Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Nat Struct Mol Biol ; 18(6): 693-700, 2011 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21572446

ABSTRACT

Cell adhesion by classical cadherins is mediated by dimerization of their EC1 domains through the 'swapping' of N-terminal ß-strands. We use molecular simulations, measurements of binding affinities and X-ray crystallography to provide a detailed picture of the structural and energetic factors that control the adhesive dimerization of cadherins. We show that strand swapping in EC1 is driven by conformational strain in cadherin monomers that arises from the anchoring of their short N-terminal strand at one end by the conserved Trp2 and at the other by ligation to Ca(2+) ions. We also demonstrate that a conserved proline-proline motif functions to avoid the formation of an overly tight interface where affinity differences between different cadherins, crucial at the cellular level, are lost. We use these findings to design site-directed mutations that transform a monomeric EC2-EC3 domain cadherin construct into a strand-swapped dimer.


Subject(s)
Cadherins/chemistry , Cadherins/metabolism , Protein Multimerization , Amino Acid Sequence , Animals , Cadherins/genetics , Calcium/metabolism , Cations, Divalent/metabolism , Crystallography, X-Ray , Mice , Models, Chemical , Models, Molecular , Molecular Dynamics Simulation , Molecular Sequence Data , Mutagenesis, Site-Directed , Mutant Proteins/chemistry , Mutant Proteins/genetics , Mutant Proteins/metabolism , Protein Binding , Protein Conformation
2.
Nat Struct Mol Biol ; 17(3): 339-47, 2010 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20190755

ABSTRACT

Vertebrate genomes encode 19 classical cadherins and about 100 nonclassical cadherins. Adhesion by classical cadherins depends on binding interactions in their N-terminal EC1 domains, which swap N-terminal beta-strands between partner molecules from apposing cells. However, strand-swapping sequence signatures are absent from nonclassical cadherins, raising the question of how these proteins function in adhesion. Here, we show that T-cadherin, a glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored cadherin, forms dimers through an alternative nonswapped interface near the EC1-EC2 calcium-binding sites. Mutations within this interface ablate the adhesive capacity of T-cadherin. These nonadhesive T-cadherin mutants also lose the ability to regulate neurite outgrowth from T-cadherin-expressing neurons. Our findings reveal the likely molecular architecture of the T-cadherin homophilic interface and its requirement for axon outgrowth regulation. The adhesive binding mode used by T-cadherin may also be used by other nonclassical cadherins.


Subject(s)
Cadherins/chemistry , Cadherins/metabolism , Animals , Calcium/metabolism , Cells, Cultured , Chickens , Crystallography, X-Ray , Mice , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Mice, Knockout , Mice, Transgenic , Mutation , Neurons/metabolism , Neurons/physiology , Protein Binding/genetics , Protein Binding/physiology , Protein Multimerization/genetics , Protein Multimerization/physiology , Protein Structure, Secondary , Rats , Rats, Sprague-Dawley
3.
J Mol Biol ; 378(4): 954-68, 2008 May 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18395225

ABSTRACT

Cadherins are cell surface adhesion proteins important for tissue development and integrity. Type I and type II, or classical, cadherins form adhesive dimers via an interface formed through the exchange, or "swapping", of the N-terminal beta-strands from their membrane-distal EC1 domains. Here, we ask which sequence and structural features in EC1 domains are responsible for beta-strand swapping and whether members of other cadherin families form similar strand-swapped binding interfaces. We created a comprehensive database of multiple alignments of each type of cadherin domain. We used the known three-dimensional structures of classical cadherins to identify conserved positions in multiple sequence alignments that appear to be crucial determinants of the cadherin domain structure. We identified features that are unique to EC1 domains. On the basis of our analysis, we conclude that all cadherin domains have very similar overall folds but, with the exception of classical and desmosomal cadherin EC1 domains, most of them do not appear to bind through a strand-swapping mechanism. Thus, non-classical cadherins that function in adhesion are likely to use different protein-protein interaction interfaces. Our results have implications for the evolution of molecular mechanisms of cadherin-mediated adhesion in vertebrates.


Subject(s)
Cadherins/chemistry , Adhesiveness , Amino Acid Sequence , Cadherins/classification , Cadherins/metabolism , Conserved Sequence , Models, Molecular , Molecular Sequence Data , Protein Folding , Protein Structure, Quaternary , Protein Structure, Tertiary , Sequence Alignment
4.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ; 105(6): 1873-8, 2008 Feb 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18250328

ABSTRACT

Neuroligins (NLs) are catalytically inactive members of a family of cholinesterase-like transmembrane proteins that mediate cell adhesion at neuronal synapses. Postsynaptic neuroligins engage in Ca2+-dependent transsynaptic interactions via their extracellular cholinesterase domain with presynaptic neurexins (NRXs). These interactions may be regulated by two short splice insertions (termed A and B) in the NL cholinesterase domain. Here, we present the 3.3-A crystal structure of the ectodomain from NL2 containing splice insertion A (NL2A). The overall structure of NL2A resembles that of cholinesterases, but several structural features are unique to the NL proteins. First, structural elements surrounding the esterase active-site region differ significantly between active esterases and NL2A. On the opposite surface of the NL2A molecule, the positions of the A and B splice insertions identify a candidate NRX interaction site of the NL protein. Finally, sequence comparisons of NL isoforms allow for mapping the location of residues of previously identified mutations in NL3 and NL4 found in patients with autism spectrum disorders. Overall, the NL2 structure promises to provide a valuable model for dissecting NL isoform- and synapse-specific functions.


Subject(s)
Cholinesterases/chemistry , Membrane Proteins/chemistry , Nerve Tissue Proteins/chemistry , Alternative Splicing , Animals , Binding Sites , Cell Adhesion Molecules, Neuronal , Cell Line , Crystallography, X-Ray , Dimerization , Humans , Mice , Models, Molecular , Protein Conformation
5.
Genetics ; 173(1): 131-49, 2006 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16547101

ABSTRACT

Functional left/right asymmetry ("laterality") is a fundamental feature of many nervous systems, but only very few molecular correlates to functional laterality are known. At least two classes of chemosensory neurons in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans are functionally lateralized. The gustatory neurons ASE left (ASEL) and ASE right (ASER) are two bilaterally symmetric neurons that sense distinct chemosensory cues and express a distinct set of four known chemoreceptors of the guanylyl cyclase (gcy) gene family. To examine the extent of lateralization of gcy gene expression patterns in the ASE neurons, we have undertaken a genomewide analysis of all gcy genes. We report the existence of a total of 27 gcy genes encoding receptor-type guanylyl cyclases and of 7 gcy genes encoding soluble guanylyl cyclases in the complete genome sequence of C. elegans. We describe the expression pattern of all previously uncharacterized receptor-type guanylyl cyclases and find them to be highly biased but not exclusively restricted to the nervous system. We find that >41% (11/27) of all receptor-type guanylyl cyclases are expressed in the ASE gustatory neurons and that one-third of all gcy genes (9/27) are expressed in a lateral, left/right asymmetric manner in the ASE neurons. The expression of all laterally expressed gcy genes is under the control of a gene regulatory network composed of several transcription factors and miRNAs. The complement of gcy genes in the related nematode C. briggsae differs from C. elegans as evidenced by differences in chromosomal localization, number of gcy genes, and expression patterns. Differences in gcy expression patterns in the ASE neurons of C. briggsae arise from a difference in cis-regulatory elements and trans-acting factors that control ASE laterality. In sum, our results indicate the existence of a surprising multitude of putative chemoreceptors in the gustatory ASE neurons and suggest the existence of a substantial degree of laterality in gustatory signaling mechanisms in nematodes.


Subject(s)
Body Patterning/genetics , Caenorhabditis elegans/enzymology , Caenorhabditis elegans/genetics , Genome, Helminth/genetics , Neurons/metabolism , Receptors, Guanylate Cyclase-Coupled/genetics , Alleles , Animals , Caenorhabditis elegans/cytology , Chromosomes/genetics , Evolution, Molecular , Gene Expression Profiling , Gene Expression Regulation , Genes, Helminth/genetics , Genes, Reporter , Genomics , Mutation/genetics , Phylogeny , Receptors, Guanylate Cyclase-Coupled/chemistry , Sequence Homology, Nucleic Acid , Species Specificity , Synteny/genetics
6.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ; 102(24): 8531-6, 2005 Jun 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15937105

ABSTRACT

Cadherins constitute a family of cell-surface proteins that mediate intercellular adhesion through the association of protomers presented from juxtaposed cells. Differential cadherin expression leads to highly specific intercellular interactions in vivo. This cell-cell specificity is difficult to understand at the molecular level because individual cadherins within a given subfamily are highly similar to each other both in sequence and structure, and they dimerize with remarkably low binding affinities. Here, we provide a molecular model that accounts for these apparently contradictory observations. The model is based in part on the fact that cadherins bind to one another by "swapping" the N-terminal beta-strands of their adhesive domains. An inherent feature of strand swapping (or, more generally, the domain swapping phenomenon) is that "closed" monomeric conformations act as competitive inhibitors of dimer formation, thus lowering affinities even when the dimer interface has the characteristics of high-affinity complexes. The model describes quantitatively how small affinity differences between low-affinity cadherin dimers are amplified by multiple cadherin interactions to establish large specificity effects at the cellular level. It is shown that cellular specificity would not be observed if cadherins bound with high affinities, thus emphasizing the crucial role of strand swapping in cell-cell adhesion. Numerical estimates demonstrate that the strength of cellular adhesion is extremely sensitive to the concentration of cadherins expressed at the cell surface. We suggest that the domain swapping mechanism is used by a variety of cell-adhesion proteins and that related mechanisms to control affinity and specificity are exploited in other systems.


Subject(s)
Cadherins/metabolism , Cell Adhesion/physiology , Models, Molecular , Protein Structure, Secondary/physiology , Amino Acid Sequence , Dimerization , Molecular Sequence Data , Protein Binding , Protein Structure, Tertiary , Sequence Alignment
7.
J Mol Biol ; 334(5): 1043-62, 2003 Dec 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14643665

ABSTRACT

Structural alignments often reveal relationships between proteins that cannot be detected using sequence alignment alone. However, profile search methods based entirely on structural alignments alone have not been found to be effective in finding remote homologs. Here, we explore the role of structural information in remote homolog detection and sequence alignment. To this end, we develop a series of hybrid multidimensional alignment profiles that combine sequence, secondary and tertiary structure information into hybrid profiles. Sequence-based profiles are profiles whose position-specific scoring matrix is derived from sequence alignment alone; structure-based profiles are those derived from multiple structure alignments. We compare pure sequence-based profiles to pure structure-based profiles, as well as to hybrid profiles that use combined sequence-and-structure-based profiles, where sequence-based profiles are used in loop/motif regions and structural information is used in core structural regions. All of the hybrid methods offer significant improvement over simple profile-to-profile alignment. We demonstrate that both sequence-based and structure-based profiles contribute to remote homology detection and alignment accuracy, and that each contains some unique information. We discuss the implications of these results for further improvements in amino acid sequence and structural analysis.


Subject(s)
Proteins/chemistry , Sequence Alignment , Amino Acid Sequence , Molecular Sequence Data , Protein Conformation , Protein Folding , Sequence Homology, Amino Acid
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...