ABSTRACT
Prevalent molecular alterations of the phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) pathway are found on solid tumors and are expressed in leukocytes, making it a desirable target in both solid and hematologic malignancies. In recent years, two agents targeting this pathway have been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration, idelalisib and copanlisib, with many others under investigation. Due to the off-target effects seen with these agents, those under development have varying isoform specificity that mitigates toxicity. In this review, we attempt to illustrate the varying differences among these agents, both mechanistically as well as highlight differences in their respective adverse effect profiles.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Phosphoinositide-3 Kinase Inhibitors , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacology , Drug Development/methods , Drugs, Investigational/administration & dosage , Drugs, Investigational/adverse effects , Drugs, Investigational/pharmacology , Enzyme Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Enzyme Inhibitors/adverse effects , Enzyme Inhibitors/pharmacology , Hematologic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Hematologic Neoplasms/enzymology , Hematologic Neoplasms/pathology , Humans , Molecular Targeted Therapy , Neoplasms/enzymology , Neoplasms/pathology , Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase/metabolismABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Results of a prospective study comparing clinical outcomes and costs of levalbuterol versus albuterol therapy for exacerbations of asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are presented. METHODS: In a single-center open-label study, selected adults hospitalized for asthma or COPD exacerbations over a 21-month period were randomly assigned to receive levalbuterol 1.25 mg three times daily (n = 55) or albuterol 2.5 mg four times daily (n = 57); dosage reductions and other respiratory therapies were permitted. Study outcomes included scheduled and rescue nebulizations, total treatment costs, hospital length of stay, and change in heart rate from baseline. RESULTS: The numbers of scheduled nebulizations were similar in the levalbuterol and albuterol groups (mean ± S.D., 19.6 ± 13.4 versus 20.7 ± 14.4; p = 0.692), as were the numbers of rescue nebulizations (mean ± S.D., 0.7 ± 1.4 versus 0.8 ± 2.0; p = 0.849). The mean change from baseline in heart rate did not differ significantly between groups. Mean total treatment costs per patient were significantly greater with the use of levalbuterol ($8003, bootstrap 95% confidence interval [CI], $6628-$9379) versus albuterol ($5772, bootstrap 95% CI, $5051-$6494; p = 0.006). Hospital length of stay was significantly greater in the levalbuterol group (mean ± S.D., 8.5 ± 5.2 days versus 6.8 ± 3.6 days with albuterol use; p = 0.040). CONCLUSION: Clinical outcomes were similar with the use of levalbuterol versus albuterol for exacerbations of COPD or asthma. On average, patients receiving levalbuterol had longer and more costly hospital stays.
