ABSTRACT
Cardiovascular manifestations of tertiary syphilis infections are uncommon, but represent an important cause of mortality and morbidity. Syphilitic aortitis is characterized by aortic regurgitation, dilatation of ascending aorta and ostial coronary artery lesions. We report a case of 36 years old man admitted to our hospital for acute anterior ST segment elevation myocardial infarction complicated with cardiogenic shock (hypotension 75/50 mmHg). Transthoracic echocardiography revealed a dilated left ventricle with severe systolic dysfunction (ejection fraction = 25%), severe mitral regurgitation, moderate aortic regurgitation and mildly dilated ascending aorta. Coronary angiography showed a severe ostial lesion of left main coronary artery which was treated by urgent stent implantation and an intra-aortic contrapulsation balloon was implanted. Blood tests for syphilitic infection were positive. The patient was discharged with treatment including benzathine penicillin. In our case, we present an acute manifestation of a syphilitic ostial left main stenosis treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction. Long term follow-up of the patient is crucial as a result of potential rapid in-stent restenosis caused by continuous infection of the ascending aorta. This case is particular because it shows that syphilitic aortitis can be diagnosed in acute settings, like ST segment elevation myocardial infarction.
Subject(s)
Coronary Stenosis/complications , Myocardial Infarction/etiology , Syphilis, Cardiovascular/complications , Adult , Aortic Valve Insufficiency/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Valve Insufficiency/etiology , Coronary Angiography , Coronary Stenosis/diagnostic imaging , Electrocardiography , Humans , Male , Mitral Valve Insufficiency/diagnostic imaging , Mitral Valve Insufficiency/etiology , Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis , Syphilis, Cardiovascular/diagnosis , UltrasonographyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Use of qualitative assessment of coronary artery flow (TIMI), although widely spread, represents a subjective method, a quantitative assessment (CTFC) being necessary in order to standardize and facilitate comparisons and communications of angiographic trials. This study aims at appreciating whether myocardial infarction represents a global phenomenon that affects the whole myocardium, also affecting the coronary artery flow in non-culprit arteries. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 66 patients that underwent primary PCI with stent and 66 patients with normal angiographic coronary arteries were studied. The number of frames necessary for the dye to reach certain standardized landmarks was registered, in order to objectively assess the coronary artery flow as a continuous variable. The statistical evaluations revealed that the quantitative assessment of the coronary flow through CTFC (corrected TIMI frame count) pins up a difference between the flow on non-culprit coronary arteries (23.54+/-9.235) and the flow on normal angiographic coronary arteries (17.46+/-4.1) (p<0.005), the result being also valid for each of the three coronary arteries separately analyzed: LAD (23.88+/-8.08 vs. 18.575+/-4.59 - p<0.005), CX (20.7+/-7.34 vs. 15.62+/-3.35 - p<0.005) and RCA (26.45+/-11.91 vs. 18.2+/-3.69 - p<0.005). CONCLUSIONS: There are significant differences regarding the flow on non-culprit coronary arteries in patients that suffered acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and the flow on the coronary arteries of the patients with normal angiographic results; these data might be the expression of global myocardial suffering.
