ABSTRACT
Background: The 2009 Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation is the most used equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate (GFR), with race being a factor thereof, increasing GFR by 16% in self-identified Black persons compared with non-Black persons. However, recent publications indicate that it might overestimate GFR for Black adults outside the USA. In this meta-analysis, we assessed the accuracy, evaluated by the percentage of estimated GFR within 30% of measured GFR (P30), of the 2009 CKD-EPI equation in estimating GFR with and without the race coefficient in Black individuals outside the United States of America (USA). Methods: We searched MEDLINE and Embase from inception to 9 July 2022, with no language restriction, supplemented by manual reference searches. Studies that assessed the CKD-EPI P30 accuracy with or without the race coefficient in Black adults outside the USA with an adequate method of GFR measurement were included. Data were extracted by independent pairs of reviewers and were pooled using a random-effects model. Results: We included 11 studies, with a total of 1834 Black adults from South America, Africa and Europe. The race coefficient in the 2009 CKD-EPI equation significantly decreased P30 accuracy {61.9% [95% confidence interval (CI) 53-70%] versus 72.9% [95% CI 66.7-78.3%]; P = .03}. Conclusions: Outside the USA, the 2009 CKD-EPI equation should not be used with the race coefficient, even though the 2009 CKD-EPI equation is not sufficiently accurate either way (<75%). Thus we endorse the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes guidelines to use exogenous filtration markers when this may impact clinical conduct.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) equations accuracy has been questioned in diabetes mellitus (DM). We aimed to evaluate the performance of three equations - European Kidney Function Consortium (EKFC), Full Age Spectrum (FAS), and 2021 Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) - in healthy and type 2 DM participants. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This cross-sectional studycompared eGFR equations withareference method: measured GFR (mGFR) by 51Cr-EDTA. The equations performance was assessed usingBland-Altman plot,concordance correlation coefficient (CCC), bias,P30 andP15 accuracy. RESULTS: In the 100 healthy adults included (aged 39 ± 15 years, 67% women, mean mGFR 107 ± 15, 2021 CKD-EPI 109 ± 14, FAS 107 ± 18 and EKFC 101 ± 12 mL/min/1.73 m2), all equations reached P30 accuracy above the desirable benchmark of 90%. In the 122 patients with type 2 DM (aged 61 ± 10 years, 55% women, mGFR97 ± 22, 2021 CKD-EPI 86 ± 20, FAS 83 ± 25 and EKFC 79 ± 18 mL/min/1.73 m2), the equations presented larger biases, worst agreement with mGFR and inferior accuracy, with 2021 CKD-EPI (83%) and EKFC (82%) presenting greater P30 than FAS (77%). CONCLUSION: In healthy Brazilian adults, 2021 CKD-EPI, FAS and EKFC are suitable to estimate GFR. However, all equations underperform in people with type 2 DM.
