C5a receptor inhibitor avacopan in immunoglobulin A nephropathy-an open-label pilot study.

Background: Improvement of proteinuria as a marker for disease activity is associated with a better renal outcome in immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN). Complement is an effector pathway in IgA-mediated kidney injury. Avacopan, a selective C5a receptor inhibitor, has previously shown efficacy in anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of avacopan in patients with IgAN with persistent proteinuria despite a maximally tolerated dose of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockade. The efficacy evaluation was based on the change in proteinuria. Methods: This open-label pilot trial enrolled adult patients with biopsy-proven IgAN, urinary protein:creatinine ratio (UPCR) >1 g/g creatinine and an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) >60 mL/min/1.73 m2 or >45 mL/min/1.73 m2 if eGFR has not declined >10 mL/min/1.73 m2 over the previous 24 weeks. If the UPCR remained at >1 g/g creatinine after an 8-week run-in period, patients started avacopan 30 mg twice daily. The primary efficacy endpoint was the change in the slope of the UPCR from the 8-week run-in period to the slope in the 12-week avacopan dosing period. Results: A total of 10 of 15 screened patients entered the run-in period. Seven patients with a UPCR >1 g/g creatinine received avacopan. Six of seven patients had numerical improvement in the UPCR during the avacopan treatment period, three of whom had a numerical improvement of ∼50% at week 12. At week 24, five of seven patients still showed numerical improvement in the UPCR compared with baseline. The urinary monocyte chemoattractant protein-1:creatinine ratio decreased numerically 30% by week 8, possibly reflecting the anti-inflammatory activity of avacopan. Avacopan was well tolerated. There was one serious adverse event of unstable angina, which was deemed to be unrelated to avacopan. Conclusions: This short-term pilot study showed an improvement in the slope of the UPCR, with ∼50% improvement in three of seven patients with IgAN. Longer avacopan treatment duration may be indicated for maximal benefit.

Adjunctive Treatment With Avacopan, an Oral C5a Receptor Inhibitor, in Patients With Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the safety of avacopan, an orally administered C5a receptor inhibitor, for the treatment of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis in addition to standard-of-care (SOC) treatment with glucocorticoids with cyclophosphamide or rituximab. METHODS: In this randomized 12-week study, twice daily avacopan (10 mg or 30 mg) plus SOC was assessed versus SOC only in patients with newly diagnosed/relapsing ANCA-associated vasculitis. Efficacy measurements included 50% or greater reduction in Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score (BVAS) at day 85, rapid reduction (day 29) of BVAS to a score of 0 that was sustained through day 85, change in Vasculitis Damage Index (VDI), renal response (improvement in estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR], hematuria, and albuminuria), and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). RESULTS: Forty-two patients were randomized (n = 13 SOC, n = 13 avacopan 10 mg, and n = 16 avacopan 30 mg). Serious adverse events occurred in 15% and 17% of patients receiving SOC only and patients receiving avacopan with SOC, respectively. In the intent-to-treat population, BVAS response was high across arms (11 of 13 SOC, 11 of 12 avacopan 10 mg, and 12 of 15 avacopan 30 mg); increases in mean VDI were greater with SOC only than with avacopan plus SOC (0.3 versus 0.1). Avacopan 30 mg was numerically superior to placebo and avacopan 10 mg in early remission (15%, 8%, and 20% for SOC only, avacopan 10 mg, and avacopan 30 mg, respectively), improved eGFR (+2.0 ml/min/1.73m2 , +1.3 ml/min/1.73m2 , and +6.2 ml/min/1.73m2 , respectively), renal response (17%, 40%, and 63%, respectively), and measures of HRQoL. CONCLUSION: Avacopan in addition to SOC for ANCA-associated vasculitis was well tolerated, and at the higher study dose, it appeared to improve time to remission (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02222155).

Randomized Trial of C5a Receptor Inhibitor Avacopan in ANCA-Associated Vasculitis.

Alternative C activation is involved in the pathogenesis of ANCA-associated vasculitis. However, glucocorticoids used as treatment contribute to the morbidity and mortality of vasculitis. We determined whether avacopan (CCX168), an orally administered, selective C5a receptor inhibitor, could replace oral glucocorticoids without compromising efficacy. In this randomized, placebo-controlled trial, adults with newly diagnosed or relapsing vasculitis received placebo plus prednisone starting at 60 mg daily (control group), avacopan (30 mg, twice daily) plus reduced-dose prednisone (20 mg daily), or avacopan (30 mg, twice daily) without prednisone. All patients received cyclophosphamide or rituximab. The primary efficacy measure was the proportion of patients achieving a ≥50% reduction in Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score by week 12 and no worsening in any body system. We enrolled 67 patients, 23 in the control and 22 in each of the avacopan groups. Clinical response at week 12 was achieved in 14 of 20 (70.0%) control patients, 19 of 22 (86.4%) patients in the avacopan plus reduced-dose prednisone group (difference from control 16.4%; two-sided 90% confidence limit, -4.3% to 37.1%; P=0.002 for noninferiority), and 17 of 21 (81.0%) patients in the avacopan without prednisone group (difference from control 11.0%; two-sided 90% confidence limit, -11.0% to 32.9%; P=0.01 for noninferiority). Adverse events occurred in 21 of 23 (91%) control patients, 19 of 22 (86%) patients in the avacopan plus reduced-dose prednisone group, and 21 of 22 (96%) patients in the avacopan without prednisone group. In conclusion, C5a receptor inhibition with avacopan was effective in replacing high-dose glucocorticoids in treating vasculitis.

The effect of CCR2 inhibitor CCX140-B on residual albuminuria in patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy: a randomised trial.

BACKGROUND: Patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy have high cardiorenal morbidity and mortality despite optimum treatment including angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs). Residual risk is related to residual albuminuria. We assessed whether CCX140-B, a selective inhibitor of C-C chemokine receptor type 2 (CCR2), could further reduce albuminuria when given in addition to standard care, including ACE inhibitors or ARBs. METHODS: In this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial, we recruited patients from 78 research centres in Belgium, Czech Republic, Germany, Hungary, Poland, and the UK. We enrolled patients with type 2 diabetes aged 18-75 years with proteinuria (first morning void urinary albumin to creatinine ratio [UACR] 100-3000 mg/g), estimated glomerular filtration rate of 25 mL/min per 1·73 m(2) or higher, and taking stable antidiabetic treatment and ACE inhibitors or ARBs, for at least 8 weeks before study entry. Patients were stratified based on baseline UACR and renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate), and then randomly assigned (1:1:1) via an interactive web response system with a minimisation algorithm to oral placebo, 5 mg CCX140-B, or 10 mg CCX140-B once a day. The 12-week dosing period in the initial protocol was extended to 52 weeks by protocol amendment. The primary efficacy measure was change from baseline in UACR during 52 weeks in the modified intention-to-treat population (all patients with uninterrupted dosing, excluding patients who stopped dosing at week 12 either permanently under the original protocol, or temporarily because of delay in approval of the protocol amendment). We did safety analyses on all randomly assigned patients who received at least one dose of study drug. According to a prespecified analysis plan, we analysed the primary endpoint with one-sided statistical testing with calculation of upper 95% confidence limits of the differences between active and control. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01447147. FINDINGS: The study ran from Dec 7, 2011 (first patient enrolled), until Aug 4, 2014. We enrolled 332 patients: 111 were assigned to receive placebo, 110 to 5 mg CCX140-B, and 111 to 10 mg CCX140-B. Of these, 192 were included in the modified intention-to-treat population. UACR changes from baseline during 52 weeks were -2% for placebo (95% CI -11% to 9%), -18% for 5 mg CCX140-B (-26% to -8%), and -11% for 10 mg CCX140-B (-20% to -1%). We recorded a -16% difference between 5 mg CCX140-B and placebo (one-sided upper 95% confidence limit -5%; p=0·01) and a -10% difference between 10 mg CCX140-B and placebo (upper 95% confidence limit 2%; p=0·08). Adverse events occurred in 81 (73%) of 111 patients in the placebo group versus 71 (65%) of 110 patients in the CCX140-B 5 mg group and 68 (61%) of 111 patients in the CCX140-B 10 mg group; there were no renal events during the study. INTERPRETATION: Our data suggest that CCR2 inhibition with CCX140-B has renoprotective effects on top of current standard of care in patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy. FUNDING: ChemoCentryx.