Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
1.
Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol ; 47(3): 102093, 2023 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36764389

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening using fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) aims to detect pre-symptomatic colorectal lesions and reduce CRC mortality. AIMS: The objectives of this study were to determine the FIT sensitivity for diagnosis of CRC, the impact of diagnostic circumstances on treatment and survival, and risk factors for interval cancer (IC). METHODS: This population-based study evaluated the 2016-2017 CRC screening campaign in Finistère, France. CRCs were classified according to diagnostic circumstances: screen-detected CRC (SD-CRC), CRC with delayed diagnosis, IC after negative FIT (FIT-IC), post-colonoscopy CRC, CRC in non-responders and CRC in the excluded population. RESULTS: This study included 909 CRCs: 248 SD-CRCs (6% of positive FIT) and 60 FIT-ICs (0.07% of negative FIT). The FIT sensitivity for CRC was 80.5% (CI95%: 76.1-84.9) at the threshold of 30 µg hemoglobin/g feces used in France. In multivariate analysis, proximal (OR:6.73) and rectal locations (OR:7.52) were associated with being diagnosed with FIT-IC rather than SD-CRC. The FIT positivity threshold maximizing the sum of sensitivity and specificity was found to be 17 µg/g, with 14 additional CRCs diagnosed compared to the current threshold. CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirms the good sensitivity of FIT. A decrease of the FIT detection threshold could optimize sensitivity.


Subject(s)
Colonoscopy , Colorectal Neoplasms , Humans , Sensitivity and Specificity , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Feces , Occult Blood , Early Detection of Cancer , Risk Factors , Mass Screening
2.
Bull Cancer ; 109(7-8): 768-779, 2022.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35599171

ABSTRACT

Second reading is an important part of breast cancer organized screening program. Image quality control and detection of non-diagnosed cancer by first reader are the two goals of this process. In France, 6 % of all screening cancer are diagnosed by second reading, actually done on screen film. With the technologic evolution (Digital breast tomosynthesis, Artificial intelligence) and societal digitalization, this process need to evolve. After some report about organization and results for second reading in France and outside, current and future shortcomings, proposition from professionals involved in breast cancer screening are made to improve this public health program.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Early Detection of Cancer , Artificial Intelligence , Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Breast Neoplasms/prevention & control , Early Detection of Cancer/methods , Female , Humans , Mammography/methods , Mass Screening/methods , Reading
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...