Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Ann R Coll Surg Engl ; 97(2): 140-5, 2015 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25723692

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Oesophageal perforation following chemoradiotherapy for oesophageal cancer is a devastating condition but there have been no studies investigating the role of emergency oesophagectomy for this life threatening situation. METHODS: This retrospective study comprised all cases of emergency oesophagectomy for oesophageal perforation after chemoradiotherapy for oesophageal carcinoma at a major centre for oesophageal surgery in Germany between 2004 and 2013. RESULTS: A total of 13 patients (mean age: 58.9 years) were identified. During the same time period, 356 elective oesophagectomies were performed. Tumour entities were squamous cell carcinoma (n=12) and adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus (n=1). Alcoholism (odds ratio [OR]: 25.79, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.70-121.70, p<0.0001) and chronic pulmonary disease (OR: 3.76, 95% CI: 1.06-14.96, p=0.027) were more common among the emergency cases. Oesophageal rupture was caused by perforation of an oesophageal stent (10 cases) or perforation during implantation of a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube (3 cases). Emergency oesophagectomy was carried out either as discontinuity resection (10/13) or oesophagectomy with immediate reconstruction (3/13). Compared with the elective cases, patients undergoing emergency oesophagectomy had significantly higher odds for sustaining perioperative sepsis (OR: 4.42, 95% CI: 1.23-16.45, p=0.01), acute renal failure (OR: 6.49, 95% CI: 1.57-24.15, p=0.005) and pneumonia (OR: 24.33, 95% CI: 3.52-1,046.65, p<0.0001). Furthermore, slow respiratory weaning was more common and there was a significantly higher tracheostomy rate (OR: 4.64, 95% CI: 1.14-16.98, p=0.02). Oesophageal discontinuity was eventually reversed in eight patients. Emergency oesophagectomy patients had odds that were three times higher for fatal outcome (OR: 3.59, 95% CI: 0.77-13.64, p=0.05). The overall mortality was 4/13. The remaining nine patients had a mean survival of 25.1 months (range: 5-46 months). The two-year-survival-rate was 38.5% (5/13). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the most unfavourable preconditions, the results of emergency oesophagectomy for oesophageal perforation after chemoradiotherapy are not desperate. The procedure is not only justified but life saving.


Subject(s)
Chemoradiotherapy/adverse effects , Emergencies , Esophageal Neoplasms/therapy , Esophageal Perforation/surgery , Esophagectomy , Acute Kidney Injury/epidemiology , Adenocarcinoma/therapy , Aged , Alcoholism/epidemiology , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/therapy , Chronic Disease , Empyema, Pleural/epidemiology , Esophageal Perforation/etiology , Esophagectomy/mortality , Esophagectomy/statistics & numerical data , Female , Gastrostomy/adverse effects , Gastrostomy/instrumentation , Germany/epidemiology , Humans , Lung Diseases/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Pneumonia/epidemiology , Reoperation/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Salvage Therapy/statistics & numerical data , Sepsis/epidemiology , Stents/adverse effects , Tracheostomy/statistics & numerical data , Ventilator Weaning
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...