Asymmetric Centriole Numbers at Spindle Poles Cause Chromosome Missegregation in Cancer.

Chromosomal instability is a hallmark of cancer and correlates with the presence of extra centrosomes, which originate from centriole overduplication. Overduplicated centrioles lead to the formation of centriole rosettes, which mature into supernumerary centrosomes in the subsequent cell cycle. While extra centrosomes promote chromosome missegregation by clustering into pseudo-bipolar spindles, the contribution of centriole rosettes to chromosome missegregation is unknown. We used multi-modal imaging of cells with conditional centriole overduplication to show that mitotic rosettes in bipolar spindles frequently harbor unequal centriole numbers, leading to biased chromosome capture that favors binding to the prominent pole. This results in chromosome missegregation and aneuploidy. Rosette mitoses lead to viable offspring and significantly contribute to progeny production. We further show that centrosome abnormalities in primary human malignancies frequently consist of centriole rosettes. As asymmetric centriole rosettes generate mitotic errors that can be propagated, rosette mitoses are sufficient to cause chromosome missegregation in cancer.

A novel splice donor site at nt 1534 is required for long-term maintenance of HPV31 genomes.

Human papillomaviruses (HPV) are small double-stranded DNA viruses that replicate as low copy number nuclear plasmids during the persistent phase. HPV only possess nine open reading frames but extend their coding capabilities by alternative RNA splicing. We have identified in cell lines with replicating HPV31 genomes viral transcripts that connect the novel splice donor (SD) sites at nt 1426 and 1534 within the E1 replication gene to known splice acceptors at nt 3295 or 3332 within the E2/E4 region. These transcripts are polyadenylated and are present at low amounts in the non-productive and productive phase of the viral life cycle. Mutation of the novel splice sites in the context of HPV31 genomes revealed that the inactivation of SD1534 had only minor effects in short-term replication assays but displayed a low copy number phenotype in long-term cultures which might be due to the expression of alternative E1;E4 or yet unknown viral proteins. This suggests a regulatory role for minor splice sites within E1 for papillomavirus replication.

Comparative analysis of 19 genital human papillomavirus types with regard to p53 degradation, immortalization, phylogeny, and epidemiologic risk classification.

We have analyzed E6 proteins of 19 papillomaviruses able to infect genital tissue with regard to their ability to degrade p53 and the thus far unknown immortalization potential of the genomes of human papillomaviruses (HPV) 53, 56, 58, 61, 66, and 82 in primary human keratinocytes. E6 proteins of HPV types 16, 18, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58, and 66, defined as high-risk types, were able to induce p53 degradation in vitro, and HPV18-, HPV56-, and HPV58-immortalized keratinocytes revealed markedly reduced levels of p53. In contrast, the E6 proteins of HPV6 and 11 and HPV44, 54, and 61, regarded as possible carcinogenic or low-risk HPV types, respectively, did not degrade p53. Interestingly, the E6 proteins of HPV 53, 70, and 82 inconsistently risk classified in the literature were also found to induce p53 degradation. The genomes of HPV53 and 82 immortalized primary human keratinocytes that revealed almost absent nuclear levels of p53. These data suggest a strict correlation between the biological properties of certain HPV types with conserved nucleotide sequence (phylogeny), which is largely coherent with epidemiologic risk classification. HPV types 16, 18, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58, and 66, generally accepted as high-risk types, behaved in our assays biologically different from HPV types 6, 11, 44, 54, and 61. In contrast, HPV70, regarded as low-risk type, and HPV53 or HPV82, with inconsistent described risk status, were indistinguishable with respect to p53 degradation and immortalization from prototype high-risk HPV types. This could imply that other important functional differences exist between phylogenetically highly related viruses displaying similar biological properties in tissue culture that may affect their carcinogenicity in vivo.

Gene expression profiles reveal an upregulation of E2F and downregulation of interferon targets by HPV18 but no changes between keratinocytes with integrated or episomal viral genomes.

Persistent infections with human papillomaviruses type 18 can result in the development of cervical cancer. HPV18 genomes persist extrachromosomally in low-grade and precancerous lesions but are always integrated in cervical cancers, and this might contribute to the progression of HPV18-induced lesions. To address whether integration induces additional changes in host cells, several keratinocyte lines with wild type and replication-deficient E1 mutant HPV18 (E1C-TTL) genomes were analyzed with high density oligonucleotide arrays. In comparison to normal keratinocytes, wild type and integrated E1C-TTL HPV18 genomes deregulate the expression of 280 annotated genes. However, the comparison of wild type with E1C-TTL cell lines did not reveal any significant differences, indicating that neither the loss of E1 nor viral integration induces additional gene expression changes in low passage HPV18-positive keratinocytes. Half of the deregulated genes have been described as targets of the p16/Rb/E2F, p53, interferon or NFkappaB pathways consistent with the functions ascribed to the viral E6 and E7 oncoproteins, but the other half can currently not be ascribed to certain pathways.