Cigarette smoke preferentially induces full length ACE2 expression in differentiated primary human airway cultures but does not alter the efficiency of cellular SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Cigarette smoking has many serious negative health consequences. The relationship between smoking and SARS-CoV-2 infection is controversial, specifically whether smokers are at increased risk of infection. We investigated the impact of cigarette smoke on ACE2 isoform expression and SARS-CoV-2 infection in differentiated primary human bronchial epithelial cells at the air-liquid-interface (ALI). We assessed the expression of ACE2 in response to CSE and therapeutics reported to modulate ACE2. We exposed ALI cultures to cigarette smoke extract (CSE) and then infected them with SARS-CoV-2. We measured cellular infection using flow cytometry and whole-transwell immunofluorescence. We found that CSE increased expression of full-length ACE2 (flACE2) but did not alter the expression of a Type I-interferon sensitive truncated isoform (dACE2) that lacks the capacity to bind SARS-CoV-2. CSE did not have a significant impact on key mediators of the innate immune response. Importantly, we show that, despite the increase in flACE2, CSE did not alter airway cell infection after CSE exposure. We found that nicotine does not significantly alter flACE2 expression but that NRF2 agonists do lead to an increase in flACE2 expression. This increase was not associated with an increase in SARS-CoV-2 infection. Our results are consistent with the epidemiological data suggesting that current smokers do not have an excess of SARS-CoV-2 infection. but that those with chronic respiratory or cardiovascular disease are more vulnerable to severe COVID-19. They suggest that, in differentiated conducting airway cells, flACE2 expression levels may not limit airway SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Quantitative proteomic analysis of SARS-CoV-2 infection of primary human airway ciliated cells and lung epithelial cells demonstrates the effectiveness of SARS-CoV-2 innate immune evasion.

Background: Quantitative proteomics is able to provide a comprehensive, unbiased description of changes to cells caused by viral infection, but interpretation may be complicated by differential changes in infected and uninfected 'bystander' cells, or the use of non-physiological cellular models. Methods: In this paper, we use fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) and quantitative proteomics to analyse cell-autonomous changes caused by authentic SARS-CoV-2 infection of respiratory epithelial cells, the main target of viral infection in vivo. First, we determine the relative abundance of proteins in primary human airway epithelial cells differentiated at the air-liquid interface (basal, secretory and ciliated cells). Next, we specifically characterise changes caused by SARS-CoV-2 infection of ciliated cells. Finally, we compare temporal proteomic changes in infected and uninfected 'bystander' Calu-3 lung epithelial cells and compare infection with B.29 and B.1.1.7 (Alpha) variants. Results: Amongst 5,709 quantified proteins in primary human airway ciliated cells, the abundance of 226 changed significantly in the presence of SARS-CoV-2 infection (q <0.05 and >1.5-fold). Notably, viral replication proceeded without inducing a type-I interferon response. Amongst 6,996 quantified proteins in Calu-3 cells, the abundance of 645 proteins changed significantly in the presence of SARS-CoV-2 infection (q < 0.05 and > 1.5-fold). In contrast to the primary cell model, a clear type I interferon (IFN) response was observed. Nonetheless, induction of IFN-inducible proteins was markedly attenuated in infected cells, compared with uninfected 'bystander' cells. Infection with B.29 and B.1.1.7 (Alpha) variants gave similar results. Conclusions: Taken together, our data provide a detailed proteomic map of changes in SARS-CoV-2-infected respiratory epithelial cells in two widely used, physiologically relevant models of infection. As well as identifying dysregulated cellular proteins and processes, the effectiveness of strategies employed by SARS-CoV-2 to avoid the type I IFN response is illustrated in both models.

Topical TMPRSS2 inhibition prevents SARS-CoV-2 infection in differentiated human airway cultures.

BACKGROUND: There are limited effective prophylactic/early treatments for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. Viral entry requires spike protein binding to the angiotensin-converting enzyme-2 receptor and cleavage by transmembrane serine protease 2 (TMPRSS2), a cell surface serine protease. Targeting of TMPRSS2 by either androgen blockade or direct inhibition is in clinical trials in early SARS-CoV-2 infection. METHODS: We used differentiated primary human airway epithelial cells at the air-liquid interface to test the impact of targeting TMPRSS2 on the prevention of SARS-CoV-2 infection. RESULTS: We first modelled the systemic delivery of compounds. Enzalutamide, an oral androgen receptor antagonist, had no impact on SARS-CoV-2 infection. By contrast, camostat mesylate, an orally available serine protease inhibitor, blocked SARS-CoV-2 entry. However, oral camostat is rapidly metabolised in the circulation, with poor airway bioavailability. We therefore modelled local airway administration by applying camostat to the apical surface of differentiated airway cultures. We demonstrated that a brief exposure to topical camostat effectively restricts SARS-CoV-2 infection. CONCLUSION: These experiments demonstrate a potential therapeutic role for topical camostat for pre- or post-exposure prophylaxis of SARS-CoV-2, which can now be evaluated in a clinical trial.