: 0.99±0.03), ketonuria (0.98±0.03), and blood pressure (0.82±0.24) - was high in most GDM patients, while compliance of AF patients to the most important targets was quite high, considering the required ECG measurements (0.65±0.28) and blood-pressure measurements (0.75±1.33). This outcome was viewed by the clinicians as a major potential benefit of the system, and the patients have demonstrated that they are capable of self-monitoring - something that they had not experienced before. In addition, the system caused the clinicians managing the AF patients to change their diagnosis and subsequent treatment for two of the ten AF patients, and caused the clinicians managing the GDM patients to start insulin therapy earlier in two of the 19 patients, based on system's recommendations. Based on the end-of-study questionnaires, the sense of safety that the system has provided to the patients was its greatest asset. Analysis of the patients' quality of life (QoL) questionnaires for the AF patients was inconclusive, because while most patients reported an improvement in their quality of life in the EuroQoL questionnaire, most AF patients reported a deterioration in the AFEQT questionnaire. DISCUSSION: Feasibility and some of the potential benefits of an evidence-based distributed patient-guidance system were demonstrated in both clinical domains. The potential application of MobiGuide to other medical domains is supported by its standards-based patient health record with multiple electronic medical record linking capabilities, generic data insertion methods, generic medical knowledge representation and application methods, and the ability to communicate with a wide range of sensors. Future larger scale evaluations can assess the impact of such a system on clinical outcomes. CONCLUSION: MobiGuide's feasibility was demonstrated by a working prototype for the AF and GDM domains, which is usable by patients and clinicians, achieving high compliance to self-measurement recommendations, while enhancing the satisfaction of patients and care providers.


Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation/therapy , Decision Support Systems, Clinical , Diabetes, Gestational/therapy , Practice Guidelines as Topic/standards , Adult , Computer Communication Networks , Decision Making , Electronic Health Records , Female , Guideline Adherence , Humans , Pregnancy , Quality of Life
6.
J Diabetes Sci Technol ; 8(2): 238-246, 2014 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24876573

ABSTRACT

The risks associated with gestational diabetes (GD) can be reduced with an active treatment able to improve glycemic control. Advances in mobile health can provide new patient-centric models for GD to create personalized health care services, increase patient independence and improve patients' self-management capabilities, and potentially improve their treatment compliance. In these models, decision-support functions play an essential role. The telemedicine system MobiGuide provides personalized medical decision support for GD patients that is based on computerized clinical guidelines and adapted to a mobile environment. The patient's access to the system is supported by a smartphone-based application that enhances the efficiency and ease of use of the system. We formalized the GD guideline into a computer-interpretable guideline (CIG). We identified several workflows that provide decision-support functionalities to patients and 4 types of personalized advice to be delivered through a mobile application at home, which is a preliminary step to providing decision-support tools in a telemedicine system: (1) therapy, to help patients to comply with medical prescriptions; (2) monitoring, to help patients to comply with monitoring instructions; (3) clinical assessment, to inform patients about their health conditions; and (4) upcoming events, to deal with patients' personal context or special events. The whole process to specify patient-oriented decision support functionalities ensures that it is based on the knowledge contained in the GD clinical guideline and thus follows evidence-based recommendations but at the same time is patient-oriented, which could enhance clinical outcomes and patients' acceptance of the whole system.

7.
Diabetes Technol Ther ; 16(3): 172-9, 2014 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24152323

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study assessed the efficacy of a closed-loop (CL) system consisting of a predictive rule-based algorithm (pRBA) on achieving nocturnal and postprandial normoglycemia in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). The algorithm is personalized for each patient's data using two different strategies to control nocturnal and postprandial periods. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We performed a randomized crossover clinical study in which 10 T1DM patients treated with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) spent two nonconsecutive nights in the research facility: one with their usual CSII pattern (open-loop [OL]) and one controlled by the pRBA (CL). The CL period lasted from 10 p.m. to 10 a.m., including overnight control, and control of breakfast. Venous samples for blood glucose (BG) measurement were collected every 20 min. RESULTS: Time spent in normoglycemia (BG, 3.9-8.0 mmol/L) during the nocturnal period (12 a.m.-8 a.m.), expressed as median (interquartile range), increased from 66.6% (8.3-75%) with OL to 95.8% (73-100%) using the CL algorithm (P<0.05). Median time in hypoglycemia (BG, <3.9 mmol/L) was reduced from 4.2% (0-21%) in the OL night to 0.0% (0.0-0.0%) in the CL night (P<0.05). Nine hypoglycemic events (<3.9 mmol/L) were recorded with OL compared with one using CL. The postprandial glycemic excursion was not lower when the CL system was used in comparison with conventional preprandial bolus: time in target (3.9-10.0 mmol/L) 58.3% (29.1-87.5%) versus 50.0% (50-100%). CONCLUSIONS: A highly precise personalized pRBA obtains nocturnal normoglycemia, without significant hypoglycemia, in T1DM patients. There appears to be no clear benefit of CL over prandial bolus on the postprandial glycemia.


Subject(s)
Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/drug therapy , Hypoglycemia/drug therapy , Hypoglycemic Agents/administration & dosage , Insulin Infusion Systems , Insulin/administration & dosage , Pancreas, Artificial , Algorithms , Blood Glucose/metabolism , Cross-Over Studies , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/blood , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/physiopathology , Female , Glycated Hemoglobin/metabolism , Humans , Hypoglycemia/metabolism , Hypoglycemia/physiopathology , Infusions, Subcutaneous , Male , Meals , Postprandial Period , Predictive Value of Tests , Reproducibility of Results , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
8.
J Diabetes Sci Technol ; 3(5): 1039-46, 2009 Sep 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20144417

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The use of telemedicine for diabetes care has evolved over time, proving that it contributes to patient self-monitoring, improves glycemic control, and provides analysis tools for decision support. The timely development of a safe and robust ambulatory artificial pancreas should rely on a telemedicine architecture complemented with automatic data analysis tools able to manage all the possible high-risk situations and to guarantee the patient's safety. METHODS: The Intelligent Control Assistant system (INCA) telemedical artificial pancreas architecture is based on a mobile personal assistant integrated into a telemedicine system. The INCA supports four control strategies and implements an automatic data processing system for risk management (ADP-RM) providing short-term and medium-term risk analyses. The system validation comprises data from 10 type 1 pump-treated diabetic patients who participated in two randomized crossover studies, and it also includes in silico simulation and retrospective data analysis. RESULTS: The ADP-RM short-term risk analysis prevents hypoglycemic events by interrupting insulin infusion. The pump interruption has been implemented in silico and tested for a closed-loop simulation over 30 hours. For medium-term risk management, analysis of capillary blood glucose notified the physician with a total of 62 alarms during a clinical experiment (56% for hyperglycemic events). The ADP-RM system is able to filter anomalous continuous glucose records and to detect abnormal administration of insulin doses with the pump. CONCLUSIONS: Automatic data analysis procedures have been tested as an essential tool to achieve a safe ambulatory telemedical artificial pancreas, showing their ability to manage short-term and medium-term risk situations.


Subject(s)
Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring/instrumentation , Blood Glucose/drug effects , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/therapy , Hypoglycemic Agents/administration & dosage , Insulin Infusion Systems , Insulin/administration & dosage , Pancreas, Artificial , Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted , Telemedicine/instrumentation , Ambulatory Care , Automation , Clinical Alarms , Cross-Over Studies , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/blood , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/diagnosis , Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted , Dietary Carbohydrates/administration & dosage , Dietary Carbohydrates/metabolism , Equipment Failure , Humans , Hypoglycemia/chemically induced , Hypoglycemia/prevention & control , Hypoglycemic Agents/adverse effects , Insulin/adverse effects , Predictive Value of Tests , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Retrospective Studies , Risk Management , Systems Integration , Therapy, Computer-Assisted , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
9.
Diabetes Technol Ther ; 10(3): 194-9, 2008 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18473693

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Real-time continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) has recently been incorporated into routine diabetes management because of the potential advantages it offers for glycemic control. The aim of our study was to evaluate the impact of the use of real-time CGM together with a telemedicine system in hemoglobin A1c and glucose variability in patients with type 1 diabetes treated with insulin pumps. METHODS: Ten patients (five women, 41.2 [range, 21-62] years old, duration of diabetes 14.9 [range, 3-52] years) were included in this randomized crossover study. Patients used the DIABTel telemedicine system throughout the study, and real-time CGM was used for 3 days every week during the intervention phase. At the end of the control phase, a blind 3-day CGM was performed. Glucose variability was evaluated using the Glucose Risk Index (GRI), a comparative analysis of continuous glucose values over two consecutive hours. RESULTS: Hemoglobin A1c decreased significantly (8.1 +/- 1.1% vs. 7.3 +/- 0.8%; P = 0.007) after the intervention phase, while no changes were observed during the control phase. The mean number of daily capillary glucose readings was higher during the intervention phase (4.7 +/- 1.1 vs. 3.8 +/- 1.0; P < 0.01), because of an increase in random analyses (1.22 +/- 0.3 vs. 0.58 +/- 0.1; P < 0.01), and there was also a significant increase in the mean number of bolus doses per day (5.23 +/- 1.1 vs. 4.4 +/- 0.8; P < 0.05). The GRI was higher during the control phase than during the experimental phase (9.6 vs. 6.25; P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Real-time CGM in conjunction with the DIABTel system improves glycemic control and glucose stability in pump-treated patients with type 1 diabetes.


Subject(s)
Blood Glucose/analysis , Blood Glucose/metabolism , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/blood , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/drug therapy , Insulin Infusion Systems , Blood Glucose/drug effects , Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring , Cross-Over Studies , Equipment Design , Homeostasis , Humans , Monitoring, Ambulatory/methods , Point-of-Care Systems , Telemedicine/methods
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...