Milk yield loss in response to feed restriction is associated with mammary epithelial cell exfoliation in dairy cows.

In dairy cows, feed restriction is known to decrease milk yield by reducing the number of mammary epithelial cells (MEC) in the udder through a shift in the MEC proliferation-apoptosis balance, by reducing the metabolic activity of MEC, or both. The exfoliation of MEC from the mammary epithelium into milk is another process that may participate in regulating the number of MEC during feed restriction. The aim of the present study was to clarify the mechanisms that underlie the milk yield loss induced by feed restriction. Nineteen Holstein dairy cows producing 40.0 ± 0.7 kg/d at 77 ± 5 d in milk were divided into a control group (n = 9) and a feed-restricted group (n = 10). Ad libitum dry matter intake (DMI) was recorded during a pre-experimental period of 2 wk. For 29 d (period 1), cows were fed either 100 (control) or 80% (feed-restricted) of their ad libitum DMI measured during the pre-experimental period. Then, all cows were fed ad libitum for 35 d (period 2). Milk production and DMI were recorded daily. Blood and milk samples were collected once during the pre-experimental period; on d 5, 9, and 27 of period 1; and on d 5, 9, and 30 of period 2. Mammary epithelial cells were purified from milk using an immunomagnetic method to determine the rate of MEC exfoliation. Mammary tissue samples were collected by biopsy at the end of each period to analyze the rates of cell proliferation and apoptosis and the expression of genes involved in synthesizing constituents of milk. Feed restriction decreased milk yield by 3 kg/d but had no effect on rates of proliferation and apoptosis in the mammary tissue or on the expression of genes involved in milk synthesis. The daily MEC exfoliation rate was 65% greater in feed-restricted cows than in control cows. These effects in feed-restricted cows were associated with reduced insulin-like growth factor-1 and cortisol plasma concentrations. When all cows returned to ad libitum feeding, no significant difference on milk yield or MEC exfoliation rate was observed between feed-restricted and control cows, but refeeding increased prolactin release during milking. These results show that the exfoliation process may play a role in regulating the number of MEC in the udders of dairy cows during feed restriction without any carryover effect on their milk production.

Mammary epithelium disruption and mammary epithelial cell exfoliation during milking in dairy cows.

The presence of mammary epithelial cells (MEC) in the milk of ruminants indicates that some MEC are shed from the mammary epithelium; however, the mechanisms that regulate the MEC exfoliation process are not known. Through the release of oxytocin, prolactin, and cortisol and through oxytocin-induced mechanical forces on the mammary epithelium, milking could participate in regulating the MEC exfoliation process. The aims of the present study were to determine the rate of MEC exfoliation throughout milking and to investigate its relationship to mammary epithelium integrity and milking-induced hormone release. Milk samples from 9 Holstein dairy cows producing 40.6 ± 1.36 kg of milk/d were collected at the beginning (after 1 and 2 min), in the middle, and at the end of milking. Milk MEC were purified using an immunomagnetic method. Blood samples were collected before, during, and after milking, and the oxytocin, prolactin, and cortisol concentrations in the samples were measured. Tight junction opening was assessed by plasma lactose concentration and the Na+:K+ ratio in milk. The somatic cell count in milk varied during the course of milking; it decreased at the beginning of milking and then increased, reaching the highest values at the end of milking. Exfoliated MEC were present in all milk samples collected. The presence of MEC in the milk sample collected during min 1 of milking, likely corresponding to the cisternal milk fraction, suggests that MEC were exfoliated between milkings. The observed increase in the Na+:K+ ratio in milk and in the plasma concentration of lactose indicated that disruption of mammary epithelium integrity occurred during milking. The MEC exfoliation rate at milking was not correlated with the variables describing milking-induced prolactin release but was negatively correlated with cortisol release, suggesting that cortisol may play a role in limiting exfoliation. In conclusion, milking induced a disruption of the mammary epithelial barrier. Mammary epithelial cells may be continuously exfoliated between milkings or exfoliated during milking as a consequence of the oxytocin-induced mechanical forces and the disruption of mammary epithelium integrity.

In vivo inhibition followed by exogenous supplementation demonstrates galactopoietic effects of prolactin on mammary tissue and milk production in dairy cows.

It has been previously shown that the long-term inhibition of milking-induced prolactin (PRL) release by quinagolide (QN), a dopamine agonist, reduces milk yield in dairy cows. To further demonstrate that PRL is galactopoietic in cows, we performed a short-term experiment that used PRL injections to restore the release of PRL at milking in QN-treated cows. Nine Holstein cows were assigned to treatments during three 5-d periods in a 3×3 Latin square design: 1) QN: twice-daily i.m. injections of 1mg of QN; 2) QN-PRL: twice-daily i.m. injections of 1mg of QN and twice-daily (at milking time) i.v. injections of PRL (2µg/kg body weight); and 3) control: twice-daily injections of the vehicles. Mammary epithelial cells (MEC) were purified from milk so that their viability could be assessed, and mammary biopsies were harvested for immunohistological analyses of cell proliferation using PCNA and STAT5 staining. In both milk-purified MEC and mammary tissue, the mRNA levels of milk proteins and BAX were determined using real-time reverse-transcription PCR. Daily QN injections reduced milking-induced PRL release. The area under the PRL curve was similar in the control and PRL injection treatments, but the shape was different. The QN treatment decreased milk, lactose, protein, and casein production. Injections of PRL did not restore milk yield but tended to increase milk protein yield. In mammary tissue, the percentage of STAT5-positive cells was reduced during QN but not during QN-PRL in comparison with the control treatment. The percentage of PCNA-positive cells was greater during QN-PRL injections than during the control or QN treatment and tended to be lower during QN than during the control treatment. In milk-purified MEC, κ-casein and α-lactalbumin mRNA levels were lower during QN than during the control treatment, but during QN-PRL, they were not different from the control treatment. In mammary tissue, the BAX mRNA level was lower during QN-PRL than during QN. The number of MEC exfoliated into milk was increased by QN injections but tended to be decreased by PRL injections. Injections of PRL also increased the viability of MEC harvested from milk. Although PRL injections at milking could not reverse the effect of QN treatment on milk production, their effects on cell survival and exfoliation and on gene expression suggest that the effect of QN treatment on the mammary gland is due to QN's inhibition of PRL secretion.