Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 60
Filter
1.
Cancer Causes Control ; 12(8): 755-61, 2001 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11562116

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationship between cumulative lifetime exposure to diagnostic radiation and the risk of multiple myeloma using data from a large, multi-center, population-based case-control study. METHODS: Study subjects included a total of 540 cases with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma and 1998 frequency-matched population controls living in three areas of the United States (Georgia, Michigan, New Jersey). Information on exposure to diagnostic X-rays was obtained by personal interview. RESULTS: No association was found between case-control status and the total number of reported diagnostic X-rays of any type (odds ratio (OR) for 20 or more compared to less than 5 X-rays = 0.9, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) = 0.7-1.2). There was no evidence of an excess risk of multiple myeloma among individuals who reported exposure to 10 or more diagnostic X-rays that impart a relatively high radiation dose to the bone marrow, as compared to individuals reporting no such exposures (OR 0.7, 95% CI 0.4-1.3). CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that exposure to diagnostic X-rays has a negligible impact, if any, on risk of developing multiple myeloma.


Subject(s)
Multiple Myeloma/etiology , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/etiology , Adult , Aged , Case-Control Studies , Confidence Intervals , Georgia/epidemiology , Humans , Michigan/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Multiple Myeloma/epidemiology , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/epidemiology , New Jersey/epidemiology , Odds Ratio , Risk Factors
2.
Cancer Causes Control ; 12(2): 117-25, 2001 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11246840

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To explore whether dietary factors contribute to the risk of multiple myeloma and the two-fold higher incidence among blacks compared to whites in the United States. METHODS: Data from a food-frequency questionnaire were analyzed for 346 white and 193 black subjects with multiple myeloma, and 1086 white and 903 black controls who participated in a population-based case-control study of multiple myeloma in three areas of the United States. RESULTS: Elevated risks were associated with obese vs. normal weight (OR = 1.9, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.2-3.1 for whites and OR = 1.5, 95% CI = 0.9-2.4 for blacks), while the frequency of obesity was greater for black than white controls. Reduced risks were related to frequent intake of cruciferous vegetables (OR = 0.7, 95% CI = 0.6-0.99) and fish (OR = 0.7, 95% CI = 0.5-0.9) in both races combined, and to vitamin C supplements in whites (OR = 0.6, 95% CI = 0.5-0.9) and blacks (OR = 0.8, 95% CI = 0.5-1.4), with the frequency of vitamin supplement use being greater for white than black controls. However, frequent intake of vitamin C from food and supplements combined was associated with a protective effect in whites (OR = 0.6, 95% CI = 0.4-0.9), but not blacks (OR = 1.2, 95% CI = 0.8-2.1). CONCLUSIONS: The greater use of vitamin C supplements by whites and the higher frequency of obesity among blacks may explain part of the higher incidence of multiple myeloma among blacks compared to whites in the United States. In addition, the increasing prevalence of obesity may have contributed to the upward trend in the incidence of multiple myeloma during recent decades.


Subject(s)
Black People , Diet/adverse effects , Multiple Myeloma/ethnology , Nutritional Status , Obesity/epidemiology , White People , Adult , Age Distribution , Aged , Body Mass Index , Case-Control Studies , Comorbidity , Confidence Intervals , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Multiple Myeloma/etiology , Population Surveillance , Risk Factors , Sex Distribution , United States/epidemiology
3.
Am J Epidemiol ; 153(2): 114-22, 2001 Jan 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11159155

ABSTRACT

Data from a population-based case-control study were used to evaluate the relation between social class factors and squamous cell esophageal cancer and the extent to which alcohol, tobacco, diet, and low income contribute to the higher incidence among Black men than among White men in the United States. A total of 347 male cases (119 White, 228 Black) and 1,354 male controls (743 White, 611 Black) were selected from three US geographic areas (Atlanta, Georgia, Detroit, Michigan, and New Jersey). Cases were residents of the study areas aged 30-79 years who had been diagnosed with histologically confirmed esophageal cancer between 1986 and 1989. The adjusted odds ratios for subjects with annual incomes less than $10,000 versus incomes of $25,000 or more were 4.3 (95% confidence interval: 2.1, 8.7) for Whites and 8.0 (95% confidence interval: 4.3, 15.0) for Blacks. The combination of all four major risk factors-low income, moderate/heavy alcohol intake, tobacco use, and infrequent consumption of raw fruits and vegetables-accounted for almost all of the squamous cell esophageal cancers in Whites (98%) and Blacks (99%) and for 99% of the excess incidence among Black men. Thus, lifestyle modifications, especially a lowered intake of alcoholic beverages, would markedly decrease the incidence of squamous cell esophageal cancer in both racial groups and would narrow the racial disparity in risk. Further studies on the determinants of social class may help to identify a new set of exposures for this tumor that are amenable to intervention.


Subject(s)
Black or African American/statistics & numerical data , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/ethnology , Esophageal Neoplasms/ethnology , Social Class , Adult , Aged , Alcohol Drinking/adverse effects , Case-Control Studies , Diet/adverse effects , Georgia/epidemiology , Humans , Incidence , Life Style , Male , Michigan/epidemiology , Middle Aged , New Jersey/epidemiology , Odds Ratio , Population Surveillance , Poverty/ethnology , Risk Factors , Sex Distribution , Smoking/adverse effects , White People/statistics & numerical data
4.
Am J Ind Med ; 39(1): 92-9, 2001 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11148019

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: An increased risk of exposure to pesticides for pancreatic cancer has been suggested in a number of epidemiologic studies. METHODS: Cases (N = 484), aged 30-79 years, were diagnosed in 1986-1989. Controls (N = 2,095) were a random sample of the general population. Information on usual occupation and potential confounding factors was obtained. A job-exposure matrix (JEM) approach was used to estimate the level of occupational exposure to pesticides. RESULTS: A significant trend in risk with increasing exposure level of pesticides was observed, with ORs of 1.3 and 1.4 for low and moderate/high exposure levels, respectively. Excess risks were found for occupational exposure to fungicides (OR = 1.5) and herbicides (OR = 1.6) in the moderate/high level after adjustment for potential confounding factors. An increased risk for insecticide exposure was disappeared after adjustment for fungicide and herbicide exposures. Results of our occupation-based analysis were consistent with those from the JEM-based analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that pesticides may increase risk of pancreatic cancer, and indicate the need for investigations that can evaluate risk by specific chemical exposures. Published 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.


Subject(s)
Occupational Diseases/chemically induced , Occupational Exposure , Pancreatic Neoplasms/chemically induced , Pesticides/adverse effects , Adult , Aged , Black People , Case-Control Studies , Confidence Intervals , Confounding Factors, Epidemiologic , Female , Fungicides, Industrial/adverse effects , Herbicides/adverse effects , Humans , Insecticides/adverse effects , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Odds Ratio , Population Surveillance , Risk Factors , White People
5.
Ann Epidemiol ; 10(7): 468, 2000 Oct 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11018394

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To investigate the relationship between social class factors and squamous cell esophageal cancer and the extent to which alcohol, tobacco, diet, and social class contribute to the five-fold higher incidence among black than white men in the United States.METHODS: Interviews were conducted with 347 incident cases of squamous cell esophageal cancer (119 white males and 228 black males) and 1354 population-based controls (743 white males and 611 black males) from Atlanta, Detroit, and New Jersey. Risks were estimated using unconditional logistic regression controlling for potential confounders.RESULTS: Elevated risks of squamous cell esophageal cancer were associated with indicators of low social class, especially low annual income. The adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for subjects with incomes < $10,000 versus incomes of $25,000 or more were 4.3 (95% CI = 2.1-8.7) for whites and 8.0 (95% CI = 4.3-15.0) for blacks. The combination of all four major risk factors: annual income less than $25,000, moderate/heavy use of alcohol, use of tobacco for six months or longer, and consumption of less than 2.5 servings of raw fruits and vegetables per day accounted for almost all of the squamous cell esophageal cancers in whites (98%) and blacks (99%), and for 99% of the excess incidence among black men.CONCLUSIONS: Lifestyle modifications, especially a lower intake of alcoholic beverages, would markedly decrease the incidence of this cancer in both races and narrow the racial disparity in risk. Further studies into the determinants of social class may help identify a new set of exposures for this tumor that are amendable to intervention.

6.
Am J Public Health ; 90(8): 1277-81, 2000 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10937009

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study examined the relation between socioeconomic status (SES) and risk of multiple myeloma among Blacks and Whites in the United States. METHODS: This population-based case-control study included 573 cases (206 Blacks and 367 Whites) with new diagnoses of multiple myeloma identified between August 1, 1986, and April 30, 1989, and 2131 controls (967 Blacks and 1164 Whites) from 3 US geographic areas. Information on occupation, income, and education was obtained by personal interview. RESULTS: Inverse gradients in risk were associated with occupation-based SES, income, and education. Risks were significantly elevated for subjects in the lowest categories of occupation-based SES (odds ratio [OR] = 1.71, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.16, 2.53), education (OR = 1.36, 95% CI = 1.06, 1.75), and income (OR = 1.43, 95% CI = 1.05, 1.93). Occupation-based low SES accounted for 37% of multiple myeloma in Blacks and 17% in Whites, as well as 49% of the excess incidence in Blacks. Low education and low income accounted for 17% and 28% of the excess incidence in Blacks, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that the measured SES-related factors account for a substantial amount of the Black-White differential in multiple myeloma incidence.


Subject(s)
Black or African American/statistics & numerical data , Multiple Myeloma/epidemiology , Social Class , White People/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aged , Case-Control Studies , Female , Humans , Incidence , Interviews as Topic , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Population Surveillance , Risk Factors , United States/epidemiology
7.
Am J Epidemiol ; 151(6): 554-65, 2000 Mar 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10733037

ABSTRACT

Several studies have linked inhalation of airborne arsenic with increased risk of respiratory cancer, but few have analyzed the shape of the exposure-response curve. In addition, since inhaled airborne arsenic affects systemic levels of inhaled arsenic, there is concern that inhaled arsenic may be associated with cancers of the skin, bladder, kidney, and liver, which have been linked to ingested arsenic. The authors followed 8,014 white male workers who were employed for 12 months or more prior to 1957 at a Montana copper smelter from January 1, 1938 through December 31, 1989. A total of 4,930 (62%) were deceased, including 446 from respiratory cancer. Significantly increased standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) were found for all causes (SMR = 1.14), all cancers (SMR = 1.13), respiratory cancer (SMR = 1.55), diseases of the nervous system and sense organs (SMR = 1.31), nonmalignant respiratory diseases (SMR = 1.56), emphysema (SMR = 1.73), ill-defined conditions (SMR = 2.26), and external causes (SMR = 1.35). Internal analyses revealed a significant, linear increase in the excess relative risk of respiratory cancer with increasing exposure to inhaled airborne arsenic. The estimate of the excess relative risk per mg/m3-year was 0.21/(mg/m3-year) (95% confidence interval: 0.10, 0.46). No other cause of death was related to inhaled arsenic exposure.


Subject(s)
Air Pollutants, Occupational/adverse effects , Arsenic/adverse effects , Metallurgy , Occupational Diseases/mortality , Respiratory Tract Neoplasms/mortality , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Copper , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Montana/epidemiology , Regression Analysis , Risk , Sulfur Dioxide/adverse effects
8.
Maturitas ; 34(2): 109-12, 2000 Feb 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10714904

ABSTRACT

The Women's Health Initiative (WHI), established by the National Institutes of Health in 1991, is a long-term national health study that focuses on strategies for preventing heart disease, breast and colorectal cancer and osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. These chronic diseases are the major causes of death, disability and frailty in older women of all races and socioeconomic backgrounds. The WHI a 15-year multi-million dollar endeavor, and one of the largest U.S. prevention studies of its kind. The study involves over 161,000 women aged 50-79, and is one of the most definitive, far reaching clinical trials of women's health ever undertaken in the U.S. The WHI Clinical Trial and Observational Study will attempt to address many of the inequities in women's health research and provide practical information to women and their physicians about hormone replacement therapy, dietary patterns and calcium/vitamin D supplements, and their effects on the prevention of heart disease, cancer and osteoporosis. Emerging information from the NIH Women's Health Initiative and other studies of women's health begun in the 1990's should be changing the landscape of options for older women in the years to come.


Subject(s)
Health Promotion , Women's Health , Aged , Breast Neoplasms/prevention & control , Calcium, Dietary/administration & dosage , Cause of Death , Clinical Trials as Topic , Colonic Neoplasms/prevention & control , Diet , Dietary Supplements , Female , Financing, Government , Heart Diseases/prevention & control , Hormone Replacement Therapy , Humans , Middle Aged , National Institutes of Health (U.S.) , Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/prevention & control , Rectal Neoplasms/prevention & control , United States , Vitamin D/administration & dosage
9.
Br J Cancer ; 82(3): 718-25, 2000 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10682688

ABSTRACT

A population-based case-control study was carried out among 981 men (479 black, 502 white) with pathologically confirmed prostate cancer and 1315 controls (594 black, 721 white). In-person interviews elicited information on sexual behaviour and other potential risk factors for prostate cancer. Blood was drawn for serologic studies in a subset of the cases (n = 276) and controls (n = 295). Prostate cancer risk was increased among men who reported a history of gonorrhoea or syphilis (odds ratio (OR) = 1.6; 95% confidence internal (CI) 1.2-2.1) or showed serological evidence of syphilis (MHA-TP) (OR = 1.8; 95% CI 1.0-3.5). Patterns of risk for gonorrhoea and syphilis were similar for blacks (OR = 1.7; 95% CI 1.2-2.2) and whites (OR = 1.6; 95% CI 0.8-3.2). Risks increased with increasing occurrences of gonorrhoea, rising to OR = 3.3 (95% CI 1.4-7.8) among subjects with three or more events (Ptrend = 0.0005). Frequent sexual encounters with prostitutes and failure to use condoms were also associated with increased risk. Syphilis, gonorrhoea, sex with prostitutes and unprotected sexual intercourse may be indicators of contact with a sexually transmissible factor that increases the risk of prostate cancer.


Subject(s)
Prostatic Neoplasms/epidemiology , Sexual Behavior , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/epidemiology , Adult , Black or African American , Aged , Case-Control Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prostatic Neoplasms/complications , Risk Factors , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/complications , White People
10.
Br J Cancer ; 80(11): 1830-7, 1999 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10468306

ABSTRACT

In a population-based case-control study of pancreatic cancer conducted in three areas of the USA, 484 cases and 2099 controls were interviewed to evaluate the aetiologic role of several medical conditions/interventions, including diabetes mellitus, cholecystectomy, ulcer/gastrectomy and allergic states. We also evaluated risk associated with family history of cancer. Our findings support previous studies indicating that diabetes is a risk factor for pancreatic cancer, as well as a possible complication of the tumour. A significant positive trend in risk with increasing years prior to diagnosis of pancreatic cancer was apparent (P-value for test of trend = 0.016), with diabetics diagnosed at least 10 years prior to diagnosis having a significant 50% increased risk. Those treated with insulin had risks similar to those not treated with insulin (odds ratio (OR) = 1.6 and 1.5 respectively), and no trend in risk was associated with increasing duration of insulin treatment. Cholecystectomy also appeared to be a risk factor, as well as a consequence of the malignancy. Subjects with a cholecystectomy at least 20 years prior to the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer experienced a 70% increased risk, which was marginally significant. In contrast, subjects with a history of duodenal or gastric ulcer had little or no elevated risk (OR = 1.2; confidence interval = 0.9-1.6). Those treated by gastrectomy had the same risk as those not receiving surgery, providing little support for the hypothesis that gastrectomy is a risk factor for pancreatic cancer. A significant 40% reduced risk was associated with hay fever, a non-significant 50% decreased risk with allergies to animals, and a non-significant 40% reduced risk with allergies to dust/moulds. These associations, however, may be due to chance since no risk reductions were apparent for asthma or several other types of allergies. In addition, we observed significantly increased risks for subjects reporting a first-degree relative with cancers of the pancreas (OR = 3.2), colon (OR = 1.7) or ovary (OR = 5.3) and non-significantly increased risks for cancers of the endometrium (OR = 1.5) or breast (OR = 1.3). The pattern is consistent with the familial predisposition reported for pancreatic cancer and with the array of tumours associated with hereditary non-polyposis colon cancer.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Pancreatic Neoplasms/epidemiology , Adult , Aged , Case-Control Studies , Cholecystectomy/statistics & numerical data , Confidence Intervals , Female , Gastrectomy/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Hypersensitivity/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasms/etiology , Nuclear Family , Odds Ratio , Pancreatic Neoplasms/etiology , Pancreatic Neoplasms/genetics , Reference Values , Registries , Risk Factors , Smoking , Stomach Ulcer/epidemiology , United States/epidemiology
11.
Cancer ; 85(11): 2385-90, 1999 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10357409

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In the U.S., the incidence rate of multiple myeloma is more than twice as high for blacks as for whites, but the etiology of this malignancy is not well understood. METHODS: A population-based case-control interview study of 565 subjects (361 white, 204 black) with multiple myeloma and 2104 controls (1150 white, 954 black) living in 3 areas of the U.S. offered the opportunity to explore whether family history, of cancer contributes to the risk of multiple myeloma and explains the racial disparity in risk. RESULTS: For both races combined, the risk of multiple myeloma was significantly elevated for subjects who reported that a first-degree relative had multiple myeloma (odds ratio [OR] = 3.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.2-12.0). Increased risk was also associated with a family history of any hematolymphoproliferative (HLP) cancer (OR = 1.7, 95% CI = 1.0-2.8), especially in a sibling (OR = 2.3, 95% CI = 1.1-4.5). The risk associated with familial occurrence of HLP cancer was higher for blacks than for whites, but the difference between the ORs was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: These data are consistent with previous studies that indicate a familial risk of multiple myeloma, but they explain little of the race-related difference in incidence rates.


Subject(s)
Black People , Family Health , Multiple Myeloma/epidemiology , White People , Adult , Aged , Case-Control Studies , Humans , Incidence , Logistic Models , Middle Aged , Multiple Myeloma/etiology , Regression Analysis , Risk Factors , United States/epidemiology
12.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev ; 8(1): 25-34, 1999 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9950236

ABSTRACT

Prostate cancer is the most common malignancy in men in the United States, with substantially higher rates among American blacks than whites. We carried out a population-based case-control study in three geographic areas of the United States to evaluate the reasons for the racial disparity in incidence rates. A total of 932 men (449 black men and 483 white men) who had been newly diagnosed with pathologically confirmed prostate cancer and 1201 controls (543 black men and 658 white men) were interviewed in person to elicit information on potential risk factors. This report evaluates the impact of dietary factors, particularly the consumption of animal products and animal fat, on the risk of prostate cancer among blacks and whites in the United States. Increased consumption (grams/day) of foods high in animal fat was linked to prostate cancer (independent of intake of other calories) among American blacks [by quartile of intake, odds ratio (OR) = 1.0 (referent), 1.5, 2.1, and 2.0; Ptrend = 0.007], but not among American whites [by quartile of intake, OR = 1.0 (referent), 1.6, 1.5, and 1.1; Ptrend = 0.90]. However, risks for advanced prostate cancer were higher with greater intake of foods high in animal fat among blacks [by quartile of intake, OR = 1.0 (referent), 2.2, 4.2, and 3.1; Ptrend = 0.006] and whites [by quartile of intake, OR = 1.0 (referent), 2.2, 2.6, and 2.4; Ptrend = 0.02]. Increased intake of animal fat as a proportion of total caloric intake also showed positive but weaker associations with advanced prostate cancer among blacks (Ptrend = 0.13) and whites (Ptrend = 0.08). No clear associations were found with vitamin A, calcium, or specific lycopene-rich foods. The study linked greater consumption of fat from animal sources to increased risk for prostate cancer among American blacks and to advanced prostate cancer among American blacks and whites. A reduction of fat from animal sources in the diet could lead to decreased incidence and mortality rates for prostate cancer, particularly among American blacks.


Subject(s)
Black People , Feeding Behavior , Prostatic Neoplasms/etiology , White People , Adult , Black or African American , Aged , Animals , Antioxidants/administration & dosage , Calcium/administration & dosage , Carotenoids/administration & dosage , Case-Control Studies , Confidence Intervals , Dietary Fats/administration & dosage , Dietary Fats/adverse effects , Energy Intake , Humans , Incidence , Lycopene , Male , Meat , Middle Aged , Odds Ratio , Risk Factors , Survival Rate , United States , Vitamin A/administration & dosage
13.
J Natl Cancer Inst ; 90(22): 1710-9, 1998 Nov 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9827525

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The relationship between diet and pancreatic cancer remains unclear. In this study, we assessed the role of diet and nutrition as risk factors for pancreatic cancer, using data obtained from direct interviews only, rather than data from less reliable interviews with next of kin. We evaluated whether dietary factors could explain the higher incidence of pancreatic cancer experienced by black Americans compared with white Americans. METHODS: We conducted a population-based case-control study of pancreatic cancer diagnosed in Atlanta (GA), Detroit (MI), and 10 New Jersey counties from August 1986 through April 1989. Reliable dietary histories were obtained for 436 patients and 2003 general-population control subjects aged 30-79 years. RESULTS: Obesity was associated with a statistically significant 50%-60% increased risk of pancreatic cancer that was consistent by sex and race. Although the magnitude of risk associated with obesity was identical in blacks and whites, a higher percentage of blacks were obese than were whites (women: 38% versus 16%; men: 27% versus 22%). A statistically significant positive trend in risk was observed with increasing caloric intake, with subjects in the highest quartile of caloric intake experiencing a 70% higher risk than those in the lowest quartile. A statistically significant interaction between body mass index (weight in kg/height in m2 for men and weight in kg/height in m1.5 for women) and total caloric intake was observed that was consistent by sex and race. Subjects in the highest quartile of both body mass index and caloric intake had a statistically significant 180% higher risk than those in the lowest quartile. CONCLUSIONS: Obesity is a risk factor for pancreatic cancer and appears to contribute to the higher risk of this disease among blacks than among whites in the United States, particularly among women. Furthermore, the interaction between body mass index and caloric intake suggests the importance of energy balance in pancreatic carcinogenesis.


Subject(s)
Black or African American/statistics & numerical data , Diet/adverse effects , Food/adverse effects , Nutritional Physiological Phenomena , Pancreatic Neoplasms/ethnology , Pancreatic Neoplasms/etiology , White People/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aged , Body Mass Index , Case-Control Studies , Coffee , Dietary Fats , Energy Intake , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Odds Ratio , United States/epidemiology
14.
Scand J Work Environ Health ; 24 Suppl 2: 25-41, 1998.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9714511

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to evaluate the relationship between occupational exposure to acrylonitrile and cancer mortality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Workers (18079 white men, 4293 white women, 2191 nonwhite men, and 897 nonwhite women) employed in acrylonitrile production or use in the 1950s through 1983 were followed through 1989 for vital status and cause of death. Exposure-response relationships were evaluated from quantitative estimates of historical exposures. Tobacco use was determined for a sample of workers to assess potential confounding. Mortality rates between the exposed and unexposed workers in the cohort were compared using the Poisson regression. RESULTS: Analyses by cumulative, average, peak, intensity, duration, and lagged exposure revealed no elevated risk of cancers of the stomach, brain, breast, prostate or lymphatic and hematopoietic systems. Mortality from lung cancer was elevated for the highest quintile of cumulative exposure. When the decile categories were used, the relative risk did not continue to increase at higher levels. Adjustment for cigarette use reduced the risk for lung cancer only slightly. Separate analyses for wage and salaried workers, long-term and short-term workers, fiber and nonfiber plants, and individual plants revealed no clear exposure-response patterns. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that exposure to acrylonitrile at the levels studied is not associated with an increased relative risk for most cancers of a priori interest. The excess of lung cancer in the highest quintile of cumulative exposure may indicate carcinogenic activity at the highest levels of exposure, but analyses of exposure-response do not provide strong or consistent evidence for a causal association.


Subject(s)
Acrylonitrile/adverse effects , Cause of Death , Chemical Industry/statistics & numerical data , Neoplasms/chemically induced , Neoplasms/mortality , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Adult , Age Distribution , Aged , Case-Control Studies , Cohort Studies , Data Collection , Female , Humans , Incidence , Lung Neoplasms/chemically induced , Lung Neoplasms/diagnosis , Lung Neoplasms/mortality , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasms/diagnosis , Occupational Exposure/statistics & numerical data , Poisson Distribution , Regression Analysis , Risk Factors , Sex Distribution , Smoking/epidemiology , Survival Rate , United States/epidemiology
15.
Scand J Work Environ Health ; 24 Suppl 2: 42-53, 1998.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9714512

ABSTRACT

Procedures used to develop estimates of exposure to acrylonitrile for a cohort study (>25000 workers in 8 monomer, fiber, and resin companies from 1952 to 1983) are presented. Visits to the companies were made, interviews of workers were conducted, historical records were made, and measurements were taken. On the basis of similar tasks, locations, other exposures, and a similar distribution of exposures to acrylonitrile, 3600 exposure groups were formed. Special procedures were used to reduce the misclassification of workers performing tasks that varied in time but that were inadequately reflected in the job title. A software program organized and retained all exposure information on each exposure group. Quantitative estimates of acrylonitrile exposure were developed using a hierarchical approach in a software program that documented the derivation of each estimate and facilitated data review. Two of the estimation methods were evaluated in a comparison with measurement data.


Subject(s)
Acrylonitrile/analysis , Chemical Industry/statistics & numerical data , Environmental Monitoring/statistics & numerical data , Environmental Pollution/analysis , Occupational Exposure/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aged , Cohort Studies , Environmental Monitoring/methods , Environmental Pollution/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Occupational Health/statistics & numerical data , Occupations/statistics & numerical data , Quality Control , Risk Assessment , Sensitivity and Specificity , Time Factors , United States , Workplace/statistics & numerical data
16.
Cancer Causes Control ; 9(5): 467-74, 1998 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9934713

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To investigate dietary factors for squamous cell esophageal cancer and whether these factors may contribute to the five-fold higher incidence of this cancer in the black versus white population of the United States. METHODS: Data from a food frequency questionnaire were analyzed for 114 white men and 219 black men with squamous cell esophageal cancer, and 681 white and 557 black male controls from three areas of the United States who participated in a population-based case-control study of esophageal cancer. RESULTS: Protective effects were associated with intake of raw fruits and vegetables (odds ratio for high versus low consumers = 0.3 in both white and black men) and use of vitamin supplements (especially vitamin C; odds ratio for high versus low consumers = 0.4 in both races), with the frequency of consumption of raw fruits and vegetables and vitamin supplements being greater for white than black controls. In addition, elevated risks were associated with high versus low intake of red meat (OR = 2.7 for blacks and 1.5 for whites) and processed meat (OR = 1.6 for blacks and 1.7 for whites), with the levels of consumption being greater for black than white controls. CONCLUSIONS: In the United States, these dietary factors may contribute in part to the much higher incidence of squamous cell esophageal cancer among black compared to white men.


Subject(s)
Black People , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/ethnology , Diet , Esophageal Neoplasms/ethnology , White People , Adult , Aged , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/diagnosis , Case-Control Studies , Confidence Intervals , Esophageal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Fruit , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Odds Ratio , Risk Factors , United States/epidemiology , Vegetables
17.
Cancer Causes Control ; 8(4): 605-9, 1997 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9242476

ABSTRACT

To evaluate whether the fivefold greater incidence rate of squamous-cell esophageal cancer in Black compared with White men is due to type of alcoholic beverage consumed or to other qualitative differences in alcohol consumption, we conducted a population-based case-control study with 373 males diagnosed with squamous-cell esophageal cancer (124 Whites and 249 Blacks) and 1,364 male controls (750 Whites and 614 Blacks) from three geographic areas in the United States. Included were all histologically confirmed cases newly diagnosed from 1 August 1986 through 30 April 1989, among White and Black men aged 30 to 79 years. Risks varied to some extent according to type of alcohol used, with beer a stronger contributor in Whites, and wine and liquor stronger contributors in Blacks. However, most of the differences in the odds ratios by type of alcohol and race were eliminated after controlling for average weekly amount of total alcohol consumed. Thus, while alcohol use in all forms is an important risk factor for squamous-cell esophageal cancer in Whites and Blacks, type of alcoholic beverage used does not appear to account for the racial differences in incidence.


Subject(s)
Alcohol Drinking/adverse effects , Alcoholic Beverages/classification , Black or African American/statistics & numerical data , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/etiology , Esophageal Neoplasms/etiology , White People/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aged , Alcohol Drinking/ethnology , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/ethnology , Case-Control Studies , Esophageal Neoplasms/ethnology , Georgia , Humans , Incidence , Male , Michigan , Middle Aged , New Jersey , Odds Ratio
18.
Cancer Causes Control ; 8(4): 610-4, 1997 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9242477

ABSTRACT

In the United States, the incidence rates of multiple myeloma in Blacks are more than twice those in Whites, but the etiology of this cancer is poorly understood. A population-based case-control interview study of 571 subjects (365 White, 206 Black) with multiple myeloma and 2,122 controls (1,155 White, 967 Black) living in three areas of the United States (Georgia, Michigan, New Jersey) offered the opportunity to investigate the relationship with smoking and alcohol drinking and to evaluate whether these factors might contribute to the excess risk of multiple myeloma in Blacks. For Blacks and Whites of either gender, there were no significantly elevated risks associated with ever use of cigarettes or alcoholic beverages and no consistent patterns with either intensity or duration of use. These data support previous studies indicating that smoking and drinking are not related causally to the risk of multiple myeloma, and thus cannot account for the racial disparity in incidence rates.


Subject(s)
Alcohol Drinking/adverse effects , Black or African American , Multiple Myeloma/ethnology , Multiple Myeloma/etiology , Smoking/adverse effects , White People , Adult , Case-Control Studies , Female , Georgia , Humans , Incidence , Male , Michigan , New Jersey , Population Surveillance , Risk Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires
19.
Am J Epidemiol ; 143(7): 692-7, 1996 Apr 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8651231

ABSTRACT

Prostate cancer is the most common malignancy in US men (more than 165,000 cases per annum) and occurs substantially more frequently in blacks than in whites. The causes of this disease are, however, poorly understood. Alcohol consumption, which has been clearly related to malignancies of the upper aerodigestive tract, may also increase risk of cancer at other sites, including the prostate. The authors investigated alcohol use as a risk factor for prostate cancer among US blacks and whites. A population-based, case-control study was carried out among 981 men (479 blacks and 502 whites) with pathologically confirmed prostate cancer diagnosed between August 1, 1986, and April 30, 1989, and 1,315 controls (594 blacks and 721 whites) who resided in Atlanta, Georgia; Detroit, Michigan; and 10 counties in New Jersey, geographic areas covered by three population-based cancer registries. In-person interviews elicited information on alcohol use and other factors possibly related to prostate cancer. Compared with never-users, risk for prostate cancer increased with amount of alcohol drunk (chi2 (trend), p < 0.001), with significantly elevated risks seen for those who had 22-56 drinks per week (odds ratio = 1.4; 95% confidence interval 1.0-1.8) and 57 or more drinks per week (odds ratio = 1.9; 95% confidence interval 1.3-2.7). The finding was consistent among blacks (chi2 (trend), p < 0.01) and whites (chi2 (trend), p < 0.05), and among young and old subjects; it was not restricted to a specific type of alcoholic beverage. In this first large study among US blacks and whites, increased risk for prostate cancer was associated with increased alcohol use. The risk was similar for whites and blacks and could not be attributed to tobacco use or to a number of other potential confounders.


Subject(s)
Alcohol Drinking/epidemiology , Black or African American/statistics & numerical data , Prostatic Neoplasms/epidemiology , White People/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aged , Alcohol Drinking/adverse effects , Case-Control Studies , Chi-Square Distribution , Confidence Intervals , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Odds Ratio , Prostatic Neoplasms/etiology , Risk Factors , United States/epidemiology
20.
Epidemiology ; 7(2): 131-9, 1996 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8834551

ABSTRACT

We utilized data from two Kaiser Permanente medical care programs to evaluate risks of hematopoietic and lymphoproliferative (HLP) malignancies after use of 14 common medications. The subjects were adult cases of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) (N = 94), multiple myeloma (N = 159), and leukemia (N = 257) and individually matched controls (N = 695). Abstractors reviewed medical records and recorded medication notations. Using a minimum 5-year exposure lag between first notation and malignancy diagnosis, the risk of NHL was greater among plan members who were prescribed amphetamines [odds ratio (OR) = 2.2; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.1-4.8], lidocaine (OR = 2.6; 95% CI = 1.2-5.5), and meprobamate (OR = 2.1; 95% CI = 1.03-4.3). The risk of NHL rose with increasing number of medical record notations for amphetamines; however, there was no association with number of notations for lidocaine or meprobamate. The odds ratio for total leukemia was decreased among patients who took chloramphenicol (OR = 0.4; 95% CI = 0.2-0.97).


Subject(s)
Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions , Leukemia/chemically induced , Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin/chemically induced , Multiple Myeloma/chemically induced , Adult , Aged , Amphetamines/administration & dosage , Amphetamines/adverse effects , California/epidemiology , Case-Control Studies , Chloramphenicol/administration & dosage , Chloramphenicol/adverse effects , Confidence Intervals , Drug Prescriptions/statistics & numerical data , Female , Health Maintenance Organizations/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Leukemia/epidemiology , Lidocaine/administration & dosage , Lidocaine/adverse effects , Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin/epidemiology , Male , Meprobamate/administration & dosage , Meprobamate/adverse effects , Middle Aged , Multiple Myeloma/epidemiology , Odds Ratio , Risk
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...