Coaxial 3D bioprinting of tri-polymer scaffolds to improve the osteogenic and vasculogenic potential of cells in co-culture models.

The crosstalk between osteoblasts and endothelial cells is critical for bone vascularization and regeneration. Here, we used a coaxial 3D bioprinting method to directly print an osteon-like structure by depositing angiogenic and osteogenic bioinks from the core and shell regions of the coaxial nozzle, respectively. The bioinks were made up of gelatin, gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA), alginate, and hydroxyapatite (HAp) nanoparticles and were loaded with human umbilical vascular endothelial cells (HUVECs) and osteoblasts (MC3T3) in the core and shell regions, respectively. Conventional monoaxial 3D bioprinting was used as a control method, where the hydrogels, HAp nanoparticles, MC3T3 cells, and HUVECs were all mixed in one bioink and printed from the core nozzle. As a result, the bioprinted scaffolds were composed of cell-laden fibers with either a core-shell or homogenous structure, providing a non-contact (indirect) or contact (direct) co-culture of MC3T3 cells and HUVECs, respectively. Both structures supported the 3D culture of HUVECs and osteoblasts over a long period. The scaffolds also supported the expression of osteogenic and angiogenic factors. However, the gene expression was significantly higher for the core-shell structure than the homogeneous structure due to the well-defined distribution of osteoblasts and endothelial cells and the formation of vessel-like structures in the co-culture system. Our results indicated that the coaxial bioprinting technique, with the ability to create a non-contact co-culture of cells, can provide a more efficient bioprinting strategy for printing highly vascularized and bioactive bone structures.

Recent advances in 3D bioprinting of musculoskeletal tissues.

The musculoskeletal system is essential for maintaining posture, protecting organs, facilitating locomotion, and regulating various cellular and metabolic functions. Injury to this system due to trauma or wear is common, and severe damage may require surgery to restore function and prevent further harm. Autografts are the current gold standard for the replacement of lost or damaged tissues. However, these grafts are constrained by limited supply and donor site morbidity. Allografts, xenografts, and alloplastic materials represent viable alternatives, but each of these methods also has its own problems and limitations. Technological advances in three-dimensional (3D) printing and its biomedical adaptation, 3D bioprinting, have the potential to provide viable, autologous tissue-like constructs that can be used to repair musculoskeletal defects. Though bioprinting is currently unable to develop mature, implantable tissues, it can pattern cells in 3D constructs with features facilitating maturation and vascularization. Further advances in the field may enable the manufacture of constructs that can mimic native tissues in complexity, spatial heterogeneity, and ultimately, clinical utility. This review studies the use of 3D bioprinting for engineering bone, cartilage, muscle, tendon, ligament, and their interface tissues. Additionally, the current limitations and challenges in the field are discussed and the prospects for future progress are highlighted.