Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 12 de 12
Filter
1.
Eur Geriatr Med ; 13(1): 291-304, 2022 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34800286

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To describe a guidance on the management of post-acute COVID 19 patients in geriatric rehabilitation. METHODS: The guidance is based on guidelines for post-acute COVID-19 geriatric rehabilitation developed in the Netherlands, updated with recent insights from literature, related guidance from other countries and disciplines, and combined with experiences from experts in countries participating in the Geriatric Rehabilitation Special Interest Group of the European Geriatric Medicine Society. RESULTS: This guidance for post-acute COVID-19 rehabilitation is divided into a section addressing general recommendations for geriatric rehabilitation and a section addressing specific processes and procedures. The Sect. "General recommendations for geriatric rehabilitation" addresses: (1) general requirements for post-acute COVID-19 rehabilitation and (2) critical aspects for quality assurance during COVID-19 pandemic. The Sect. "Specific processes and procedures", addresses the following topics: (1) patient selection; (2) admission; (3) treatment; (4) discharge; and (5) follow-up and monitoring. CONCLUSION: Providing tailored geriatric rehabilitation treatment to post-acute COVID-19 patients is a challenge for which the guidance is designed to provide support. There is a strong need for additional evidence on COVID-19 geriatric rehabilitation including developing an understanding of risk profiles of older patients living with frailty to develop individualised treatment regimes. The present guidance will be regularly updated based on additional evidence from practice and research.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Frailty , Geriatrics , Aged , Humans , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2
2.
Healthcare (Basel) ; 9(7)2021 Jul 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34356283

ABSTRACT

The recognition and treatment of pain in nursing home residents presents challenges best addressed by a multidisciplinary approach. This approach is also recommended in the applicable Dutch guideline; however, translating guidelines into practical strategies is often difficult in nursing homes. Nevertheless, a better understanding of guideline implementation is key to improving the quality of care. Here we describe and qualitatively evaluate the implementation process of the multidisciplinary guideline 'Recognition and treatment of chronic pain in vulnerable elderly' in a Dutch nursing home. The researchers used interviews and document analyses to study the nursing home's implementation of the guideline. The project team of the nursing home first filled out an implementation matrix to formulate goals based on preferred knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors for the defined target groups. Together with experts and organizations, pharmacotherapy audit meetings were organized, an expert pain team was appointed, a policy document and policy flowchart were prepared, and 'anchor personnel' were assigned to disseminate knowledge amongst professionals. Implementation was partially successful and resulted in a functioning pain team, a pain policy, the selection of preferred measurement instruments, and pain becoming a fixed topic during multidisciplinary meetings. Nevertheless, relatively few professionals were aware of the implementation process.

3.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31467672

ABSTRACT

In 2012, the Dutch Working Party for Infection Control (WIP) issued the first Guideline for prevention of transmission of highly-resistant micro-organisms (HRMO) in Hospitals. The next step was to focus on long-term care facilities (LTCFs) both for nursing homes as for small-scale living facilities with nursing home care. These facilities providing care for residents with functional disabilities, chronical illnesses and cognitive disorders, such as dementia. The objective was to adapt the Guideline for prevention of transmission of HRMO in hospitals to LTCFs with a strong accent on living conditions and social interactions. Residents of LTCFs may be carriers of HRMO over a long period of time and most of the residents of the LTCF stay for extended periods of time. To respect individual living circumstances and to prevent unnecessary limitations in the social life of the residents due to the use of isolation measures, the WIP has chosen to describe infection control precautions per individual micro-organism instead of a 'one size fits all' method. The term "isolation" was therefore replaced by the term "additional" precautions. This guideline describes the screening policies for residents in LTCFs, definition and detection of HRMO carriage, standard and additional infection control precautions for HRMO positive residents, documentation and communication of HRMO carriage and discontinuation of additional infection control precautions. It also describes contact tracing of HRMO, environmental control/investigation, surveillance of HRMO and what is important when there is an outbreak.


Subject(s)
Carrier State/diagnosis , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Infection Control/standards , Bacteria/classification , Bacteria/drug effects , Bacteria/isolation & purification , Carrier State/microbiology , Cross Infection/transmission , Evidence-Based Medicine , Health Policy , Humans , Infection Control/methods , Long-Term Care , Netherlands/epidemiology , Nursing Homes , Patient Transfer , Practice Guidelines as Topic
4.
J Patient Saf ; 15(3): 224-229, 2019 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29112022

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Inadequate patient handovers are associated with the occurrence of medical errors. The objective of the present study was to explore the structure and quality of handovers in the acute medical assessment unit. METHODS: A prospective observational study was conducted in an academic hospital in the Netherlands. Handover structure was observed by ordering handover information according to the elements of the Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation, and Read back (SBAR-R) handover tool. Handover quality was measured by means of a questionnaire, i.e., the rating tool for handover quality, and by assessing situation awareness of the degree to which professionals after a handover agreed on the complexity of the patient's care needs. RESULTS: A total of 71 handovers were observed. In most handovers, different elements of the SBAR-R were used frequently (median, 7.5 elements; range, 2.0-15.0). On the quality of handovers, 109 respondents (44.1%) completed the questionnaire. On a 0-to-100 scale, median scores on information transfer were 67.9 (interquartile range [IQR],17.9), 75.0 (IQR, 25.0) on shared understanding, and 75.0 (IQR, 16.7) on working atmosphere. Agreement in situation awareness was 70.0%. CONCLUSIONS: Handovers in the acute medical assessment unit were poorly structured; however, the perceived quality of handovers was substantial. Implementing the SBAR-R may be an effective strategy to improve handover practice and situation awareness, although further study to its applicability in acute medical assessment units is necessary.


Subject(s)
Patient Handoff/standards , Quality of Health Care/standards , Cross-Cultural Comparison , Female , Humans , Male , Prospective Studies
5.
J Eval Clin Pract ; 20(2): 166-75, 2014 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24354710

ABSTRACT

RATIONALE, AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: Loss of situation awareness (SA) by health professionals during handover is a major threat to patient safety in perinatal care. SA refers to knowing what is going on around. Adequate handover communication and process may support situation assessment, a precursor of SA. This study describes current practices and opinions of perinatal handover to identify potential improvements. METHODS: Structured direct observations of shift-to-shift patient handovers (n = 70) in an academic perinatal setting were used to measure handover communication (presence and order of levels of SA: current situation, background, assessment and recommendation) and process (duration, interruptions/distractions, eye contact, active inquiry and reading information back). Afterwards, receivers' opinions of handover communication (n = 51) were measured by means of a questionnaire. RESULTS: All levels of SA were present in 7% of handovers, the current situation in 86%, the background in 99%, an assessment in 24% and a recommendation in 46%. In 77% of handovers the background was mentioned first, followed by the current situation. Forty-four per cent of handovers took 2 minutes or more per patient. In 52% distractions occurred, in 43% there was no active inquiry, in 32% no eye contact and in 97% information was not read back. The overall mean of the receivers' opinions of handover communication was 4.1 (standard deviation ± 0.7; scale 1-5, where 5 is excellent). CONCLUSIONS: Perinatal handovers are currently at risk for inadequate situation assessment because of variability and limitations in handover communication and process. However, receivers' opinions of handover communication were very positive, indicating a lack of awareness of patient safety threats during handover. Therefore, the staff's awareness of current limitations should be raised, for example through video reflection or simulation training.


Subject(s)
Communication , Patient Handoff/organization & administration , Patient Safety , Perinatal Care/organization & administration , Academic Medical Centers , Continuity of Patient Care/organization & administration , Female , Humans , Labor, Obstetric , Medical Staff, Hospital/organization & administration , Nursing Staff, Hospital/organization & administration , Patient Handoff/standards , Perinatal Care/standards , Pregnancy , Task Performance and Analysis , Time Factors
6.
Int J Nurs Stud ; 46(9): 1256-64, 2009 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19371873

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Implementation of innovations is a complex and intensive procedure in which different strategies can be successful. In nursing, strategies often focus on intrinsic motivation, competencies and attitudes of individual nurses while ignoring the social context. Since nurses often work in teams, identifying relevant team characteristics and successful team directed strategies may contribute to the implementation of innovations. The literature was searched for evidence. METHODS: A literature review was performed including key words related to nursing teams, innovations, team characteristics and team-directed strategies. On-line databases were searched (MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, ERIC database and Cochrane reviews CENTRAL). The journal Quality and Safety in Healthcare (QSHC) was hand searched. Methodological quality was assessed. RESULTS: Initially, 323 titles were found. Screening of titles and abstracts and full texts resulted in nine articles meeting the inclusion criteria. The methodological quality of the studies was generally low. The innovations included different types of practices. Fifteen different team characteristics were labeled according to six features of successful teams. Twenty-one different team-directed strategies were identified and inductively categorized. CONCLUSION: Few studies and little evidence were found for the relevance of team characteristics and team directed strategies in the implementation of nursing innovations. Feedback was most frequently used as a strategy. Leadership could be labeled as a team characteristic as well as a team directed strategy. Further research should be of good methodological quality and focusing on patient outcomes and time and costs invested in strategy delivery. This increases scientific knowledge on nursing implementation strategies focusing on leadership.


Subject(s)
Nursing , Patient Care Team , Attitude of Health Personnel , Humans , Nurses/psychology
7.
J Clin Nurs ; 18(1): 3-12, 2009 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19120727

ABSTRACT

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to identify and to assess the quality of evidence-based guidelines and systematic reviews we used in the case of oral mucositis, to apply general quality criteria for the prevention and treatment of oral mucositis in patients receiving chemotherapy, radiotherapy or both. DESIGN: Systematic review. METHODS: Literature searches were carried out in several electronic databases and websites. Publications were included if they concerned oral mucositis involving adults treated for cancer and had been published after 1 January 2000. As far as systematic reviews were concerned, the article had to report a search strategy, if the search was minimally conducted in the database PubMed or Medline and the articles included in the review were subjected to some kind of methodological assessment. The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Education (AGREE) instrument was used to assess the quality of the guidelines and the Overview Quality Assessment Questionnaire (OQAQ) was used for the quality of systematic reviews. RESULTS: Thirty-one articles met the inclusion criteria of which 11 were guidelines and 20 were systematic reviews. Nine of the 11 guidelines did not explicitly describe how they identified, selected and summarised the available evidence. Reviews suffered from lack of clarity, for instance, in performing a thorough literature search. The quality varied among the different guidelines and reviews. CONCLUSION: Most guidelines and systematic reviews had serious methodological flaws. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: There is a need to improve the methodological quality of guidelines and systematic reviews for the prevention and treatment of oral mucositis if they are to be used in clinical practice.


Subject(s)
Practice Guidelines as Topic , Stomatitis/therapy , Systematic Reviews as Topic , Adult , Evidence-Based Medicine , Humans , Neoplasms/complications , Quality Assurance, Health Care , Stomatitis/complications , Surveys and Questionnaires
8.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 7: 47, 2007 Apr 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17408472

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Many patients encounter a variety of problems after discharge from hospital and many discharge (planning and support) interventions have been developed and studied. These primary studies have already been synthesized in several literature reviews with conflicting conclusions. We therefore set out a systematic review of the reviews examining discharge interventions. The objective was to synthesize the evidence presented in literature on the effectiveness of interventions aimed to reduce post-discharge problems in adults discharged home from an acute general care hospital. METHODS: A comprehensive search of seventeen literature databases and twenty-five websites was performed for the period 1994-2004 to find relevant reviews. A three-stage inclusion process consisting of initial sifting, checking full-text papers on inclusion criteria, and methodological assessment, was performed independently by two reviewers. Data on effects were synthesized by use of narrative and tabular methods. RESULTS: Fifteen systematic reviews met our inclusion criteria. All reviews had to deal with considerable heterogeneity in interventions, populations and outcomes, making synthesizing and pooling difficult. Although a statistical significant effect was occasionally found, most review authors reached no firm conclusions that the discharge interventions they studied were effective. We found limited evidence that some interventions may improve knowledge of patients, may help in keeping patients at home or may reduce readmissions to hospital. Interventions that combine discharge planning and discharge support tend to lead to the greatest effects. There is little evidence that discharge interventions have an impact on length of stay, discharge destination or dependency at discharge. We found no evidence that discharge interventions have a positive impact on the physical status of patients after discharge, on health care use after discharge, or on costs. CONCLUSION: Based on fifteen high quality systematic reviews, there is some evidence that some interventions may have a positive impact, particularly those with educational components and those that combine pre-discharge and post-discharge interventions. However, on the whole there is only limited summarized evidence that discharge planning and discharge support interventions have a positive impact on patient status at hospital discharge, on patient functioning after discharge, on health care use after discharge, or on costs.


Subject(s)
Activities of Daily Living , Home Care Services, Hospital-Based , Home Care Services , Patient Discharge , Patient Education as Topic/methods , Patient Readmission , Adult , Humans , Length of Stay , Patient Education as Topic/economics , Quality of Life , Survival Analysis
9.
Dermatol Nurs ; 16(1): 43-6, 49-57, 2004 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15022504

ABSTRACT

Intertrigo is an inflammatory dermatosis of the skin folds of the body, for which a large variety of topical medications may be recommended. A systematic literature review was performed to find scientific evidence for preventing and treating intertrigo within the nursing domain. Seven electronic databases were searched with a simple broad-scope search strategy. The aim was to identify all publications that concerned intertrigo itself and other conditions that were related to intertriginous regions. This search produced 451 references. A final set of 24 studies was retained and analyzed on content and methodologic quality. Most studies concerned treatments with antifungals or disinfectants in heterogeneous research samples, with only small subsamples of people with intertrigo. Six studies were randomized controlled trials. In general, the methodologic quality of the studies was poor. The analyzed studies provided no scientific evidence for any type of nursing prevention or treatment strategy. There is a great need for well-designed clinical studies on intertrigo.


Subject(s)
Intertrigo/therapy , Skin Care/methods , Administration, Topical , Adult , Antifungal Agents/therapeutic use , Disinfectants/therapeutic use , Evidence-Based Medicine , Humans , Intertrigo/classification , Intertrigo/diagnosis , Intertrigo/etiology , Patient Selection , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Primary Prevention , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic/standards , Research Design/standards , Sample Size , Skin Care/nursing , Skin Care/standards , Treatment Outcome
10.
Nurse Res ; 12(2): 71-80, 2004.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15636007

ABSTRACT

In this paper, Patriek Mistiaen, Else Poot, Sophie Hickox, and Cordula Wagner describe how they conducted a search of the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews in order to explore the evidence for nursing interventions. They identify the number of studies, the number of participants, and the conclusions of systematic reviews concerning nursing interventions. They conclude that the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews is a valuable source of evidence about nursing interventions, and can be used as a means of developing a research agenda in the case of inconclusive reviews.


Subject(s)
Databases, Bibliographic/standards , Nursing Research/organization & administration , Review Literature as Topic , Bibliometrics , Evidence-Based Medicine , Humans , Information Services/standards , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic/standards , Research Design/standards
11.
Nurse Res ; 12(2): 71-80, 2004 Oct 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27707415

ABSTRACT

In this paper, Patriek Mistiaen, Else Poot, Sophie Hickox, and Cordula Wagner describe how they conducted a search of the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews in order to explore the evidence for nursing interventions. They identify the number of studies, the number of participants, and the conclusions of systematic reviews concerning nursing interventions. They conclude that the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews is a valuable source of evidence about nursing interventions, and can be used as a means of developing a research agenda in the case of inconclusive reviews.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...