ABSTRACT
Introduction: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is an aggressive form of pancreatic malignancy which occurs in over 90% of such cases. Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is used with a curative purpose for localized PDAC. Case presentation: A 68-year-old woman presented to our service through a transfer from another service, to be investigated and treated for a head of the pancreas tumor in a tertiary referral hospital. After a complete clinical and paraclinical evaluation, the patient was diagnosed with a PDAC and also with a median arcuate ligament syndrome (MALS). The surgical treatment was considered adequate, therefore, the patient underwent a PD with transmesocolic hepaticojejunostomy, pancreaticogastric anastomosis, precolic end-to-side gastrojejunostomy, Witzel jejunostomy and with the help of the cardiovascular surgery team from the Heart Institute, Cluj- Napoca, an aortohepatic bypass using saphenous vein graft was performed. Conclusion: Bypass was essential because the blood flow in the proper hepatic artery was not restored after sectioning the median arcuate ligament and clamping the gastroduodenal artery. The patient had a favorable outcome. The particularity of the present case consists of the complete occlusion of the celiac trunk by MALS and the total vascularization of the supramesocolic organs due to the superior mesenteric artery through the gastroduodenal artery.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal , Median Arcuate Ligament Syndrome , Pancreatic Neoplasms , Aged , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/surgery , Constriction, Pathologic/surgery , Female , Humans , Median Arcuate Ligament Syndrome/complications , Median Arcuate Ligament Syndrome/diagnosis , Median Arcuate Ligament Syndrome/surgery , Pancreatic Neoplasms/complications , Pancreatic Neoplasms/surgery , Pancreaticoduodenectomy/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome , Pancreatic NeoplasmsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: A primary caregiver shares the illness experience of the patient and undertakes vital care work, alongside managing the patient's emotions, and is actively involved in care process without being paid. When faced with the palliative care patient's needs, caregivers are affected on multiple levels (physical, psychological and socio-economic), thereby experiencing a moderate or severe burden of care. AIM: To identify assessment instruments for the burden of care for family caregivers that are suitable to be used in clinical practice. METHOD: A narrative review was conducted using an electronic search in Pubmed, PsychINFO, CINAHL of articles published in English between 2009-2019, using the search terms: 'caregiver/family, caregiver/carer and burden and palliative care/hospice/end of life'. An assessment grid was developed to appraise the clinical use of identified instruments. RESULTS: Of the 568 articles identified, 40 quantitative studies were selected using 31 instruments to measure the caregiver burden of cancer, noncancer and terminally ill patients. Most instruments 23 (74.11%) evaluate the psycho-emotional and, 22 (70.96%) the social domain, 12 instruments (38.7%) focused on the physical domain, three (9.67%) on the spiritual field and six instruments (19.35%) on economic aspects. For the multidimensional instruments, the assessment grid scored highest for the Burden Scale for Family Caregiver (BSFC). CONCLUSION: The BSFC is the tool that seems to meet the most requirements, being potentially the most useful tool in clinical practice.
