[Erectile function after nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. Nocturnal early erection as a parameter of postoperative organic erectile integrity]. / Erektionsstatus nach nervenerhaltender radikaler Prostatektomie. Nächtliche Früherektion als Parameter der postoperativen organisch-erektilen Integrität.

The time lapse before recovery of erectile function after nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy is still under debate. Several pathophysiologies are postulated for postoperative erectile function rehabilitation. In prospective studies we measured nocturnal penile tumescence (NPTR) in the acute phase during the first night after catheter removal subsequent to nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy to assess the neuronal organic erectile integrity. Eighteen sexually active patients suffering from local prostate cancer underwent bilateral and unilateral nerve-sparing retropubic radical prostatectomy. All patients completed an IIEF-5 questionnaire concerning erectile function preoperatively. The transurethral catheter was removed 14 days after surgery, and nocturnal penile tumescence was measured with an erectometer (Rigi-Scan) in each patient during the following night. None of these patients received any comedication interacting with erectile function. The preoperative IIEF score was >18 in all patients. After catheter removal, 17 of 18 patients (95%) had nocturnal penile radial rigidity >70% that persisted for >10 min during one night. In a control of four patients without a nerve-sparing procedure, no nocturnal erections were recorded. The measurement of NPTR in the acute phase after nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy showed retained erectile function even during the "first" night after catheter removal. Our findings are important for an appropriate choice of pharmacotherapy for optimal recovery of erectile function. In cases of early penile erections, the cavernous nerve had been well preserved during surgery providing good neuronal integrity, and PDE-5 inhibitors can support organic rehabilitation of the corpus cavernosum. In the absence of early penile erections, the neuronal integrity of the cavernous nerve is presumed to be impaired. In this case, additional injection therapy should be chosen to support recovery of spontaneous erectile function.

Slightly modified technique of the original Essed plication procedure for congenital penile deviation.

PURPOSE: The Schroeder-Essed plication procedure is a standard technique for the correction of penile curvature. In a retrospective analysis we compared functional results and quality of life (LQ) of the original technique with inverted sutures as described by Schroeder-Essed and our slight modification consisting of horizontal incisions into the tunica albuginea. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-six patients with congenital penis deviation were treated for penile deviation by the original Schroeder-Essed plication with inverted sutures (11 patients) and by the described modification (15 patients). In case of modified technique, horizontal and parallel incisions 4 mm to 6 mm apart and about 8 mm - 10 mm long were made through the tunica albuginea. The outer edges of the incisions were then approximated with permanent inverted sutures (Gore-Tex 3-0). Mean age was 21.6 years in the first group and 23.2 years in the second group. Average follow-up was 28 months and 13 months, respectively. The preoperative penile deviation angle was > 25 degrees in all patients without difference between the 2 groups. RESULTS: All patients in both groups reported an improvement in their quality of life and full ability to engage in sexual intercourse. Nine patients (88%) in the first group and 14 patients (93%) in the second group were satisfied with the cosmetic result. In contrast, 10 patients (91%) of the first and 13 patients (87%) of the second group complained of penile shorting. Recurrence of deviation was only noticed in 2 males in the first group (18%). CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that this simple modification of the Schroeder-Essed plication offers good functional and cosmetic results. Most patients were satisfied with the penile angle correction results.