Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
2.
Can J Neurol Sci ; 47(1): 100-108, 2020 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31549602

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Rapid eye movement (REM) sleep behavior disorder (RBD) and REM sleep without atonia (RWA) have assumed much clinical importance with long-term data showing progression into neurodegenerative conditions among older adults. However, much less is known about RBD and RWA in younger populations. This study aims at comparing clinical and polysomnographic (PSG) characteristics of young patients presenting with RBD, young patients with other neurological conditions, and normal age-matched subjects. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was carried out for consecutive young patients (<25 years) presenting with clinical features of RBD; and data were compared to data from patients with epilepsy, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and autism, as well as normal subjects who underwent PSG during a 2-year-period. RESULTS: Twelve patients fulfilling RBD diagnostic criteria, 22 autism patients, 10 with ADHD, 30 with epilepsy, and 14 normal subjects were included. Eight patients with autism (30%), three with ADHD (30%), one with epilepsy (3.3%), and six patients who had presented with RBD like symptoms (50%) had abnormal movements and behaviors during REM sleep. Excessive transient muscle activity and/or sustained muscle activity during REM epochs was found in all patients who had presented with RBD, in 16/22 (72%) autistic patients, 6/10 (60%) ADHD patients compared to only 6/30 (20%) patients with epilepsy and in none of the normal subjects. CONCLUSION: We observed that a large percentage of young patients with autism and ADHD and some with epilepsy demonstrate loss of REM-associated atonia and some RBD-like behaviors on polysomnography similar to young patients presenting with RBD.


Troubles du comportement en sommeil paradoxal et sommeil paradoxal sans atonie musculaire chez les jeunes. Contexte: Les troubles du comportement en sommeil paradoxal (TCSP) et le sommeil paradoxal sans atonie musculaire ont acquis une grande importance clinique. En effet, des données à long terme ont montré de quelle façon ils pouvaient progresser chez des adultes âgés atteints de maladies neurodégénératives. Toutefois, on en sait beaucoup moins au sujet des TCSP et du sommeil paradoxal sans atonie musculaire au sein des groupes d'âges plus jeunes. Cette étude entend donc comparer les caractéristiques cliniques et polysomnographiques (PSG) de jeunes patients donnant à voir des signes de TCSP à celles d'autres jeunes patients atteints d'autres troubles neurologiques et de sujets en bonne santé appariés en fonction de l'âge. Méthodes: Nous avons passé en revue de façon rétrospective les dossiers de jeunes patients (< 25 ans) donnant à voir des signes cliniques de TCSP et ayant été vus consécutivement. Les données recueillies ont été comparées aux données de patients atteints d'épilepsie, de troubles de l'attention avec hyperactivité et d'autisme ainsi qu'à celles de sujets en bonne santé soumis à des examens de PSG pendant une période de deux ans. Résultats: Au total, on a diagnostiqué chez 12 patients des TCSP. Ajoutons que 22 d'entre eux étaient atteints d'autisme alors que 10 étaient atteints de troubles de l'attention avec hyperactivité et 30 d'épilepsie. Mentionnons par ailleurs que 14 sujets en bonne santé ont été inclus dans cette étude. Après analyse, il s'est avéré que 8 patients atteints d'autisme (30 %), 3 de troubles de l'attention avec hyperactivité (30 %), 1 d'épilepsie (3,3 %) et 6 ayant donné à voir des symptômes ressemblant à ceux des TCSP (50 %) montraient des mouvements et des comportement anormaux en sommeil paradoxal. Des signes d'activité musculaire transitoire excessive et/ou d'activité musculaire durable lors d'épisodes de sommeil paradoxal ont été détectés chez tous les patients satisfaisant aux critères des TCSP, chez 16 patients autistes sur 22 (72 %), chez 6 patients atteint de troubles de l'attention avec hyperactivité sur 10 (60 %) en comparaison avec seulement 6 patients épileptiques sur 30 (20 %) et aucun parmi les sujets en bonne santé. Conclusion: Lors d'examens polysomnographiques, nous avons en définitive observé qu'une forte proportion de jeunes patients atteints d'autisme et de troubles de l'attention avec hyperactivité, ainsi que quelques-uns atteints d'épilepsie, donnaient à voir des signes de perte de sommeil paradoxal associés à l'atonie musculaire ainsi que des comportements ressemblant à ceux de jeunes patients atteints de TCSP.

3.
Ann Indian Acad Neurol ; 22(2): 199-202, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31007433

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: A large proportion of the population suffers from disturbed sleep and a majority of these present to clinicians with the complaint of insomnia. Many of these people possibly suffer from other primary sleep disorders such as sleep apnea; however, insomnia disorder also remains an extremely common condition directly impacting the quality of life and work efficiency of affected people. While a number of approaches are used for treatment by many clinicians, a much smaller percentage can seek help from specialty sleep clinics. Since very little data are available regarding the effectiveness of treatment offered, this retrospective study aims at examining the outcome of chronic insomnia patients attending to a quaternary care specialty sleep center. METHODS: Consecutive patients with the presenting complaint of and diagnosis of insomnia, during a study period of 2 years between 2013 and 2015, were identified and analyzed. Patients were classified based on the comorbidity and types of treatment received. Life stressors were also identified and analyzed. Outcomes were reviewed for those who had follow-up data available. RESULTS: Based on the defined inclusion criteria, 102 patients could be analyzed. Among these, at least 3-month follow-up was available for 48 patients. It was observed that among patients for whom at least 3-month follow-up was available, 91.4% (43/48) showed a good response to treatment with physician-administered cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia along with treatment for comorbid conditions. CONCLUSION: With correct diagnostic classification, as well as appropriate and easily available treatment strategies, excellent treatment outcomes are observed at specialty sleep clinics.

4.
Epilepsy Behav ; 92: 176-183, 2019 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30665125

ABSTRACT

We aimed to evaluate the effect of sleep quality on memory, executive function, and language performance in patients with refractory focal epilepsy and controlled epilepsy and compare these with healthy individuals. We prospectively enrolled 37 adolescent and adult patients with refractory focal epilepsy (Group 1) and controlled epilepsy (Group 2) in each group. History pertaining to epilepsy and sleep were recorded, and all patients underwent overnight polysomnography. Language, memory, and executive function assessments were done using Western Aphasia Battery, Post Graduate Institute (PGI) memory scale, and battery of four executive function tests (Trail Making Test A & B, Digit symbol test, Stroop Task, and Verbal Fluency Test), respectively. Forty age- and sex-matched controls were also included in the study. Significant differences were noted in both objective and subjective sleep parameters among all the groups. On polysomnography, parameters like total sleep time, sleep efficiency, sleep latency, and rapid eye movement (REM) latency were found to be significantly worse in Group 1 as compared with Group 2. Cognitive and executive parameters were significantly impaired in Group 1. Shorter total sleep time, poorer sleep efficiency, and prolonged sleep latencies were observed to be associated with poor memory and executive function in patients with refractory epilepsy. Our study strongly suggests that sleep disturbances, mainly shorter total sleep time, poor sleep efficiency, and prolonged sleep latencies, are associated with impaired memory and executive function in patients with refractory focal epilepsy and to a lesser extent, among those with medically controlled epilepsy.


Subject(s)
Drug Resistant Epilepsy/complications , Epilepsies, Partial/complications , Executive Function/physiology , Language , Memory/physiology , Sleep Wake Disorders/complications , Sleep/physiology , Adolescent , Adult , Drug Resistant Epilepsy/physiopathology , Drug Resistant Epilepsy/psychology , Epilepsies, Partial/drug therapy , Epilepsies, Partial/physiopathology , Epilepsies, Partial/psychology , Female , Humans , Male , Neuropsychological Tests , Polysomnography , Prospective Studies , Sleep Wake Disorders/physiopathology , Sleep Wake Disorders/psychology , Trail Making Test , Young Adult
5.
J Clin Sleep Med ; 14(4): 511-521, 2018 04 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29609704

ABSTRACT

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is an independent risk factor for stroke. The objective of this study was to assess the effect of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment on prevention of new vascular events among patients with stroke and OSA. METHODS: Consecutive conscious patients presenting with first imaging-confirmed arterial stroke were included, 6 weeks or more after ictus. All patients underwent clinical and polysomnography (PSG) testing. Patients with an apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) of > 15 events/h were randomized to posttitration nightly CPAP treatment and non-CPAP (received best medical treatment) groups. On follow-up at 3, 6, and 12 months from randomization, evaluation was carried out for any new vascular events as the primary outcome measure, and for clinical stroke outcomes (using the Barthel Index and modified Rankin scale) and neuropsychological parameters as the secondary outcome measures. RESULTS: Among the 679 patients with stroke who were screened, 116 reported for PSG, 83 had AHI > 15 events/h, and 70 (34 in CPAP and 36 in non-CPAP) were randomized. Thirteen patients could not be randomized because of a lack of CPAP devices. Four patients crossed over from the CPAP to the non-CPAP group. Age (mean age 53.41 ± 9.85 in CPAP versus 52.69 ± 13.23 years in non-CPAP, P = .81) and sex distribution (24 males in CPAP versus 33 males in non-CPAP, P = .79) were similar in both groups. At 12-month follow-up, there was 1 vascular event (3.33%) in the CPAP group and 6 events (15%) in the non-CPAP group (P = .23). Modified Rankin scale score improvement by ≥ 1 at 12-month follow-up was found in significantly more patients in the CPAP group than in the non-CPAP group (53% versus 27%). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest significantly better stroke outcomes and statistically nonsignificant favorable outcomes in terms of recurrence of vascular events for patients with stroke and OSA who use CPAP treatment. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registry: Clinical Trials Registry - India, CTRI Registration No: CTRI/2016/07.007104, Title: Sleep Disordered Breathing in stroke patients: Effect of treatment trial, URL: http://ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/showallp.php?mid1=8682&EncHid=&userName=sleep%20disordered%20breathing.


Subject(s)
Continuous Positive Airway Pressure , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/complications , Stroke/prevention & control , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Continuous Positive Airway Pressure/methods , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Polysomnography , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/therapy , Stroke/complications , Time Factors
6.
Epilepsy Behav ; 64(Pt A): 216-218, 2016 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27756024

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Levetiracetam (LEV) is often chosen early in the treatment of refractory epilepsy; however, its adverse effects have largely been studied as part of clinical trials. Oxcarbazepine and valproate (VPA) are the other commonly used AEDs and, hence, serve as good comparators. This study was conducted to evaluate behavioral abnormalities and somnolence among patients with epilepsy being treated with LEV and/or OXC compared with those receiving VPA. METHOD: Data of consecutive patients attending our intractable epilepsy clinic over a 2 1/2-year period were reviewed, and patients with at least one seizure a month, who had been initiated on either or a combination of LEV, VPA, or OXC, were included for analysis. Data regarding behavioral adverse effects, daytime somnolence (EDS), and weight changes were collected apart from those regarding any major effect necessitating dose reduction or discontinuation of the AED. RESULTS: Among a total of 445 patients screened, 292 (93 F, median age: 21years [range: 8-54]; 237 focal and 55 generalized epilepsy) fulfilled inclusion criteria. Median epilepsy duration was 11years. Levetiracetam had been introduced in 114 patients, VPA in 134, and OXC in 151 during the study period. Twenty-three were on LEV+OXC, 27 on LEV+VPA, and 33 on VPA+OXC. Behavioral disturbances (irritability, obsessive manifestations, aggressiveness, and frank psychosis) were observed in 43 patients; 23 on introduction of LEV (20.2%); LEV was discontinued in 10 (9%). Daytime somnolence was reported by 28 patients, 15 on OXC (10%); 8 received oral modafinil for the same, while none discontinued this AED. Only one patient on LEV and 3 on VPA reported EDS. Menstrual disturbances were reported by 9, weight gain by 3, and severe hair loss by 2 females on VPA. CONCLUSION: Behavioral disturbances with levetiracetam are common among patients with refractory epilepsy while somnolence is common with oxcarbazepine. Antiepileptic drugs should be selected with this in perspective.


Subject(s)
Anticonvulsants/adverse effects , Carbamazepine/analogs & derivatives , Disorders of Excessive Somnolence/chemically induced , Drug Resistant Epilepsy/drug therapy , Obsessive Behavior/chemically induced , Piracetam/analogs & derivatives , Psychoses, Substance-Induced/diagnosis , Adolescent , Adult , Anticonvulsants/therapeutic use , Carbamazepine/adverse effects , Carbamazepine/therapeutic use , Child , Female , Humans , Irritable Mood/drug effects , Levetiracetam , Male , Middle Aged , Oxcarbazepine , Piracetam/adverse effects , Piracetam/therapeutic use , Retrospective Studies , Young Adult
7.
Epilepsy Res ; 109: 72-80, 2015 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25524845

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Cognitive impairment has long been recognized as a co-morbidity or sequel to refractory epilepsy. This study was conducted to evaluate the degree and selectivity of involvement of memory, language and executive functions performance among patients with temporal (TLE) versus extratemporal epilepsy (ETLE). METHODS: We prospectively enrolled adolescent and adult patients with medically refractory focal epilepsy, who had undergone pre-surgical evaluation. Language, memory and executive function assessment was done using Western Aphasia Battery, PGI memory scale and battery of four executive function tests (trail making test A & B, digit symbol test, Stroop Task and verbal fluency test), respectively. RESULTS: Among102 patients enrolled (TLE-59, ETLE-43), mean age of patients 23.0 4± 8.3 years, 83 (82%) had impairment of more than one cognitive domain and 21 (21%) had all three domains involved. Severely impaired memory scores were found in 8.6% patients with MTLE-HS, 8% of the rest of the patients with TLE and 7% patients with ETLE. The differences in the mean scores were also not found statistically significant (p=0.669). Naming impairment was the most common language abnormality, although all aphasia subscores were similar for the ETLE and TLE groups. Executive function impairment was the most common cognitive domain affected. Overall performance on executive function tests was found impaired in almost all patients of both groups without any significant inter-group difference, except on Trail-A test, which revealed better results in patients with mTLE-HS as compared to all other sub-groups. CONCLUSION: Our study shows that impairment of memory, language and executive function is common among patients with drug refractory epilepsy. The most prevalent impairment is in executive function. There is no significant difference in the degree, prevalence or selectivity of impairment in either of the three domains, between the TLE versus ETLE groups.


Subject(s)
Epilepsies, Partial/psychology , Executive Function , Language , Memory , Adolescent , Adult , Brain/pathology , Brain/physiopathology , Child , Epilepsies, Partial/epidemiology , Epilepsies, Partial/pathology , Epilepsies, Partial/physiopathology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Neuropsychological Tests , Prevalence , Prospective Studies , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...