ABSTRACT
AIM: Pleural effusion (PE) is a common chest radiography (CXR) finding in patients with advanced cardiac disease. The pathophysiology and clinical value of PE in this setting are incompletely defined. We aimed to assess the haemodynamic correlates and prognostic impact of PE in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS). METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied 471 patients (mean age 74 ± 10 years) with severe AS (indexed aortic valve area 0.42 ± 0.12 cm2/m2, left ventricular ejection fraction 58 ± 12%) undergoing right heart catheterization and upright CXR prior to aortic valve replacement (AVR). Two radiologist independently evaluated all CXR for the presence of bilateral PE, unilateral, or no PE, blinded to any other data. There were 49 (10%) patients with bilateral PE, 32 (7%) patients with unilateral PE, and 390 (83%) patients with no PE. Patients with bilateral PE had the highest mean right atrial pressure, mean pulmonary artery wedge pressure (mPAWP), and pulmonary vascular resistance, and had the lowest stroke volume index while those with unilateral PE had intermediate values. In the multivariate analysis, mPAWP was an independent predictor of any PE and bilateral PE. After a median (interquartile range) post-AVR follow-up of 1361 (957-1878) days mortality was highest in patients with bilateral PE (2.7 times higher than in patients without PE), whereas patients with unilateral PE had similar mortality as those without PE. CONCLUSIONS: In severe AS patients, the presence of PE, particularly bilateral PE, is a marker of a poor haemodynamic constellation. Bilateral PE is associated with a substantially increased post-AVR mortality.
Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Stenosis , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation , Pleural Effusion , Humans , Middle Aged , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Stroke Volume/physiology , Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery , Ventricular Function, Left , Hemodynamics/physiology , Prognosis , Pleural Effusion/complications , Pleural Effusion/surgeryABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are among the most promising treatment options for melanoma and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). While ICIs can induce effective anti-tumor responses, they may also drive serious immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Identifying biomarkers to predict which patients will suffer from irAEs would enable more accurate clinical risk-benefit analysis for ICI treatment and may also shed light on common or distinct mechanisms underpinning treatment success and irAEs. METHODS: In this prospective multi-center study, we combined a multi-omics approach including unbiased single-cell profiling of over 300 peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) samples and high-throughput proteomics analysis of over 500 serum samples to characterize the systemic immune compartment of patients with melanoma or NSCLC before and during treatment with ICIs. FINDINGS: When we combined the parameters obtained from the multi-omics profiling of patient blood and serum, we identified potential predictive biomarkers for ICI-induced irAEs. Specifically, an early increase in CXCL9/CXCL10/CXCL11 and interferon-γ (IFN-γ) 1 to 2 weeks after the start of therapy are likely indicators of heightened risk of developing irAEs. In addition, an early expansion of Ki-67+ regulatory T cells (Tregs) and Ki-67+ CD8+ T cells is also likely to be associated with increased risk of irAEs. CONCLUSIONS: We suggest that the combination of these cellular and proteomic biomarkers may help to predict which patients are likely to benefit most from ICI therapy and those requiring intensive monitoring for irAEs. FUNDING: This work was primarily funded by the European Research Council, the Swiss National Science Foundation, the Swiss Cancer League, and the Forschungsförderung of the Kantonsspital St. Gallen.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung , Immune System Diseases , Lung Neoplasms , Melanoma , Humans , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/pathology , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/adverse effects , Leukocytes, Mononuclear/pathology , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes/pathology , Ki-67 Antigen , Prospective Studies , Proteomics , Melanoma/drug therapy , Immune System Diseases/drug therapyABSTRACT
Background: The relationship between chest radiograph (CXR) findings of pulmonary congestion and invasive hemodynamics and clinical outcomes in patients with cardiac diseases is unclear. We assessed the correlation between a CXR-based congestion score (RxCS) and the mean pulmonary artery wedge pressure (mPAWP) and the prognostic impact of RxCS and mPAWP in severe aortic stenosis (AS). Methods: In 471 patients with severe AS undergoing right heart catheterization and upright CXR, the RxCS was calculated (6 items, maximum score: 10 points) independently by 2 radiologists (average value taken) blinded to clinical data. Congestion was defined as an RxCS > 1. Four patterns were defined based on the presence or absence of congestion (C+ or C-) and elevated (> 15 mm Hg) or normal mPAWP (P+ or P-). Results: The median (interquartile range) RxCS was 1 (0-2). Patients with an RxCS > 1 (n = 207) had a higher mean right atrial pressure, mean pulmonary artery pressure, mPAWP, and pulmonary vascular resistance than patients with an RxCS ≤ 1 (n = 264). However, the correlation between the RxCS and the mPAWP was moderate only (r = 0.45). Patients with a C+/P+ pattern had the worst hemodynamics, whereas C-/P- patients had the most favourable constellation. After a median post-valve replacement follow-up of 1361 days, mortality was higher in patients with RxCs > 1 vs ≤ 1 as well as mPAWP > 15 mm Hg vs ≤15 mm Hg. Mortality was highest in C+/P+ patients and lowest in C-/P- patients, whereas it was intermediate in C-/P+ and C+/P- patients. Conclusions: In AS patients, RxCS and mPAWP have a significant but moderate correlation. Both RxCS and mPAWP provide prognostic information.
Contexte: Des zones floues persistent quant au lien entre les signes de congestion pulmonaire à la radiographie thoracique, les examens hémodynamiques invasifs et les résultats cliniques chez les patients atteints de maladies cardiaques. Nous avons donc évalué, d'une part, la corrélation entre le score radiologique de congestion pulmonaire et la pression capillaire pulmonaire moyenne et, d'autre part, la valeur pronostique du score radiologique de congestion pulmonaire et de la pression capillaire pulmonaire moyenne dans les cas de sténose aortique sévère. Méthodologie: Chez 471 patients atteints d'une sténose aortique sévère soumis à un cathétérisme du cÅur droit et à une radiographie thoracique en position debout, un score radiologique de congestion pulmonaire a été calculé (6 items, score maximal de 10 points) de façon indépendante par deux radiologistes (la valeur retenue étant la moyenne) qui ne connaissaient pas les données cliniques des patients. La congestion correspondait à un score radiologique de congestion pulmonaire > 1. Quatre types ont été définis en fonction de la présence ou de l'absence de congestion (C+ ou C) et d'une valeur de pression capillaire pulmonaire moyenne élevée (>15 mmHg) ou normale (P+ ou P). Résultats: La médiane (écart interquartile) du score radiologique de congestion a été de 1 (0-2). Les patients dont le score radiologique de congestion était > 1 (n = 207) présentaient des valeurs moyennes plus élevées pour la pression auriculaire droite, la pression artérielle pulmonaire, la pression capillaire pulmonaire et la résistance vasculaire pulmonaire que les patients dont le score radiologique de congestion était ≤ 1 (n = 264). Cependant, la corrélation entre le score radiologique de congestion et la pression capillaire pulmonaire moyenne n'était que modérée (r = 0,45). Les patients de type C+/P+ avaient le profil hémodynamique le plus défavorable, tandis que les patients de type C/P avaient le profil le plus favorable. À l'issue d'un suivi médian de 1361 jours après un remplacement valvulaire, la mortalité était plus élevée chez les patients dont le score radiologique de congestion était > 1 vs un score ≤ 1, de même que chez les patients dont la pression capillaire pulmonaire moyenne était > 15 mmHg vs une valeur ≤ 15 mmHg. La mortalité la plus élevée a été observée chez les patients de type C+/P+, et la plus faible, chez les patients de type C/P, tandis qu'elle était intermédiaire chez les patients de types C/P+ et C+/P. Conclusions: Chez les patients atteints d'une sténose aortique, on constate une corrélation significative mais modérée entre le score radiologique de congestion pulmonaire et la pression capillaire pulmonaire moyenne. Ces paramètres revêtent tous deux une valeur pronostique.