Patient-specific quality assurance of dynamically-collimated proton therapy treatment plans.

BACKGROUND: The dynamic collimation system (DCS) provides energy layer-specific collimation for pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy using two pairs of orthogonal nickel trimmer blades. While excellent measurement-to-calculation agreement has been demonstrated for simple cube-shaped DCS-trimmed dose distributions, no comparison of measurement and dose calculation has been made for patient-specific treatment plans. PURPOSE: To validate a patient-specific quality assurance (PSQA) process for DCS-trimmed PBS treatment plans and evaluate the agreement between measured and calculated dose distributions. METHODS: Three intracranial patient cases were considered. Standard uncollimated PBS and DCS-collimated treatment plans were generated for each patient using the Astroid treatment planning system (TPS). Plans were recalculated in a water phantom and delivered at the Miami Cancer Institute (MCI) using an Ion Beam Applications (IBA) dedicated nozzle system and prototype DCS. Planar dose measurements were acquired at two depths within low-gradient regions of the target volume using an IBA MatriXX ion chamber array. RESULTS: Measured and calculated dose distributions were compared using 2D gamma analysis with 3%/3 mm criteria and low dose threshold of 10% of the maximum dose. Median gamma pass rates across all plans and measurement depths were 99.0% (PBS) and 98.3% (DCS), with a minimum gamma pass rate of 88.5% (PBS) and 91.2% (DCS). CONCLUSIONS: The PSQA process has been validated and experimentally verified for DCS-collimated PBS. Dosimetric agreement between the measured and calculated doses was demonstrated to be similar for DCS-collimated PBS to that achievable with noncollimated PBS.

Remdesivir plus dexamethasone is associated to improvement in the clinical outcome of COVID-19 hospitalized patients regardless of their vaccination status / Remdesivir más dexametasona se asocian a una reducción de los eventos clínicos en los pacientes hospitalizados por COVID-19, independientemente de su estado de vacunación

Introduction Remdesivir seems to reduce the risk of hospitalization and improve clinical outcome in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Objectives To compare the clinical outcome of COVID-19 hospitalized patients treated with remdesivir plus dexamethasone versus dexamethasone alone, according to their vaccination status. Material and methods A retrospective observational study was carried out in 165 patients hospitalized for COVID-19 from October 2021 to January 2022. Multivariate logistic regression, Kaplan–Meier and the log-rank tests were used to evaluate the event (need for ventilation or death). Results Patients treated with remdesivir plus dexamethasone (n=87) compared with dexamethasone alone (n=78) showed similar age (60±16, 47–70 vs. 62±37, 51–74 years) and number of comorbidities: 1 (0–2) versus 1.5 (1–3). Among 73 fully vaccinated patients, 42 (47.1%) were in remdesivir plus dexamethasone and 31 (41%) in dexamethasone alone. Patients treated with remdesivir plus dexamethasone needed intensive care less frequently (17.2% vs. 31%; p=0.002), high-flow oxygen (25.3% vs. 50.0%; p=0.002) and non-invasive mechanical ventilation (16.1% vs. 47.4%; p<0.001). Furthermore, they had less complications during hospitalization (31.0% vs. 52.6%; p=0.008), need of antibiotics (32.2% vs. 59%; p=0.001) and radiologic worsening (21.8% vs. 44.9%; p=0.005). Treatment with remdesivir plus dexamethasone (aHR, 0.26; 95% CI: 0.14–0.48; p<0.001) and vaccination (aHR 0.39; 95% CI: 0.21–0.74) were independent factors associated with lower progression to mechanical ventilation or death. Conclusions Remdesivir in combination with dexamethasone and vaccination independently and synergistically protects hospitalized COVID-19 patients requiring oxygen therapy from progression to severe disease or dead (AU)

Introducción Remdesivir parece reducir el riesgo de hospitalización y mejorar el resultado clínico en pacientes hospitalizados con COVID-19. Objetivos Comparar el desenlace clínico de pacientes hospitalizados con COVID-19 tratados con remdesivir más dexametasona vs. dexametasona sola, según su estado de vacunación. Material y métodos Se realizó un estudio observacional retrospectivo en 165 pacientes hospitalizados por COVID-19 desde octubre de 2021 hasta enero de 2022. Se consideró como evento la necesidad de ventilación o muerte. esultados Los pacientes tratados con remdesivir más dexametasona (n=87) en comparación con dexametasona sola (n=78) mostraron una edad similar (60±16, 47-70 vs. 62±37, 51-74 años) y número de comorbilidades: 1 (0-2) vs. 1,5 (1-3). Entre 73 pacientes completamente vacunados, 42 (47,1%) estaban en remdesivir más dexametasona y 31 (41%) en dexametasona sola. Los pacientes tratados con remdesivir más dexametasona necesitaron cuidados intensivos con menos frecuencia (17,2 vs. 31%; p=0,002), oxígeno de alto flujo (25,3 vs. 50%; p=0,002) y ventilación mecánica no invasiva (16,1 vs. 47,4%, p<0,001). Además, tuvieron menos complicaciones durante la hospitalización (31 vs. 52,6%; p=0,008), necesidad de antibióticos (32,2 vs. 59%; p=0,001) y empeoramiento radiológico (21,8 vs. 44,9%; p=0,005). El tratamiento con remdesivir más dexametasona (aHR, 0,26; IC 95% 0,14-0,48; p<0,001) y la vacunación (aHR 0,39; IC 95% 0,21-0,74>) fueron factores independientes asociados con una menor progresión a ventilación mecánica o muerte. Conclusiones Remdesivir en combinación con dexametasona protegieron de forma independiente y sinérgica a los pacientes hospitalizados con COVID-19 que requieren oxigenoterapia de la progresión a la enfermedad grave o la muerte (AU)

Role of vaccination and anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in the clinical outcome of hospitalized COVID-19 patients.

Background: Although vaccination has considerably reduced the risk of hospitalization and death from COVID19, the impact of vaccination and anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody status on the outcome of patients who required hospitalization has been poorly investigated. Material and methods: A prospective observational study in 232 patients hospitalized for COVID19 was carried out from October 2021 to January 2022 to evaluate the role on patient outcome of their vaccination and anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody status and titer, comorbidities, analytical determinations, clinical presentation at admission, treatments and requirements for respiratory support. Cox regression and survival analyzes were performed. The SPSS and "R" programs were used. Results: Patients with complete vaccination schedule had higher S-protein antibody titers (log10 3.73 [2.83-4.6] UI/ml vs 1.6 [2.99-2.61] UI/ml; p < 0.001), lower probability of radiographic worsening (21.6% vs. 35.4%; p = 0.005), less likely required high doses of dexamethasone (28.4% vs. 45.4%; p = 0.012), high-flow oxygen (20.6% vs. 35.4%; p = 0.02), ventilation (13.7% vs, 33.8%; p = 0.001) and intensive care admissions (10.8% vs. 32.6%; p < 0.001). Remdesivir (HR = 0.38; p < 0.001) and complete vaccination schedule (HR = 0.34; p = 0.008) were protective factors. No differences in antibody status were detected between groups (HR = 0.58; p = 0.219). Conclusions: SARS-CoV-2 vaccination was associated with higher S-protein antibody titers and lower probability of radiological progression, immunomodulators requirement and respiratory support or death. However, vaccination but not antibody titters protected from adverse events pointing a role of immune-protective mechanisms in addition to humoral response.

Antecedentes: Aunque la vacunación ha reducido considerablemente el riesgo de hospitalización y muerte por COVID-19, se ha investigado poco el impacto de la vacunación y el estado de los anticuerpos anti-SARS-CoV-2 en la evolución de los pacientes que requieren hospitalización. Material y métodos: Se realizó un estudio observacional prospectivo en 232 pacientes hospitalizados por COVID-19 desde octubre del 2021 hasta enero del 2022 para evaluar el impacto en la evolución clínica del estado vacunal, el título de anticuerpos anti-SARS-CoV-2, la presencia de comorbilidades, analítica, la clínica al ingreso, tratamientos y soporte respiratorio. Se realizaron análisis de supervivencia y regresión de Cox. Se utilizaron los programas SPSS y «R¼. Resultados: Los pacientes con esquema de vacunación completo presentaron títulos de anticuerpos contra la proteína S más elevados (log10 3,73 [2,83-4,6] UI/mL vs. 1,6 [2,99-2,61] UI/mL; p < 0,001), menor probabilidad de empeoramiento radiográfico (21,6 vs. 35,4%; p = 0,005), requirieron con menor probabilidad dosis elevadas de dexametasona (28,4 vs. 45,4%; p = 0,012), oxígeno de alto flujo (20,6 vs. 35,4%; p = 0,02), ventilación (13,7 vs. 33,8%; p = 0,001) e ingresos en cuidados intensivos (10,8 vs. 32,6%; p < 0,001). El remdesivir (HR = 0,38; p < 0,001) y el esquema completo de vacunación (HR = 0,34; p = 0,008) fueron factores protectores de mala evolución. No se detectaron diferencias en el estado de los anticuerpos entre los grupos (HR = 0,58; p = 0,219). Conclusiones: La vacunación contra el SARS-CoV-2 se asoció con mayores títulos de anticuerpos contra la proteína S y menor probabilidad de progresión radiológica, requerimiento de inmunomoduladores y soporte respiratorio o muerte. Sin embargo, la vacunación, pero no los títulos de anticuerpos, protegió de los eventos adversos, lo que indica un papel de los mecanismos de protección inmunológica además de la respuesta humoral.

Role of vaccination and anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in the clinical outcome of hospitalized COVID-19 patients / Papel de la vacunación y los anticuerpos anti-SARS-CoV-2 en el desenlace clínico de pacientes hospitalizados por COVID-19

Background Although vaccination has considerably reduced the risk of hospitalization and death from COVID19, the impact of vaccination and anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody status on the outcome of patients who required hospitalization has been poorly investigated. Material and methods A prospective observational study in 232 patients hospitalized for COVID19 was carried out from October 2021 to January 2022 to evaluate the role on patient outcome of their vaccination and anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody status and titer, comorbidities, analytical determinations, clinical presentation at admission, treatments and requirements for respiratory support. Cox regression and survival analyzes were performed. The SPSS and “R” programs were used. Results Patients with complete vaccination schedule had higher S-protein antibody titers (log10 3.73 [2.83–4.6]UI/ml vs 1.6 [2.99–2.61]UI/ml; p<0.001), lower probability of radiographic worsening (21.6% vs. 35.4%; p=0.005), less likely required high doses of dexamethasone (28.4% vs. 45.4%; p=0.012), high-flow oxygen (20.6% vs. 35.4%; p=0.02), ventilation (13.7% vs, 33.8%; p=0.001) and intensive care admissions (10.8% vs. 32.6%; p<0.001). Remdesivir (HR=0.38; p<0.001) and complete vaccination schedule (HR=0.34; p=0.008) were protective factors. No differences in antibody status were detected between groups (HR=0.58; p=0.219). Conclusions SARS-CoV-2 vaccination was associated with higher S-protein antibody titers and lower probability of radiological progression, immunomodulators requirement and respiratory support or death. However, vaccination but not antibody titters protected from adverse events pointing a role of immune-protective mechanisms in addition to humoral response (AU)

Antecedentes Aunque la vacunación ha reducido considerablemente el riesgo de hospitalización y muerte por COVID-19, se ha investigado poco el impacto de la vacunación y el estado de los anticuerpos anti-SARS-CoV-2 en la evolución de los pacientes que requieren hospitalización. Material y métodos Se realizó un estudio observacional prospectivo en 232 pacientes hospitalizados por COVID-19 desde octubre del 2021 hasta enero del 2022 para evaluar el impacto en la evolución clínica del estado vacunal, el título de anticuerpos anti-SARS-CoV-2, la presencia de comorbilidades, analítica, la clínica al ingreso, tratamientos y soporte respiratorio. Se realizaron análisis de supervivencia y regresión de Cox. Se utilizaron los programas SPSS y «R». Resultados Los pacientes con esquema de vacunación completo presentaron títulos de anticuerpos contra la proteína S más elevados (log10 3,73 [2,83-4,6] UI/mL vs. 1,6 [2,99-2,61] UI/mL; p < 0,001), menor probabilidad de empeoramiento radiográfico (21,6 vs. 35,4%; p = 0,005), requirieron con menor probabilidad dosis elevadas de dexametasona (28,4 vs. 45,4%; p = 0,012), oxígeno de alto flujo (20,6 vs. 35,4%; p = 0,02), ventilación (13,7 vs. 33,8%; p = 0,001) e ingresos en cuidados intensivos (10,8 vs. 32,6%; p < 0,001). El remdesivir (HR = 0,38; p < 0,001) y el esquema completo de vacunación (HR = 0,34; p = 0,008) fueron factores protectores de mala evolución. No se detectaron diferencias en el estado de los anticuerpos entre los grupos (HR = 0,58; p = 0,219). Conclusiones La vacunación contra el SARS-CoV-2 se asoció con mayores títulos de anticuerpos contra la proteína S y menor probabilidad de progresión radiológica, requerimiento de inmunomoduladores y soporte respiratorio o muerte. Sin embargo, la vacunación, pero no los títulos de anticuerpos, protegió de los eventos adversos, lo que indica un papel de los mecanismos de protección inmunológica además de la respuesta humoral (AU)

Remdesivir plus dexamethasone is associated to improvement in the clinical outcome of COVID-19 hospitalized patients regardless of their vaccination status.

INTRODUCTION: Remdesivir seems to reduce the risk of hospitalization and improve clinical outcome in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. OBJECTIVES: To compare the clinical outcome of COVID-19 hospitalized patients treated with remdesivir plus dexamethasone versus dexamethasone alone, according to their vaccination status. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective observational study was carried out in 165 patients hospitalized for COVID-19 from October 2021 to January 2022. Multivariate logistic regression, Kaplan-Meier and the log-rank tests were used to evaluate the event (need for ventilation or death). RESULTS: Patients treated with remdesivir plus dexamethasone (n=87) compared with dexamethasone alone (n=78) showed similar age (60±16, 47-70 vs. 62±37, 51-74 years) and number of comorbidities: 1 (0-2) versus 1.5 (1-3). Among 73 fully vaccinated patients, 42 (47.1%) were in remdesivir plus dexamethasone and 31 (41%) in dexamethasone alone. Patients treated with remdesivir plus dexamethasone needed intensive care less frequently (17.2% vs. 31%; p=0.002), high-flow oxygen (25.3% vs. 50.0%; p=0.002) and non-invasive mechanical ventilation (16.1% vs. 47.4%; p<0.001). Furthermore, they had less complications during hospitalization (31.0% vs. 52.6%; p=0.008), need of antibiotics (32.2% vs. 59%; p=0.001) and radiologic worsening (21.8% vs. 44.9%; p=0.005). Treatment with remdesivir plus dexamethasone (aHR, 0.26; 95% CI: 0.14-0.48; p<0.001) and vaccination (aHR 0.39; 95% CI: 0.21-0.74) were independent factors associated with lower progression to mechanical ventilation or death. CONCLUSIONS: Remdesivir in combination with dexamethasone and vaccination independently and synergistically protects hospitalized COVID-19 patients requiring oxygen therapy from progression to severe disease or dead.

Role of vaccination and anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in the clinical outcome of hospitalized COVID-19 patients.

BACKGROUND: Although vaccination has considerably reduced the risk of hospitalization and death from COVID19, the impact of vaccination and anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody status on the outcome of patients who required hospitalization has been poorly investigated. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective observational study in 232 patients hospitalized for COVID19 was carried out from October 2021 to January 2022 to evaluate the role on patient outcome of their vaccination and anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody status and titer, comorbidities, analytical determinations, clinical presentation at admission, treatments and requirements for respiratory support. Cox regression and survival analyzes were performed. The SPSS and "R" programs were used. RESULTS: Patients with complete vaccination schedule had higher S-protein antibody titers (log10 3.73 [2.83-4.6]UI/ml vs 1.6 [2.99-2.61]UI/ml; p<0.001), lower probability of radiographic worsening (21.6% vs. 35.4%; p=0.005), less likely required high doses of dexamethasone (28.4% vs. 45.4%; p=0.012), high-flow oxygen (20.6% vs. 35.4%; p=0.02), ventilation (13.7% vs, 33.8%; p=0.001) and intensive care admissions (10.8% vs. 32.6%; p<0.001). Remdesivir (HR=0.38; p<0.001) and complete vaccination schedule (HR=0.34; p=0.008) were protective factors. No differences in antibody status were detected between groups (HR=0.58; p=0.219). CONCLUSIONS: SARS-CoV-2 vaccination was associated with higher S-protein antibody titers and lower probability of radiological progression, immunomodulators requirement and respiratory support or death. However, vaccination but not antibody titters protected from adverse events pointing a role of immune-protective mechanisms in addition to humoral response.

Is it possible to extract lower third molars with infiltration anaesthesia techniques using articaine? A double-blind randomized clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of inferior alveolar nerve blocks (IANB) with additional buccal infiltration (standard technique) and of buccal and lingual anaesthetic infiltration (experimental technique) for lower third molar (L3M) extractions. STUDY DESIGN: A randomised, double-blind clinical trial involving 129 L3M extractions was conducted. In the IANB group, an IANB was performed using the conventional approach, followed by a buccal injection in the extraction area. In the infiltration group (INF), an infiltration was performed in the buccal and lingual areas of the lower second molar. A 4% articaine solution was employed in all cases. The main outcome variable was anaesthetic efficacy. Other variables like intraoperative and postoperative pain, onset time and adverse events were also recorded. Descriptive and bivariate analyses of the data were made. RESULTS: 120 patients were randomised. The IANB group showed significantly higher anaesthetic efficacy than the INF group (64.4 vs. 45.8%) (odds ratio = 0.47; 95% confidence interval = 0.22-0.97; p = 0.042). No complications were observed. CONCLUSIONS: IANB with additional buccal infiltration is more suitable than the experimental technique for achieving adequate analgesia in L3M extractions. Moreover, the standard method is safe and provides a shorter onset time and lower initial postoperative pain levels.

GNSS Receiver Identification Using Clock-Derived Metrics.

Falsifying Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) data with a simulator or with a fake receiver can have a significant economic or safety impact in many transportation applications where Position, Velocity and Time (PVT) are used to enforce a regulation. In this context, the authentication of the source of the PVT data (i.e., the GNSS receiver) is a requirement since data faking can become a serious threat. Receiver fingerprinting techniques represent possible countermeasures to verify the authenticity of a GNSS receiver and of its data. Herein, the potential of clock-derived metrics for GNSS receiver fingerprinting is investigated, and a filter approach is implemented for feature selection. Novel experimental results show that three intrinsic features are sufficient to identify a receiver. Moreover, the adopted technique is time effective as data blocks of about 40 min are sufficient to produce stable features for fingerprinting.

Efecto de las hormonoas gonadales sobre el dimorfismo sexual en substrato de desnutrición / Effect of gonodal hormones on the sexual dimorphism in malnutrition substrate

El efecto ambiental sobre el crecimiento y el dimorfismo sexual es mediado por disfunciones endócrinas. Se ha comprobado que la desnutrición compromete al eje hipotalámico-hipofisario-glandular. Se realizó una experiencia en ratas Wistar con objeto de determinar el efecto de la administración de hormonas gonadales sobre componentes craneanos funcionales cuyo dimorfismo sexual fue alterado por desnutrición postnatal y analizar el tipo de efecto que estas hormonas tienen sobre el dimorfismo sexual. Se constituyeron cuatro tratamientos: control con consumo de dieta stock ad-libitum; subnutrición (50 por ciento del consumo promedio control); subnutrición+hormonas con inyecciones periódicas de testosterona y estradiol a machos y hembras respectivamente y sham-operado, en el cual la hormona fue sustituida por el vehículo oleoso. Se realizó un estudio radiológico longitudinal entre los 20 y 80 días de edad. Sobre cada radiografía se relevaron longitud, ancho y altura neuro y esplacnocraneanas. Con los datos obtenidos se realizó análisis de varianza y test de Mann-Whitney por medio del programa SYSTAT7.0. Los resultados obtenidos indicaron que ambas hormonas restituyeron el dimorfismo craneano sexual ya sea estimulando (testosterona) o inhibiendo (estradiol) el crecimiento de los componentes craneanos. (AU)

Efecto de las hormonoas gonadales sobre el dimorfismo sexual en substrato de desnutrición / Effect of gonodal hormones on the sexual dimorphism in malnutrition substrate

El efecto ambiental sobre el crecimiento y el dimorfismo sexual es mediado por disfunciones endócrinas. Se ha comprobado que la desnutrición compromete al eje hipotalámico-hipofisario-glandular. Se realizó una experiencia en ratas Wistar con objeto de determinar el efecto de la administración de hormonas gonadales sobre componentes craneanos funcionales cuyo dimorfismo sexual fue alterado por desnutrición postnatal y analizar el tipo de efecto que estas hormonas tienen sobre el dimorfismo sexual. Se constituyeron cuatro tratamientos: control con consumo de dieta stock ad-libitum; subnutrición (50 por ciento del consumo promedio control); subnutrición+hormonas con inyecciones periódicas de testosterona y estradiol a machos y hembras respectivamente y sham-operado, en el cual la hormona fue sustituida por el vehículo oleoso. Se realizó un estudio radiológico longitudinal entre los 20 y 80 días de edad. Sobre cada radiografía se relevaron longitud, ancho y altura neuro y esplacnocraneanas. Con los datos obtenidos se realizó análisis de varianza y test de Mann-Whitney por medio del programa SYSTAT7.0. Los resultados obtenidos indicaron que ambas hormonas restituyeron el dimorfismo craneano sexual ya sea estimulando (testosterona) o inhibiendo (estradiol) el crecimiento de los componentes craneanos.