Indicators of correct targeting in stereotactic biopsy of intracranial lesions.

Background: Confirmation of whether a stereotactic biopsy was performed in the correct site is usually dependent on the frozen section or on novel tumor-specific markers that are not widely available. Immediate postoperative computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance (MR) is routinely performed in our service after biopsy. In this retrospective study, we have carefully analyzed these images in an attempt to determine the presence of markers that indicate appropriate targeting. Methods: Medical records and neuroimages of patients who underwent stereotactic biopsy of intracranial lesions were reviewed. The following variables were assessed: age, sex, anatomopathology, lesion site, complications, diagnostic accuracy, and the presence of image markers. Results: Twenty-nine patients were included in this case series. About 96.6% of the biopsies were accurate according to the permanent section. Of the 86.2% of patients with intralesional pneumocephalus on the postoperative images, 51.7% additionally presented petechial hemorrhage. In 13.8% of the cases, no image markers were identified. Conclusion: This is the first report of intralesional pneumocephalus and petechial hemorrhage as indicators of appropriate targeting in stereotactic biopsy. In the majority of the cases, an immediate postoperative head CT, which is widely available, can estimate how adequate the targeting is. To use intralesional pneumocephalus/ petechial hemorrhages as not only postoperative but also as intraoperative markers of appropriate targeting, it is advised that the surgical wound should be temporarily closed and dressed after the biopsy so that the patient can undergo a CT/MR scan and be checked for the presence of theses markers before removing the stereotactic frame.

Similar Microglial Cell Densities across Brain Structures and Mammalian Species: Implications for Brain Tissue Function.

Microglial cells play essential volume-related actions in the brain that contribute to the maturation and plasticity of neural circuits that ultimately shape behavior. Microglia can thus be expected to have similar cell sizes and even distribution both across brain structures and across species with different brain sizes. To test this hypothesis, we determined microglial cell densities (the inverse of cell size) using immunocytochemistry to Iba1 in samples of free cell nuclei prepared with the isotropic fractionator from brain structures of 33 mammalian species belonging to males and females of five different clades. We found that microglial cells constitute ∼7% of non-neuronal cells in different brain structures as well as in the whole brain of all mammalian species examined. Further, they vary little in cell density compared with neuronal cell densities within the cerebral cortex, across brain structures, across species within the same clade, and across mammalian clades. As a consequence, we find that one microglial cell services as few as one and as many as 100 neurons in different brain regions and species, depending on the local neuronal density. We thus conclude that the addition of microglial cells to mammalian brains is governed by mechanisms that constrain the size of these cells and have remained conserved over 200 million years of mammalian evolution. We discuss the probable consequences of such constrained size for brain function in health and disease.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Microglial cells are resident macrophages of the CNS, with key functions in recycling synapses and maintaining the local environment in health and disease. We find that microglial cells occur in similar densities in the brains of different species and in the different structures of each individual brain, which indicates that these cells maintain a similar average size in mammalian evolution, suggesting in turn that the volume monitored by each microglial cell remains constant across mammals. Because the density of neurons is highly variable across the same brain structures and species, our finding implies that microglia-dependent functional recovery may be particularly difficult in those brain structures and species with high neuronal densities and therefore fewer microglial cells per neuron.

Cellular Scaling Rules for the Brains of Marsupials: Not as "Primitive" as Expected.

In the effort to understand the evolution of mammalian brains, we have found that common relationships between brain structure mass and numbers of nonneuronal (glial and vascular) cells apply across eutherian mammals, but brain structure mass scales differently with numbers of neurons across structures and across primate and nonprimate clades. This suggests that the ancestral scaling rules for mammalian brains are those shared by extant nonprimate eutherians - but do these scaling relationships apply to marsupials, a sister group to eutherians that diverged early in mammalian evolution? Here we examine the cellular composition of the brains of 10 species of marsupials. We show that brain structure mass scales with numbers of nonneuronal cells, and numbers of cerebellar neurons scale with numbers of cerebral cortical neurons, comparable to what we have found in eutherians. These shared scaling relationships are therefore indicative of mechanisms that have been conserved since the first therians. In contrast, while marsupials share with nonprimate eutherians the scaling of cerebral cortex mass with number of neurons, their cerebella have more neurons than nonprimate eutherian cerebella of a similar mass, and their rest of brain has fewer neurons than eutherian structures of a similar mass. Moreover, Australasian marsupials exhibit ratios of neurons in the cerebral cortex and cerebellum over the rest of the brain, comparable to artiodactyls and primates. Our results suggest that Australasian marsupials have diverged from the ancestral Theria neuronal scaling rules, and support the suggestion that the scaling of average neuronal cell size with increasing numbers of neurons varies in evolution independently of the allocation of neurons across structures.

The elephant brain in numbers.

What explains the superior cognitive abilities of the human brain compared to other, larger brains? Here we investigate the possibility that the human brain has a larger number of neurons than even larger brains by determining the cellular composition of the brain of the African elephant. We find that the African elephant brain, which is about three times larger than the human brain, contains 257 billion (10(9)) neurons, three times more than the average human brain; however, 97.5% of the neurons in the elephant brain (251 billion) are found in the cerebellum. This makes the elephant an outlier in regard to the number of cerebellar neurons compared to other mammals, which might be related to sensorimotor specializations. In contrast, the elephant cerebral cortex, which has twice the mass of the human cerebral cortex, holds only 5.6 billion neurons, about one third of the number of neurons found in the human cerebral cortex. This finding supports the hypothesis that the larger absolute number of neurons in the human cerebral cortex (but not in the whole brain) is correlated with the superior cognitive abilities of humans compared to elephants and other large-brained mammals.