Repeatedly pairing vagus nerve stimulation with a movement reorganizes primary motor cortex.

Although sensory and motor systems support different functions, both systems exhibit experience-dependent cortical plasticity under similar conditions. If mechanisms regulating cortical plasticity are common to sensory and motor cortices, then methods generating plasticity in sensory cortex should be effective in motor cortex. Repeatedly pairing a tone with a brief period of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) increases the proportion of primary auditory cortex responding to the paired tone (Engineer ND, Riley JR, Seale JD, Vrana WA, Shetake J, Sudanagunta SP, Borland MS, Kilgard MP. 2011. Reversing pathological neural activity using targeted plasticity. Nature. 470:101-104). In this study, we predicted that repeatedly pairing VNS with a specific movement would result in an increased representation of that movement in primary motor cortex. To test this hypothesis, we paired VNS with movements of the distal or proximal forelimb in 2 groups of rats. After 5 days of VNS movement pairing, intracranial microstimulation was used to quantify the organization of primary motor cortex. Larger cortical areas were associated with movements paired with VNS. Rats receiving identical motor training without VNS pairing did not exhibit motor cortex map plasticity. These results suggest that pairing VNS with specific events may act as a general method for increasing cortical representations of those events. VNS movement pairing could provide a new approach for treating disorders associated with abnormal movement representations.

Discrimination of brief speech sounds is impaired in rats with auditory cortex lesions.

Auditory cortex (AC) lesions impair complex sound discrimination. However, a recent study demonstrated spared performance on an acoustic startle response test of speech discrimination following AC lesions (Floody et al., 2010). The current study reports the effects of AC lesions on two operant speech discrimination tasks. AC lesions caused a modest and quickly recovered impairment in the ability of rats to discriminate consonant-vowel-consonant speech sounds. This result seems to suggest that AC does not play a role in speech discrimination. However, the speech sounds used in both studies differed in many acoustic dimensions and an adaptive change in discrimination strategy could allow the rats to use an acoustic difference that does not require an intact AC to discriminate. Based on our earlier observation that the first 40 ms of the spatiotemporal activity patterns elicited by speech sounds best correlate with behavioral discriminations of these sounds (Engineer et al., 2008), we predicted that eliminating additional cues by truncating speech sounds to the first 40 ms would render the stimuli indistinguishable to a rat with AC lesions. Although the initial discrimination of truncated sounds took longer to learn, the final performance paralleled rats using full-length consonant-vowel-consonant sounds. After 20 days of testing, half of the rats using speech onsets received bilateral AC lesions. Lesions severely impaired speech onset discrimination for at least one-month post lesion. These results support the hypothesis that auditory cortex is required to accurately discriminate the subtle differences between similar consonant and vowel sounds.

Effects of damage to auditory cortex on the discrimination of speech sounds by rats.

The intensity of a noise-induced startle response can be reduced by the presentation of an otherwise neutral stimulus immediately before the noise ("prepulse inhibition" or PPI). We used a form of PPI to study the effects of damage to auditory cortex on the discrimination of speech sounds by rats. Subjects underwent control surgery or treatment of the auditory cortex with the vasoconstrictor endothelin-1. This treatment caused damage concentrated in primary auditory cortex (A1). Both before and after lesions, subjects were tested on 5 tasks, most presenting a pair of human speech sounds (consonant-vowel syllables) so that the capacity for discrimination would be evident in the extent of PPI. Group comparisons failed to reveal any consistent lesion effect. At the same time, the analysis of individual differences in performance by multiple regression suggests that some of the temporal processing required to discriminate speech sounds is concentrated anteroventrally in the right A1. These results also confirm that PPI can be adapted to studies of the brain mechanisms involved in the processing of speech and other complex sounds.