Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Assist Reprod Genet ; 36(1): 145-151, 2019 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30328573

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To study if the number of trophectoderm (TE) biopsied cells has an impact on implantation rates. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study in a single-center study. SETTING: In vitro fertilization center. PATIENTS: Patients who underwent PGT-A from January 2013 to March 2016. In total, 482 vitrified/warmed single embryo transfers were included. INTERVENTIONS: None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Clinical pregnancies rate, implantation rate. RESULTS: Overall, clinical pregnancies per embryo transfer were higher when a regular TE were biopsied compared to larger size biopsy cells (66% (175/267) vs 53% (115/215) (p < 0.005) respectively). Pregnancy rates were also analyzed according to embryo morphology at the moment of embryo biopsy, when a good-quality embryo was transferred the clinical outcome was 75% (81/108) in group 1 and 61% (60/99) in group 2 (p < 0.05). Data was also stratified by age in patients ≤ 35 years and > 35 years. The clinical pregnancy was 67% (51/76) in women ≤ 35 years and 65% (124/191) in women > 35 years when a regular size biopsy was performed. These results significantly reduced when a larger size biopsy was performed 54% (49/91) and 53% (66/124), respectively (p < 0.05). Further investigation indicated that miscarriage rate was similar between these groups (4% (7/182) in group 1 and 5% (6/121) in group 2). CONCLUSIONS: These findings underscore that when a large amount of TE cells are biopsied, it may negatively affect implantation rates, but once implanted, the embryos have the same chance to miscarry or reach term.


Subject(s)
Ectoderm/cytology , Embryo Implantation , Embryo Transfer , Pregnancy Outcome , Pregnancy Rate , Trophoblasts/cytology , Adult , Biopsy , Ectoderm/metabolism , Embryo Culture Techniques , Female , Fertilization in Vitro , Humans , Ploidies , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide , Pregnancy , Preimplantation Diagnosis/methods , Retrospective Studies , Trophoblasts/metabolism
2.
Curr Cancer Drug Targets ; 12(6): 693-702, 2012 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22463589

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Almost 30% of the sunitinib-treated patients for metastatic renal carcinoma (mRCC) do not receive a clinical benefit. Convincing evidences demonstrated a cross talk between the VEGF and CXCR4 pathways. It was hypothesized that CXCR4 expression in primary renal cancer could predict sunitinib responsiveness. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this exploratory study sixty-two mRCC patients receiving sunitinib as first-line treatment were evaluated for CXCR4 expression through immunohistochemistry (IHC). Correlations between CXCR4 expression, baseline patients and tumour characteristics were studied by contingency tables and the chi-square test. Univariable analysis was performed with the log-rank test, and the Cox model was applied for multivariable analysis. RESULTS: The objective response rate of sunitinib first-line therapy was 35.5% (22/62) with a disease control rate (response and stable disease) of 62.9% (39/62). CXCR4 expression was absent/low in 30 (48.4%), moderate in 17 (27.4%), and high in 15 (24.2%) tumors respectively. Low or absent CXCR4 expression predicted response to sunitinib therapy. Moreover, Fuhrman grading and concomitant, CXCR4 and Fuhrman grading, strongly predicted sunitinib first line therapy responsiveness on progression-free survival and overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: High CXCR4 expression correlates with sunitinib poor response in metastatic renal cancer.


Subject(s)
Angiogenesis Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Biomarkers, Tumor/metabolism , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/immunology , Indoles/therapeutic use , Kidney Neoplasms/drug therapy , Kidney Neoplasms/immunology , Pyrroles/therapeutic use , Receptors, CXCR4/metabolism , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/genetics , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/mortality , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/secondary , Cell Line, Tumor , Chi-Square Distribution , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Humans , Immunohistochemistry , Italy , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Kidney Neoplasms/genetics , Kidney Neoplasms/mortality , Kidney Neoplasms/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Neoplasm Grading , Predictive Value of Tests , Proportional Hazards Models , RNA, Messenger/metabolism , Receptors, CXCR4/genetics , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Sunitinib , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
3.
Curr Cancer Drug Targets ; 10(7): 772-81, 2010 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20578990

ABSTRACT

CXCR4 is a chemokine receptor implicated in the metastatic process. The CXCR4 ligand, CXCL12, was shown to bind also the CXCR7 receptor, a recently deorphanized chemokine receptor whose signalling pathway and function are still controversial. This study was conducted to determine patients clinic-pathological factors and outcome according to the expressions of CXCR4 and CXCR7 in renal cell carcinoma (RCC). CXCR4 and CXCR7 expression was evaluated in 223 RCC patients through immunohistochemistry; moreover CXCR4 and CXCR7 was detected in 49 others consecutive RCC patients trough RT- PCR. CXCR4 expression was low in 42/223 RCC (18.8%), intermediate in 71/223 (31.9%) and high in 110/223 (49.3%). CXCR7 expression was low in 44/223 RCC patients (19.8%), intermediate in 65/223 (29.1%) and high in 114/223 (51.1%). High CXCR4 and high CXCR7 expression predicted shorter disease free survival. In multivariate analysis, high CXCR4 expression (p= 0.0061), high CXCR7 (p= 0.0194) expression and the concomitant high expression of CXCR4 and CXCR7 (p= 0.0235) are independent prognosis factors. Through RT-PCR, CXCR4 was overexpressed in 36/49 and CXCR7 in 33/49 samples correlating with symptoms at diagnosis and lymph nodes status. So we can hypothesize that CXCR4 and CXCR7, singularly evaluated and in combination, are valuable prognostic factors in RCC patients.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell/diagnosis , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/metabolism , Kidney Neoplasms/diagnosis , Kidney Neoplasms/metabolism , Receptors, CXCR4/metabolism , Receptors, CXCR/metabolism , Aged , Aging , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/pathology , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/secondary , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Humans , Immunohistochemistry , Kidney/metabolism , Kidney/pathology , Kidney Neoplasms/pathology , Lymphatic Metastasis , Male , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Neoplasm Staging , Prognosis , RNA, Messenger/metabolism , Receptors, CXCR/genetics , Receptors, CXCR4/genetics , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction , Survival Analysis
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...