Neoadjuvant botensilimab plus balstilimab response pattern in locally advanced mismatch repair proficient colorectal cancer.

In patients with locally advanced cancer without distant metastases, the neoadjuvant setting presents a platform to evaluate new drugs. For mismatch repair proficient/microsatellite stable (pMMR/MSS) colon and rectal cancer, immunotherapy has shown limited efficacy. Herein, we report exceptional responses observed with neoadjuvant botensilimab (BOT), an Fc-enhanced next-generation anti-CTLA-4 antibody, alongside balstilimab (BAL; an anti-PD-1 antibody) in two patients with pMMR/MSS colon and rectal cancer. The histological pattern of rapid immune response observed ("inside-out" (serosa-to-mucosa) tumor regression) has not been described previously in this setting. Spatial biology analyses (RareCyte Inc.) reveal mechanisms of actions of BOT, a novel innate-adaptive immune activator. These observations have downstream implications for clinical trial designs using neoadjuvant immunotherapy and potentially sparing patients chemotherapy.

A pilot study treatment of malignant tumors using low-dose 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG).

Photons, electrons and protons have therapeutic use however positrons have only been used for diagnostic imaging purposes. The energies of positrons (ß+) from F-18 (0.633 MeV) and electrons (ß-) from I-131 (0.606 MeV) are very close and have similar equilibrium dose constants. Since [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) clears rapidly from circulation, administration of 37-74 GBq (1-2 Ci) of 18F-FDG is relatively safe from an internal radiation dosimetry point of view. We initiated a phase I dose escalation study to assess the safety, toxicity, and potential therapeutic utility of administering 100-200 mCi/m2 18F-FDG delivered over a 1 to 5 day period in patients with advanced lymphomas and solid tumors refractory to standard of care treatment (SCT). Here we report the results of the first four patients treated. Four patients with advanced cancers received a single dose of 3.7-7.4 GBq/m2 (100-200 mCi/m2) 18F-FDG. We monitored the patients for adverse effects and for response. No treatment-related toxicities were observed. There was no increased radiation exposure to personnel. Two patients showed decrease in the index lesions' SUVs by 17-33% (Day 1) and 25-31% (Day 30) post treatment. The two other patients showed stable disease on 18F-PET-CT. Interestingly, responses were seen at low radiotherapy doses (below 1 Gy). This exploratory study demonstrated the safety of therapeutic administration of up to 14.2 GBq (385 mCi) 18F-FDG. In patients with 18F-FDG-avid cancers, targeted radionuclide 18F-FDG therapy appears safe and may offer clinical benefit.

Clinicopathological Features of Gastroesophageal Neuroendocrine Neoplasms.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Gastroesophageal neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are a rare entity. Recent 2019 WHO classifications reflect our understanding of tumor biology, namely, that distinct molecular characteristics underline tumor behavior and prognosis. Here, we reviewed the evidence for linking molecular findings with the clinicopathological features and treatment of gastroesophageal NENs. RECENT FINDINGS: Degree of differentiation and Ki-67 proliferation index are required for accurate classification of neuroendocrine tumors and carcinomas but not sufficient to distinguish between the two entities. Resection remains the mainstay treatment for early-stage gastroesophageal neuroendocrine tumors. Additional perioperative therapy may benefit mitotically active tumors. There is a role for somatostatin analogues, especially in the setting of metastatic and symptomatic disease. New radiolabeled somatostatin analogues, immunotherapy, and embolization offer multimodality treatments for distant metastases. We need to understand the specific underlying biology of the various subtypes of gastroesophageal NENs to provide tailored treatment.

A phase 2 study of dalantercept, an activin receptor-like kinase-1 ligand trap, in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

BACKGROUND: Patients with platinum-refractory, recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (RM-SCCHN) have limited options. Activin receptor-like kinase 1 (ALK1) is a type I receptor of the transforming growth factor ß superfamily expressed on activated endothelial cells. Dalantercept is an ALK1 receptor fusion protein that acts as a ligand trap to block signaling through ALK1 and inhibits stages of angiogenesis involved in blood vessel maturation and stabilization. In a phase 1 study, dalantercept demonstrated clinical activity in patients with RM-SCCHN. The objective of the current study was to evaluate the activity of dalantercept in RM-SCCHN. METHODS: Forty-six patients received dalantercept at doses of 80 mg (n = 2), 0.6 mg/kg (n = 13), or 1.2 mg/kg (n = 31) subcutaneously every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was the overall response rate according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST version 1.1). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival and overall survival, safety and tolerability, and pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic assessments. RESULTS: Forty patients were evaluable for response (13 who received dalantercept 0.6 mg/kg and 27 who received dalantercept 1.2 mg/kg). The overall response rate was 5% (n = 2), and 35% of patients had stable disease; 44% of patients who received 1.2 mg/kg and 30.8% of those who received 0.6 mg/kg achieved disease control (partial response or stable disease). The median progression-fee survival was 1.4 months (95% confidence interval, 1.3-2.2 months), and the median overall survival was 7.1 months (95% confidence interval, 5.5-11.1 months). Drug-related adverse events (>15%) were anemia, fatigue, peripheral edema, headache, and hyponatremia. CONCLUSIONS: In an unselected, heavily pretreated population of patients with RM-SCCHN, dalantercept monotherapy resulted in a favorable safety profile but only modest dose-dependent activity, and it did not meet the primary efficacy objective of the study. Cancer 2016;122:3641-9. © 2016 American Cancer Society.

Capecitabine in the treatment of esophageal and gastric cancers.

INTRODUCTION: Fluoropyrimidine therapy has been a mainstay in the treatment of cancers of the esophagus and stomach for nearly half of a century in the form of intravenous 5-fluorouracil. Capecitabine , an oral fluoropyrimidine precursor, was first approved in 2001 for the treatment of metastatic colon cancer and may be used interchangeably with parenteral 5-FU in the treatment of upper gastrointestinal (GI) cancers. AREAS COVERED: In this article, mechanisms of action and synergy with other systemic therapies and radiation are reviewed. A summary of the most important clinical trial results shaping the use of capecitabine in the treatment of cancers of the esophagus and stomach is offered, along with an update of upcoming areas of interest using this agent in these disease types. EXPERT OPINION: Improvements in understanding molecular mechanisms of disease, defining distinct disease subtypes based on histology, genetic background and levels of protein expression as well as signaling pathways may start to clarify the reasons underlying heterogeneous clinical behaviors and different outcomes between patients with seemingly similar tumor types. Capecitabine ushered in the era of oral chemotherapy, providing ease of administration with comparable if not superior efficacy to its older parental counterpart. The best way to fully exploit its potential in gastroesophageal cancers is being actively studied worldwide at all stages of disease management.

Met, IGF1R, and other new targets in upper GI malignancies.

OPINION STATEMENT: Upper gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies comprise some of the most aggressive human cancers. Expanding knowledge of molecular mechanisms is finally translating into clinical application, and this has occurred at a relatively rapid rate in the past several years. However, despite recent advances in targeted therapies in upper GI cancers our overall success with targeted therapeutics in this disease area remains dismal. This statement is particularly troubling given some sobering facts: upper GI malignancies are prevalent as well as aggressive with a high morbidity and mortality. Esophagus and gastric cancer combined have an annual global incidence of over 1.2 million new cases annually while median survival is less than 1 year for most patients with metastatic disease. Progress has been limited due to several factors including: disease heterogeneity and variance of phenotype across the globe, clinical trial design strategies that have not yet incorporated selective mechanisms to afford individualized matching of drug to tumor molecular profile and last, a lack of validated predictive markers. Nevertheless there is evidence that many targeted agents can be administered safely at doses that achieve the required effect at the protein level. Several drugs that have negative early trial results can be potentially vital therapeutic agents if patient selection is appropriate.

Phase II study of uracil-tegafur with leucovorin in elderly (> or = 75 years old) patients with colorectal cancer: ECOG 1299.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the tolerability and effectiveness of uracil-tegafur (UFT) with leucovorin (LV) in the treatment of elderly patients with advanced colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients > or = 75 years of age with previously untreated colorectal cancer were eligible for this phase II, single-arm, open-label, multicenter cooperative group clinical trial. UFT 100 mg/m2 plus LV 30 mg orally every 8 hours for 28 days every 35 days was administered until progression. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients were enrolled between June 2000 and July 2001, and 55 were treated. The median age of treated patients was 81 years (range, 75 to 90 years), 26 patients were (47%) women, and 80% had good performance status (0 to 1). The observed overall response rate was 22% (95% CI, 11.8% to 35.0%). The estimated median overall survival time was 13.0 months (95% CI, 9.6 to 17.4 months), and median progression-free survival time was 4.6 months (95% CI, 2.6 to 6.7 months). Among the 56 treated patients (including one ineligible patient), 31 (55%) experienced grade 3 to 4 toxicities, most commonly diarrhea (25%) and GI toxicity (36%), with patients older than 85 years of age at highest risk. CONCLUSION: The results of this trial support the efficacy of oral UFT/LV in elderly patients with colorectal cancer. The regimen is tolerated moderately well overall, particularly as compared with other fluoropyrimidine regimens, although there is increased GI toxicity in the most elderly. These results suggest that studies using newer oral fluoropyrimidine analogs should be investigated in this patient population.