Sequential hemibody irradiation integrated into a chemotherapy-local radiotherapy program for limited disease small cell lung cancer.

Twenty-four patients with limited disease small cell lung cancer (SCLC) were treated with sequential hemibody irradiation (SHB) integrated into a conventional chemotherapy-local radiotherapy (LRT) program. Among 23 evaluable patients, 12 (52%) attained a complete response (CR) and 8 (35%) attained a partial response for an overall major response rate of 87%. The median time since study entry is 29 months. Durations of response are 9.9 months for all patients and 16.5 months for patients who achieved a CR. The primary site was the predominant area of recurrence. The median survival is 13.2 months for all patients and 23.2 months for the 12 patients who attained a CR. Myelosuppression, especially thrombocytopenia, was the major toxicity. Acute radiation toxicities and subacute pneumonitis previously associated with hemibody radiotherapy were well controlled or prevented using the current dose, premedication, and shielding techniques. This integrated program of systemic therapies with SHB and combination chemotherapy plus LRT is feasible for limited disease SCLC; it may prolong survival in patients who attain a CR but compared to similar programs without hemibody irradiation, there was no improvement in overall response rate, response duration, or survival.

Clinical trial of folinic acid to reduce vincristine neurotoxicity.

In a murine model system, folinic acid demonstrated host-protective properties during administration of repetitive and lethal doses of vincristine (VCR). Subsequently, folinic acid was evaluated in patients receiving VCR during an adjuvant chemotherapy program for stage II carcinoma of the breast. The toxicities, cumulative VCR dosage, and percentage of ideal dosage observed in 18 patients receiving folinic acid have been compared with those observed in 70 patients who previously received VCR without folinic acid in the same chemotherapy program. All patients ideally were intended to receive VCR 1.0 mg/m2 weekly for 6 weeks, with dose modification for neurotoxicity. Treatment patients received folinic acid 800 mg PO daily in three divided doses during the 6-week course. The degree of neurotoxic manifestations of VCR was similar in the treatment and comparison patients. Absent to mild neurotoxicity was observed in approximately 70% of patients in both groups; moderate or greater neurotoxicity occurred in about 30% of patients in both groups. Full dosage (6.0 mg/m2) was attained in 7 (39%) treatment patients and 17 (24%) comparison patients (P = 0.21). The mean percentage of the ideal dosage of VCR was 73.7 +/- 28.7 in patients receiving folinic acid and 76.1 +/- 20.5 in those given only VCR (P = 0.69). Hematologic toxicities were similar in both groups, but nausea occurred more frequently in the folinic acid group. Folinic acid in this dose and schedule afforded no protection from the neurotoxic side effects of VCR.

Clinical trial of pyridoxine to reduce vincristine neurotoxicity.

In a murine model system, pyridoxine has demonstrated protective properties during administration of lethal doses of vincristine (VCR). Subsequently, pyridoxine has been evaluated in patients receiving VCR during an adjuvant chemotherapy program for stage II carcinoma of the breast. The toxicities, cumulative VCR dosage, and percentage of ideal dosage observed in 24 patients receiving pyridoxine have been compared to those observed in 88 patients who previously received VCR without pyridoxine in the same chemotherapy program. All patients ideally were to receive VCR 1.0 mg/m2 weekly for 6-weeks with dose modification for neurotoxicity. Treatment patients received pyridoxine 1.5 grams p.o. daily in three divided doses during the 6-week course. The degree of neurotoxic manifestations of VCR was similar in the treatment and comparison patients. Absent to mild neurotoxicity was observed in approximately 70% of patients in both groups; moderate or greater neurotoxicity occurred in about 30% of patients in both groups. Full dosage (6.0 mg/m2) was attained in 8 (33%) treatment patients and 18 (24%) comparison patients (p = 0.28). The mean percentage of ideal dosage of VCR was 84.6 +/- 10.8 in patients receiving pyridoxine and 81.9 +/- 21.6 in those given only VCR (p = 0.59). Gastrointestinal and hematologic toxicities were similar in both groups. Pyridoxine in this dose and schedule afforded no protection from the neurotoxic side effects of VCR.

Single agent vincristine by infusion in refractory multiple myeloma.

A phase 2 trial of vincristine infusion was conducted in a group of 21 patients with refractory multiple myeloma. Patients were generally heavily pretreated with radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Vincristine was given intravenously (IV) as a 0.5 mg bolus and followed immediately by infusion of 0.25 to 0.50 mg/m2/d for 5 days. Courses were repeated every 3 weeks in the absence of disease progression or prohibitive toxicity. Objective responses (partial) were noted in two patients (10%), both of whom were administered 0.5 mg/m2/d infusions. Response durations were brief (2.2 and 1.2 months). Toxicity consisted of neurotoxicity and myelosuppression. In addition to the occurrence of paresthesias and myalgias, ileus (two cases) and moderately severe loss of motor function (two cases) were observed. The mean lowest WBC count following treatment was 2.67 X 10(3)/microL v 3.96 X 10(3)/microL pretreatment (P = .008). The mean lowest platelet count was 75.0 X 10(3)/microL v 106.8 X 10(3)/microL pretreatment (P = .008). Vincristine infusion appears to have limited activity in the treatment of refractory multiple myeloma. Additionally, response durations were short lived and toxicity, both neurologic and hematologic, was appreciable.

Phase II study of vincristine infusion in refractory small cell carcinoma of the lung.

Fifteen patients with extensive refractory small cell carcinoma of the lung received prolonged intravenous infusion of vincristine. All but one patient had previously been given vincristine by conventional bolus injection. Treatment consisted of a 0.5-mg bolus injection followed immediately by 0.25 mg/m2/day infusion which was continued for 5 days. Toxicity in general was minimal, but rapidly progressive disease precluded adequate assessment in the majority of patients. No objective responses were observed. Infusion of vincristine does not appear to be an efficacious salvage treatment for this disease.

Prospective evaluation of changes in computed cranial tomography in patients with small cell lung carcinoma treated with chemotherapy and prophylactic cranial irradiation.

Computed cranial tomographic scans were performed as part of the pretreatment evaluation and at six- to nine-month intervals posttreatment in 13 patients with small cell lung carcinoma. All patients received 3,000 rad of prophylactic cranial irradiation delivered over two weeks in ten treatment fractions in conjunction with multiagent chemotherapy. Posttreatment scans documented an extraordinarily high frequency of abnormalities including cerebral atrophy (100%), ventricular dilatation (70%), and decreased coefficient of absorption in the white matter (15%). Unexplained neurologic abnormalities developed in four of six patients living at least 15 months after institution of therapy. As the number of long-term survivors of this type of lung cancer increases, the need for prospective comprehensive neuropsychologic assessment to determine the clinical significance of these changes is needed.

Improved tolerance of vincristine by glutamic acid. A preliminary report.

In a murine model system, glutamic acid has demonstrated host protective properties during administration of vincristine (VCR). Subsequently, glutamic acid has been evaluated in patients receiving VCR during adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II carcinoma of the breast. The cumulative VCR dosage and toxicities incurred in 16 patients receiving glutamic acid have been compared to those observed in 88 patients who previously received VCR without glutamic acid in the same chemotherapy program. All patients received VCR 1.0 mg/m2 weekly for 6 weeks with dose modification for neurotoxicity. Treatment patients received glutamic acid 1.5 grams p.o. daily in three divided doses during the induction course. Of the 16 treatment patients, 9 (56%) received 100% ideal dosage of VCR during induction therapy whereas only 24 of 88 (27%) comparison patients attained this dosage level (p less than .025). Gastrointestinal and hematologic toxicities were similar in both groups. These preliminary results suggest the need for an expanded trial of this agent during administration of VCR.

Lack of potentiation of vincristine-induced neurotoxicity by VP-16-213.

Due to a recent alarming report suggesting that the severe neurotoxicity observed following treatment with a multiagent chemotherapy regimen might be due to the interaction of vincristine and VP-16-213, the neurologic toxicity data from a randomized trial conducted by the Bowman Gray School of Medicine and the Piedmont Oncology Association in small cell carcinoma of the lung have been analyzed. Of 102 patients evaluable for toxicity, 50 were treated with a combination of cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, and vincristine (CAV) and 52 received this regimen plus VP-16-213. Vincristine dosage was the same in both arms of the study. When analyzed by severity, neurologic complications were similar in both treatment groups: Grade 1-2 neurotoxicity occurred in 55% of patients on both arms and grade 3-4 neurotoxicity was observed in six (12%) patients on the CAV arm and four (8%) on the CAV-VP-16-213 arm. Addition of VP-16-213 to vincristine did not potentiate vincristine-induced neurotoxicity when administered in this dose-schedule relationship.