ABSTRACT
AIM: The aim of the present study was to address the economic cost of the innovative comprehensive approach involving cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) to treat peritoneal surface malignancies, and to compare it with the financial support received by our centre. METHODS: A retrospective economic analysis was carried out on 382 consecutive procedures performed at a tertiary referral centre during the period 1995-2008. The costs of the combined therapy were estimated using the activity-based costing methodology. The financial support was assessed according to the current diagnosis-related group classification and reimbursement rates. RESULTS: The mean cost for one hospital stay was euro36,015.89 (range 28,435.24-82,189.08); mean length of stay was 24.3 days (range 9-108). In counterpart, our hospital received a total financial support of euro804,483.30, resulting in a deficit of euro1861,301.99 for the two years. CONCLUSION: The Italian current diagnosis-related groups classification does not include cytoreduction and HIPEC. This results in a relevant economic deficit for the hospitals offering this treatment option to their patients and a slow diffusion of the technique in our country. Two corrective measures are needed: to include this procedure in the official list of medical acts, and to determine its specific cost for reimbursing.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/economics , Hyperthermia, Induced/economics , Peritoneal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Peritoneal Neoplasms/surgery , Surgical Procedures, Operative/economics , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage , Combined Modality Therapy/economics , Costs and Cost Analysis , Female , Humans , Infusions, Parenteral , Insurance, Health, Reimbursement , Male , Middle Aged , Peritoneal Neoplasms/economics , Retrospective Studies , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Aim of this study was to identify subgroups of adults with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (T1DM) treated with Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion (CSII) at higher risk of poor quality of life (QoL). A sample of consecutive patients completed the Diabetes Specific Quality of Life Scale (DSQOLS), investigating the daily burden and restrictions related to diabetes. Lower DSQOLS scores indicate worse QoL perception. METHODS AND RESULTS: The main results were obtained by using a regression-tree technique (RECursive Partitioning and AMalgamation - RECPAM) and multivariate logistic regression. Overall, 472 patients aged between 18 and 55 years were recruited by 43 Italian centers. RECPAM analysis led to the identification of 5 classes characterized by a marked difference in QoL. Male patients not reporting episodes of ketoacidosis and using CSII for >2 years had the lowest likelihood of scoring in the lower tertile of the DSQOLS summary score, and thus represented the reference category. Patients who reported > or =1 ketoacidosis episodes (OR = 5.4; 95% CI 2.4-12.1) and female patients with a duration of diabetes of <10 years (OR = 5.9; 95% CI 2.6-13.5) had the highest likelihood of reporting poor QoL, while females with longer diabetes duration (OR = 2.4; 95% CI 1.3-4.7) and males treated with CSII for < or =2 years (OR = 2.2; 95% CI 1.1-4.6) showed a two-fold risk of poor QoL. Patient age, diabetic complications and civil status were globally predictive variables associated with poor QoL. CONCLUSION: We identified subgroups of T1DM individuals treated with CSII showing a major impairment in QoL. Specific strategies are needed to help the patient cope with this therapeutic modality, especially during the initial phase of treatment.
Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/physiopathology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/psychology , Insulin Infusion Systems/psychology , Insulin/administration & dosage , Quality of Life/psychology , Activities of Daily Living , Adolescent , Adult , Attitude to Health , Cost of Illness , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/drug therapy , Diabetic Ketoacidosis/psychology , Female , Humans , Injections, Subcutaneous , Insulin/analogs & derivatives , Insulin/therapeutic use , Male , Middle Aged , Risk Factors , Sex Characteristics , Statistics as Topic , Surveys and Questionnaires , Time Factors , Young AdultABSTRACT
AIMS: The aim of this case-control study was to compare quality of life (QoL) and treatment satisfaction in adults with Type 1 diabetes (T1DM) treated with either continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) or multiple daily injections (MDI). METHODS: Consecutive patients aged between 18 and 55 years, and attending diabetes clinics for a routine visit, completed the Diabetes-Specific Quality-of-Life Scale (DSQOLS), the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ) and the SF-36 Health Survey (SF-36). Case (CSII) and control subjects (MDI) were recruited in a 1 : 2 ratio. RESULTS: Overall, 1341 individuals were enrolled by 62 diabetes clinics; 481 were cases and 860 control subjects. Cases had a longer diabetes duration and were more likely to have eye and renal complications. Age, school education, occupation and HbA(1c) were similar. Of control subjects, 90% followed glargine-based MDI regimens and 10% used NPH-based MDI regimens. On multivariate analysis, after adjusting for socioeconomic and clinical characteristics, scores in the following areas of the DSQOLS were higher in cases than control subjects: diet restrictions (beta = 5.96; P < 0.0001), daily hassles (beta = 3.57; P = 0.01) and fears about hypoglycaemia (beta = 3.88; P = 0.006). Treatment with CSII was also associated with a markedly higher DTSQ score (beta = 4.13; P < 0.0001) compared with MDI. Results were similar when CSII was compared separately with glargine- or NPH-based MDI regimens. CONCLUSIONS: This large, non-randomized, case-control study suggests quality of life gains deriving from greater lifestyle flexibility, less fear of hypoglycaemia, and higher treatment satisfaction, when CSII is compared with either glargine-based or NPH-based MDI regimens.
