Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
1.
Infect Immun ; 90(3): e0058621, 2022 03 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35099275

ABSTRACT

The mechanisms through which oral commensal bacteria mitigates uncontrolled inflammatory responses of the oral mucosa remain unknown. Here, we show that representative oral bacterial species normally associated with oral health [S. gordonii (Sg), V. parvula (Vp), A. naeslundii (An), C. sputigena (Cs), and N. mucosa (Nm)] enhanced differential chemokine responses in oral epithelial cells (OECs), with some bacteria (An, Vp, and Nm) inducing higher chemokine levels (CXCL1, CXCL8) than others (Sg, Cs). Although all bacterial species (except Cs) increased CCL20 mRNA levels consistent with protein elevations in cell lysates, only An, Vp, and Nm induced higher CCL20 secretion, similar to the effect of the oral pathogen F. nucleatum (Fn). In contrast, most CCL20 remained associated with OECs exposed to Sg and negligible amounts released into the cell supernatants. Consistently, Sg attenuated An-induced CCL20. MiR-4516 and miR-663a were identified as Sg-specifically induced miRNAs modulating validated targets of chemokine-associated pathways. Cell transfection with miR-4516 and miR-663a decreased An- and Fn-induced CCL20. MiRNA upregulation and attenuation of An-induced CCL20 by Sg were reversed by catalase. Up-regulation of both miRNAs was specifically enhanced by oral streptococci H2O2-producers. These findings suggest that CCL20 levels produced by OECs in response to bacterial challenge are regulated by Sg-induced miR-4516 and miR-663a in a mechanism that involves hydrogen peroxide. This type of molecular mechanism could partly explain the central role of specific oral streptococcal species in balancing inflammatory and antimicrobial responses given the critical role of CCL20 in innate (antimicrobial) and adaptive immunity (modulates Th17 responses).


Subject(s)
MicroRNAs , Streptococcus gordonii , Bacteria/genetics , Chemokine CCL20/genetics , Chemokine CCL20/metabolism , Epithelial Cells/microbiology , Humans , Hydrogen Peroxide/metabolism , Hydrogen Peroxide/pharmacology , MicroRNAs/genetics , MicroRNAs/metabolism , Mouth Mucosa
2.
Curr Urol Rep ; 22(12): 62, 2021 Dec 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34913107

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The aim of this review is to provide an overview of epidemiology, risk factors, and treatment of urological malignancies in renal transplant recipients (RTR). RECENT FINDINGS: Although optimal immunosuppressive therapy and cancer management in these patients remain controversial, adherence to general guidelines is recommended. Kidney transplantation is recognized as the standard of care for the treatment of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) as it offers prolonged survival and better quality of life. In the last decades, survival of RTRs has increased as a result of improved immunosuppressive therapy; nonetheless, the risk of developing cancer is higher among RTRs compared to the general population. Urological malignancies are the second most common after hematological cancer and often have more aggressive behavior and poor prognosis.


Subject(s)
Kidney Failure, Chronic , Kidney Transplantation , Urologic Neoplasms , Humans , Kidney Failure, Chronic/epidemiology , Kidney Failure, Chronic/etiology , Kidney Failure, Chronic/surgery , Kidney Transplantation/adverse effects , Quality of Life , Transplant Recipients , Urologic Neoplasms/epidemiology , Urologic Neoplasms/therapy
3.
Insects ; 12(12)2021 Dec 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34940203

ABSTRACT

The olive moth (OM), Prays oleae (Bern.) (Lepidoptera: Yponomeutidae), is a major olive grove pest worldwide; however, until now, very few studies have investigated the effectiveness of mating disruption (MD) techniques against this pest. Experiments were carried out for two successive years (2019 and 2020) in three different olive groves in Andalucía (Southern Spain) to evaluate mating disruption's efficacy in controlling the OM from the first to the third generation. The effectiveness of MD formulations against the three generations of OM was assessed by determining the percentage of infested olive fruits, the reduction of pheromone trap catches, and the number of affected inflorescences in both MD-treated and untreated control olive groves. The number of release points (one or two aerosol devices per ha) was also evaluated. In all years and trials, the mean number of males caught in traps placed in the MD-treated plots was significantly lower than untreated sites. Mating disruption registered a high suppression of male captures (>75%) in treated plots for two consecutive seasons. Concerning infested olive fruits, substantial reductions (about 80%) were observed in the MD plots of locations B and C, and a reduction of about 40% was detected in location A, compared to the control plot. Results showed that the installation of two aerosol devices/ha reduced fruit damage below 20% of infested olive fruits except for one site where a reduction of about 71% in the MD plot was recorded in 2019. Although few significant differences were associated with OM male catches and infested olive fruits between plots treated with one aerosol/ha and two aerosols/ha in most of the comparisons, significant differences in the number of olive inflorescences infested by P. oleae were found, suggesting a similar performance between the two tested aerosol densities. Results of two-year field trials in Andalucía demonstrated the potential of Mister P X841 aerosol devices as an effective tool for controlling the olive moth, P. oleae.

4.
World J Urol ; 39(6): 1997-2003, 2021 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32860535

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To determine how members of the Société Internationale d'Urologie (SIU) are continuing their education in the time of COVID-19. METHODS: A survey was disseminated amongst SIU members worldwide by email. Results were analyzed to examine the influence of age, practice region and settings on continuing medical education (CME) of the respondents. RESULTS: In total, 2494 respondents completed the survey. Internet searching was the most common method of CME (76%; all ps < 0.001), followed by searching journals and textbook including the online versions (62%; all ps < 0.001). Overall, 6% of the respondents reported no time/interest for CME during the pandemic. Although most urologists report using only one platform for their CME (26.6%), the majority reported using ≥ 2 platforms, with approximately 10% of the respondents using up to 5 different platforms. Urologists < 40 years old were more likely to use online literature (69%), podcasts/AV media (38%), online CME courses/webinars (40%), and social media (39%). There were regional variations in the CME modality used but no significant difference in the number of methods by region. There was no significant difference in responses between urologists in academic/public hospitals or private practice. CONCLUSION: During COVID-19, urologists have used web-based learning for their CME. Internet learning and literature were the top frequently cited learning methods. Younger urologists are more likely to use all forms of digital learning methods, while older urologists prefer fewer methods.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Education, Distance/methods , Education, Medical, Continuing , Teaching/trends , Urologists , Urology/education , Age Factors , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Communicable Disease Control/methods , Education, Medical, Continuing/methods , Education, Medical, Continuing/organization & administration , Education, Medical, Continuing/trends , Humans , Internationality , Internet Use/statistics & numerical data , SARS-CoV-2 , Social Media , Surveys and Questionnaires , Urologists/education , Urologists/statistics & numerical data
5.
Int Braz J Urol ; 46(suppl.1): 156-164, 2020 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32618462

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To explore the current situation faced by Latin American urology departments during the COVID-19 Outbreak in terms of knowledge, actions, prioritization of urology practices, and implementation of internal clinical management protocols for inpatients and outpatients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A non-validated, structured, self-administered, electronic survey with 35 closed multiple choice questions was conducted in Spanish, Portuguese, Italian, and English and Deutsch versions from April 1st to April 30th, 2020. The survey was distributed through social networks and the official American Confederation of Urology (CAU) website. It was anonymous, mainly addressed to Latin American urologists and urology residents. It included 35 questions exploring different aspects: 1) Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) and internal management protocols for healthcare providers; 2) Priority surgeries and urological urgencies and 3) Inpatient and outpatient care. RESULTS: Of 864 surveys received, 846 had at least 70% valid responses and were included in the statistical analyses. Surveys corresponded to South America in 62% of the cases, Central America and North America in 29.7%. 12.7% were residents. Regarding to PPE and internal management protocols, 88% confirmed the implementation of specific protocols and 45.4% have not received training to perform a safe clinical practice; only 2.3% reported being infected with COVID-19. 60.9% attended urgent surgeries. The following major uro-oncologic surgeries were reported as high priority: Radical Nephrectomy (RN) 58.4%, and Radical Cystectomy (RC) 57.3%. When we associate the capacity of hospitalization (urologic beds available) and percentage of high-priority surgery performed, we observed that centers with fewer urological beds (10-20) compared to centers with more urological beds (31-40) performed more frequently major urologic cancer surgeries: RN 54.5% vs 60.8% (p=0.0003), RC 53.1% vs 64.9% (p=0.005) respectively. CONCLUSIONS: At the time of writing (May 13th 2020) our data represents a snapshot of COVID-19 outbreak in Latin American urological practices. Our findings have practical implications and should be contextualized considering many factors related to patients and urological care: The variability of health care scenarios, institutional capacity, heterogeneity and burden of urologic disease, impact of surgical indications and decision making when prioritizing and scheduling surgeries in times of COVID-19 pandemic.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Urology/trends , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Hospitals/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Latin America , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , Surveys and Questionnaires , Urologic Surgical Procedures/statistics & numerical data
6.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 46(supl.1): 156-164, July 2020. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1134280

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT Purpose: To explore the current situation faced by Latin American urology departments during the COVID-19 Outbreak in terms of knowledge, actions, prioritization of urology practices, and implementation of internal clinical management protocols for inpatients and outpatients. Material and Methods: A non-validated, structured, self-administered, electronic survey with 35 closed multiple choice questions was conducted in Spanish, Portuguese, Italian, and English and Deutsch versions from April 1st to April 30th, 2020. The survey was distributed through social networks and the official American Confederation of Urology (CAU) website. It was anonymous, mainly addressed to Latin American urologists and urology residents. It included 35 questions exploring different aspects: 1) Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) and internal management protocols for healthcare providers; 2) Priority surgeries and urological urgencies and 3) Inpatient and outpatient care. Results: Of 864 surveys received, 846 had at least 70% valid responses and were included in the statistical analyses. Surveys corresponded to South America in 62% of the cases, Central America and North America in 29.7%. 12.7% were residents. Regarding to PPE and internal management protocols, 88% confirmed the implementation of specific protocols and 45.4% have not received training to perform a safe clinical practice; only 2.3% reported being infected with COVID-19. 60.9% attended urgent surgeries. The following major uro-oncologic surgeries were reported as high priority: Radical Nephrectomy (RN) 58.4%, and Radical Cystectomy (RC) 57.3%. When we associate the capacity of hospitalization (urologic beds available) and percentage of high-priority surgery performed, we observed that centers with fewer urological beds (10-20) compared to centers with more urological beds (31-40) performed more frequently major urologic cancer surgeries: RN 54.5% vs 60.8% (p=0.0003), RC 53.1% vs 64.9% (p=0.005) respectively. Conclusions: At the time of writing (May 13th 2020) our data represents a snapshot of COVID-19 outbreak in Latin American urological practices. Our findings have practical implications and should be contextualized considering many factors related to patients and urological care: The variability of health care scenarios, institutional capacity, heterogeneity and burden of urologic disease, impact of surgical indications and decision making when prioritizing and scheduling surgeries in times of COVID-19 pandemic.


Subject(s)
Humans , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Urologic Surgical Procedures/statistics & numerical data , Urology/trends , Surveys and Questionnaires , Pandemics , Betacoronavirus , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19 , Hospitals/statistics & numerical data , Latin America
7.
World J Urol ; 35(1): 57-65, 2017 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27137994

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To describe the perioperative and oncology outcomes in a series of laparoscopic or robotic partial nephrectomies (PN) for renal tumors treated in diverse institutions of Hispanic America from the beginning of their minimally invasive (MI) PN experience through December 2014. METHODS: Seventeen institutions participated in the CAU generated a MI PN database. We estimated proportions, medians, 95 % confidence intervals, Kaplan-Meier curves, multivariate logistic and Cox regression analyses. Clavien-Dindo classification was used. RESULTS: We evaluated 1501 laparoscopic (98 %) or robotic (2 %) PNs. Median age: 58 years. Median surgical time, warm ischemia and intraoperative bleeding were 150, 20 min and 200 cc. 81 % of the lesions were malignant, with clear cell histology being 65 % of the total. Median maximum tumor diameter is 2.7 cm, positive margin is 8.2 %, and median hospitalization is 3 days. One or more postoperative complication was recorded in 19.8 % of the patients: Clavien 1: 5.6 %; Clavien 2: 8.4 %; Clavien 3A: 1.5 %; Clavien 3B: 3.2 %; Clavien 4A: 1 %; Clavien 4B: 0.1 %; Clavien 5: 0 %. Bleeding was the main cause of a reoperation (5.5 %), conversion to radical nephrectomy (3 %) or open partial nephrectomy (6 %). Transfusion rate is 10 %. In multivariate analysis, RENAL nephrometry score was the only variable associated with complications (OR 1.1; 95 % CI 1.02-1.2; p = 0.02). Nineteen patients presented disease progression or died of disease in a median follow-up of 1.37 years. The 5-year progression or kidney cancer mortality-free rate was 94 % (95 % CI 90, 97). Positive margins (HR 4.98; 95 % CI 1.3-19; p = 0.02) and females (HR 5.6; 95 % CI 1.7-19; p = 0.005) were associated with disease progression or kidney cancer mortality after adjusting for maximum tumor diameter. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic PN in these centers of Hispanic America seem to have acceptable perioperative complications and short-term oncologic outcomes.


Subject(s)
Adenoma, Oxyphilic/surgery , Angiomyolipoma/surgery , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/surgery , Kidney Neoplasms/surgery , Nephrectomy/methods , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Adenoma, Oxyphilic/pathology , Aged , Angiomyolipoma/pathology , Blood Loss, Surgical , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/pathology , Conversion to Open Surgery , Databases, Factual , Female , Hand-Assisted Laparoscopy/methods , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Kidney Neoplasms/pathology , Laparoscopy/methods , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Logistic Models , Male , Margins of Excision , Mexico , Middle Aged , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/methods , Multivariate Analysis , Neoplasm Staging , Operative Time , Proportional Hazards Models , Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods , South America , Spain , Tumor Burden , Warm Ischemia
8.
Rev. Fac. Odontol. Univ. Antioq ; 21(1): 6-15, Dic. 2009. tab, graf
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: lil-540603

ABSTRACT

Introducción: la carga inmediata se ha convertido en una alternativa viable de tratamiento que ofrece múltiplesbeneficios a los pacientes como función y estética inmediata, reducción del trauma quirúrgico y disminución del tiempo total de tratamiento. Se hizo un estudio prospectivo controlado para la colocación de implantes en casos clínicos de restauración de dienteúnico que recogiese el consenso propuesto en la literatura para evaluar el éxito clínico bajo el protocolo de carga inmediata: implantes de conexión interna, cónicos, de superficie texturizada y un mínimo de 32 Ncm de torque inicial. Métodos: se colocaron21 implantes Renova® (Lifecore Biomedical Inc., Chaska, MN) en 17 pacientes adultos (6 hombres y 11 mujeres) rango de edad entre 18 y 74 años, sistémicamente sanos con necesidad de reemplazo de diente único en sectores anterior y premolar de ambos maxilares. Resultados: la tasa de éxito acumulativa a 18 meses fue de 95,2%. Se obtuvieron valores de éxito similares a los reportados con el protocolo de carga convencional y se encontró correlación directa entre la distancia desde el hueso al punto decontacto y el porcentaje de presencia de papila en el espacio interproximal. Conclusión: los resultados indican que el protocolo de carga inmediata para el tratamiento de restauraciones de diente único en la zona anterior mediante implantes temporalizadosinmediatamente, sin función oclusal, es una alternativa viable con tasas de éxitos mayores al 95%, comparables a las logradas con el protocolo de carga convencional.


Introduction: immediate loading of implants has become a viable treatment alternative that offers multiple benefitsfor patients such as providing immediate function and esthetics, reduction of surgical trauma and less treatment time. A controlled prospective clinical trial was conducted to evaluate the success of immediately loaded implants for single-tooth restoration following consensus protocols in recent literature. Methods: twenty-one 3.75 x 13mm RBM-treated surface internal connection implants (Renova®, Lifecore Biomedical Inc., Chaska Mn.) were placed in 17 systemically healthy patients (6 males, 11 females), ages between 18 and 74 years who required single-tooth replacement in the anterior and premolar regions of both jaws. Results: the 18-month cumulative success rate for this study was 95.2%. According to the statistical analysis in this study, immediate loading of implants for single-tooth restoration compares favorably to the two-stage protocol and a direct correlation between the distancefrom bone to contact point and papilla filling was found. Conclusions: results from the present study indicate that the single-tooth restoration in the anterior area with immediately loaded surface-treated threaded titanium implants and no occlusal function is a viable treatment alternative with a success rate greater than 95%, comparable to the conventional loading protocol.


Subject(s)
Humans , Dental Implants , Titanium
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...