Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Curr Radiopharm ; 10(2): 85-92, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28530533

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Breathing movement can introduce heavy bias in both image quality and quantitation in PET/CT. The aim of this paper is a review of the literature to evaluate the benefit of respiratory gating in terms of image quality, quantification and lesion detectability. METHODS: A review of the literature published in the last 10 years and dealing with gated PET/CT technique has been performed, focusing on improvement in quantification, lesion detectability and diagnostic accuracy in neoplastic lesion. In addition, the improvement in the definition of radiotherapy planning has been evaluated. RESULTS: There is a consistent increase of the Standardized Uptake Value (SUV) in gated PET images when compared to ungated ones, particularly for lesions located in liver and in lung. Respiratory gating can also increase sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of PET/CT. Gated PET/CT can be used for radiation therapy planning, reducing the uncertainty in target definition, optimizing the volume to be treated and reducing the possibility of "missing" during the dose delivery. Moreover, new technologies, able to define the movement of lesions and organs directly from the PET sinogram, can solve some problems that currently are limiting the clinical use of gated PET/CT (i.e.: extended acquisition time, radiation exposure). CONCLUSION: The published literature demonstrated that respiratory gating PET/CT is a valid technique to improve quantification, lesion detectability of lung and liver tumors and can better define the radiotherapy planning of moving lesions and organs. If new technical improvements for motion compensation will be clinically validated, gated technique could be applied routinely in any PET/CT scan.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography/methods , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted , Respiratory-Gated Imaging Techniques/methods , Humans , Radiopharmaceuticals , Sensitivity and Specificity
2.
World J Radiol ; 7(12): 509-20, 2015 Dec 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26753066

ABSTRACT

AIM: To assess the clinical diagnostic value of functional imaging, combining quantitative parameters of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and standardized uptake value (SUV)max, before and after chemo-radiation therapy, in prediction of tumor response of patients with rectal cancer, related to tumor regression grade at histology. METHODS: A total of 31 patients with biopsy proven diagnosis of rectal carcinoma were enrolled in our study. All patients underwent a whole body (18)FDG positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) scan and a pelvic magnetic resonance (MR) examination including diffusion weighted (DW) imaging for staging (PET1, RM1) and after completion (6.6 wk) of neoadjuvant treatment (PET2, RM2). Subsequently all patients underwent total mesorectal excision and the histological results were compared with imaging findings. The MR scanning, performed on 1.5 T magnet (Philips, Achieva), included T2-weighted multiplanar imaging and in addition DW images with b-value of 0 and 1000 mm²/s. On PET/CT the SUVmax of the rectal lesion were calculated in PET1 and PET2. The percentage decrease of SUVmax (ΔSUV) and ADC (ΔADC) values from baseline to presurgical scan were assessed and correlated with pathologic response classified as tumor regression grade (Mandard's criteria; TRG1 = complete regression, TRG5 = no regression). RESULTS: After completion of therapy, all the patients were submitted to surgery. According to the Mandard's criteria, 22 tumors showed complete (TRG1) or subtotal regression (TRG2) and were classified as responders; 9 tumors were classified as non responders (TRG3, 4 and 5). Considering all patients the mean values of SUVmax in PET 1 was higher than the mean value of SUVmax in PET 2 (P < 0.001), whereas the mean ADC values was lower in RM1 than RM2 (P < 0.001), with a ΔSUV and ΔADC respectively of 60.2% and 66.8%. The best predictors for TRG response were SUV2 (threshold of 4.4) and ADC2 (1.29 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s) with high sensitivity and specificity. Combining in a single analysis both the obtained median value, the positive predictive value, in predicting the different group category response in related to TRG system, presented R(2) of 0.95. CONCLUSION: The functional imaging combining ADC and SUVmax in a single analysis permits to detect changes in cellular tissue structures useful for the assessment of tumour response after the neoadjuvant therapy in rectal cancer, increasing the sensitivity in correct depiction of treatment response than either method alone.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...