ABSTRACT
CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) are recommended in patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer (ABC). Up to now, no prognostic biomarkers have been identified in this setting. We retrospectively analyzed the expression of progesterone receptor (PR) and Ki67, assessed by immunohistochemistry, in 71 ABC patients treated with CDK4/6i and analyzed the impact of these markers on progression-free survival (PFS). The majority of patients 63/71 (88.7%) received palbociclib, 4 (5.6%) received ribociclib, and 4 (5.6%) received abemaciclib. A higher median value of Ki67 was observed in cases undergoing second-line treatment (p = 0.047), whereas the luminal B subtype was more prevalent (p = 0.005). In the univariate analysis of the first-line setting, luminal A subtype showed a trend towards a correlation with a longer PFS (p = 0.053). A higher continuous Ki67 value led to a significantly shorter PFS. When the interaction between pathological characteristics and line of treatment was considered, luminal B subtype showed a significantly (p = 0.043) worse outcome (Hazard Ratio (HR) 2.84; 1.03-7.82 95% Confidence Interval (CI)). PFS in patients undergoing endocrine therapy plus CDK4/6i was inversely correlated with Ki67 expression but not with PR, suggesting that tumor proliferation has a greater impact on cell cycle inhibitors combined with endocrine therapy than PR expression.
ABSTRACT
Triple-negative breast cancers are characterized by the triple-negative (ER/PgR/Her2 negative) phenotype, are frequently associated with BRCA gene mutation, and are not candidate to currently available endocrine and HER2-targeted treatments. MGMT is involved in direct DNA repair exerted by cleavage of mutagenic alkyl adducts within DNA, and its epigenetic silencing confers susceptibility to DNA-damaging alkylating agents in glioblastomas and melanomas. MGMT methylation status has not been extensively investigated in breast cancer patients. The goal of our study was to evaluate the MGMT methylation status in TNBC patients, for most of which BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutational status was known. We evaluated MGMT methylation status by methylation-specific PCR (MSP) in formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tumor specimens from 92 TNBC patients. By using the GelDoc system (Biorad) software, the cases were further classified as follows: 0 (absence of methylated signal), 1 (prevalence of unmethylated signal, U/M ratio>1), 2 (prevalence of methylated signal, U/M ratio<1), and 3 (absence of unmethylated signal). MSP products were obtained in 89 (96.7%) of the cases. Overall, 15 (16.9%) cases were classified as 0, 33 (37.1%) cases as 1, 39 (43.8%) cases as 2, and 2 (2.2%) cases as 3. The 48 cases classified as 0 and 1 were considered as MGMT unmethylated, and the 41 cases classified as 2 and 3 as MGMT methylated. The prevalence of MGMT methylation in patients with BRCA1 mutated, wild-type, and unknown was 30.2% (13/43), 63.6% (14/22), and 58.3% (14/24), respectively. MGMT methylation was unrelated to the main clinical pathological characteristics, with the exception of a weak association with advanced age. In conclusion, our data suggest that in TNBC with wild-type BRCA1, the direct DNA repair system may be frequently (63.6%) silenced by MGMT methylation. The evaluation of the MGMT status could offer a new adjunct in predicting tumor response to alkylating drugs in TNBC patients.
