Polyphosphate-loaded silk fibroin membrane as hemostatic agent in oral surgery: a pilot study.

PURPOSE: Post-interventional hemorrhage can result in serious complications, especially in patients with hemostatic disorders. Identification of safe and efficient local hemostatic agents is important, particularly in the context of an ageing society and the emergence of new oral anticoagulants. The aim of this in vitro study was to investigate the potential of silk fibroin membranes coated with the inorganic polymer polyphosphate (polyP) as a novel hemostatic device in oral surgery. METHODS: Cocoons of the silkworm Bombyx mori were degummed and dissolved. Varying amounts of long-chain polyP (2-2000 µg/mm2) were adsorbed to the surface of silk fibroin membranes. Analysis of the procoagulant effect of polyP-coated silk membranes was performed using real-time thrombin generation assays in human plasma. Increasing concentrations of polyP (0.15-500 µg/ml) served as a positive control, while uncoated silk fibroin membranes were used as negative control. RESULTS: PolyP-coated silk fibroin membranes triggered coagulation when compared to plasma samples and pure silk fibroin membranes. A polyP-dose-dependent effect of thrombin generation could be found with a maximum (ETP = 1525.7 nM⋅min, peak thrombin = 310.1 nM, time to peak = 9.8 min, lag time = 7.6 min.) at 200 µg/mm2 of polymer loading on the silk fibroin membrane surface. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, it was demonstrated that silk fibroin membranes coated with polyP have the potential to act as a promising novel hemostatic device.

Glidescope Video Laryngoscopy in Patients with Severely Restricted Mouth Opening-A Pilot Study.

BACKGROUND: An inter-incisor gap <3 cm is considered critical for videolaryngoscopy. It is unknown if new generation GlideScope Spectrum™ videolaryngoscopes with low-profile hyperangulated blades might facilitate safe tracheal intubation in these patients. This prospective pilot study aims to evaluate feasibility and safety of GlideScopeTM videolaryngoscopes in severely restricted mouth opening. METHODS: Feasibility study in 30 adults with inter-incisor gaps between 1.0 and 3.0 cm scheduled for ENT or maxillofacial surgery. Individuals at risk for aspiration or rapid desaturation were excluded. RESULTS: The mean mouth opening was 2.2 ± 0.5 cm (range 1.1-3.0 cm). First attempt success rate was 90% and overall success was 100%. A glottis view grade 1 or 2a was achieved in all patients. Nasotracheal intubation was particularly difficult if Magill forceps were required (n = 4). Intubation time differed between orotracheal (n = 9; 33 (25; 39) s) and nasotracheal (n = 21; 55 (38; 94) s); p = 0.049 intubations. The airway operator's subjective ratings on visual analogue scales (0-100) revealed that tube placement was more difficult in individuals with an inter-incisor gap <2.0 cm (n = 10; 35 (29; 54)) versus ≥2.0 cm (n = 20; 20 (10; 30)), p = 0.007, while quality of glottis exposure did not differ. CONCLUSIONS: GlidescopeTM videolaryngoscopy is feasible and safe in patients with severely restricted mouth opening if given limitations are respected.

Elective Tracheal Intubation With the VieScope-A Prospective Randomized Non-inferiority Pilot Study (VieScOP-Trial).

Background: Tracheal intubation is commonly performed after direct laryngoscopy using Macintosh laryngoscopes (MacL), but visualization of the larynx may be inadequate. The VieScope (VSC) as a new type of laryngoscope consisting of a straight, shielded, illuminated tube used to perform intubation via a bougie was investigated in this prospective randomized trial in patients without expected difficult airways. Methods: With ethics approval, 2 × 29 patients for elective surgery were randomized 1:1 to intubation with VSC or MacL. Endpoints were first attempt success rates (FAS), Percentage of Glottis Opening Scale (POGO), time to intubation (TTI), and difficulty ratings on visual analog scales (0-100, lower values better). Data are given as mean ± standard deviation. Results: The FAS was 83 ± 38% for VSC and 86 ± 34% for MacL (P = 0.723). For VSC, POGO was 86 ± 17% and for MacL 68 ± 30% (P = 0.007). TTI for VSC was 93 ± 67s vs. 38 ± 17 for MacL (P < 0.001). Difficulty of intubation was rated 23 ± 22 for VSC vs. 18 ± 22 for MacL (P = 0.422), viewing conditions 12 ± 15 vs. 24 ± 25 (P = 0.031), and difficulty of tube placement was rated 27 ± 30 vs. 7 ± 8 (P = 0.001). Conclusion: No difference in FAS was detected between VSC and MacL. Visualization of the larynx was superior using the VSC, while TTI was prolonged and tube placement via bougie was more challenging. The VSC could be an alternative to MacL in patients with difficult laryngoscopy, but this should be investigated further in patients with expected difficult airways.