ABSTRACT
Introduction T-type fractures of the acetabulum are uncommon injuries, typically resulting in poorer long-term outcomes compared to other patterns of acetabular fractures. Our main purpose is to analyse the epidemiology, functional outcomes, and factors affecting the functional outcomes of patients with T-type acetabular fractures. Methods This prospective, single-centre study included 73 patients with T-type and T with posterior wall acetabular fractures. They underwent treatment with open reduction internal fixation using plating through the modified Stoppa, Kocher-Langenbeck (KL), or dual approach. The post-operative reduction was assessed according to Matta's criteria, and functional outcomes were evaluated using the modified Harris hip score. Results Between September 2017 and January 2023, 53 patients underwent surgery for T-type fractures (72.6%), and 20 patients were treated for T with posterior wall acetabular fractures (27.4%). The minimum follow-up period was one year, with a mean follow-up of 3.5 years. Anatomical reduction emerged as the major contributing factor towards good functional outcomes compared to satisfactory reduction according to Matta's criteria (P value: 0.006). Overall, 65 patients (89%) achieved excellent to good modified Harris hip scores, while eight patients (11%) obtained fair to poor scores. Patients with T-type fractures demonstrated better functional outcomes compared to T with posterior wall fractures (P value: 0.031). Conclusion Anatomical reduction, as assessed by Matta's reduction criteria, serves as a predictor of favourable functional outcomes. T with posterior wall fractures exhibit poor outcomes in comparison to T-type fractures. The surgical approach employed does not influence the reduction or the final functional outcome of the patient.
