ABSTRACT
The abdominal wall represents a unique structure of dermo-myotendinous conformation that is considered a surgical challenge. The musculocutaneous pedicled flap, using tensor fasciae latae muscle (TFL), is a technique of abdominal wall repair, and it is becoming a more frequent reconstructive procedure. It is a well-suited procedure because it provides both a semirigid fascia layer and adequate skin coverage. We present a case of a 61-year-old man with the diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma of the bladder, clinical stage IV (T4bN1M1), complicated with an ileo-recal-urethrocutaneous fistula. We reconstructed a massive defect of the abdominal wall by rotating bilateral pedicled TFL flaps. The therapeutic plan comprised 2 surgical procedures. The first surgical intervention was intended to obtain and temporarily fix the flap, and to allow the delay phenomenon to occur. Three weeks later, we performed the abdominal wall reconstruction by repositioning the bilateral TFL flaps and placing a dual prolene with regenerated oxidized cellulose mesh. We performed a successful palliative procedure in a terminal oncologic patient. Combined with a massive oncologic procedure (done by the oncologic surgeon), we were able to solve the cutaneous fistula and provided a significant improvement in the quality of life. The patient was discharged with no procedure-related complications. He has remained healthy 18 months after surgery, and there has been no evidence of ventral hernia. Bilateral TFL flaps represent a viable alternative for primary or secondary abdominal wall reconstruction in selected cases. This reconstructive strategy should be considered when plastic and reconstructive surgeon faces large and complex abdominal wall defects, associated with significant lack of skin cover.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: There is an ongoing debate over certain aspects of laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) over open appendectomy (OA) in regard to hospitalization costs and associated complications. METHODS: A database was used to obtain the charts for either LA or OA performed during a 5-year period. Variables analyzed were age, gender, hospitalization cost, length of stay and complications. RESULTS: Of 1792 appendectomies performed, 633 (35.3%) were OA and 1159 (64.6%) were LA. Both groups were statistically similar with regard to gender (p = 0.075) but differed with respect to age, demonstrating an older patient population in the LA group (p <0.0001). Length of stay was significantly higher in the OA group (3.33 vs. 2.52) days, p <0.0001). The overall hospitalization cost of LA was 25% higher than the OA cost (p = 0.0005). The cost of an uncomplicated LA case was 1.7 times higher than in the OA group (p ≤ 0.0001). We found no statistically significant differences between the hospitalization cost of an OA and LA group when both procedures were associated with a complication (p = 0.5319). A higher complication rate was observed in the OA group, 60 cases (9.47%) as compared to the LA group, 46 cases (3.96%), p <0.0001. The increased rate of complications observed was related to cardiovascular, wound and infectious problems. CONCLUSIONS: Noncomplicated LA was associated with a higher hospitalization cost. There was no difference with regard to complicated cases. The incidence of complications increased in the OA group.
