Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Appl Environ Microbiol ; 77(17): 6225-32, 2011 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21742913

ABSTRACT

A new method was developed for the rapid and sensitive detection of viable Legionella pneumophila. The method combines specific immunofluorescence (IF) staining using monoclonal antibodies with a bacterial viability marker (ChemChrome V6 cellular esterase activity marker) by means of solid-phase cytometry (SPC). IF methods were applied to the detection and enumeration of both the total and viable L. pneumophila cells in water samples. The sensitivity of the IF methods coupled to SPC was 34 cells liter(-1), and the reproducibility was good, with the coefficient of variation generally falling below 30%. IF methods were applied to the enumeration of total and viable L. pneumophila cells in 46 domestic hot water samples as well as in cooling tower water and natural water samples, such as thermal spring water and freshwater samples. Comparison with standard plate counts showed that (i) the total direct counts were always higher than the plate counts and (ii) the viable counts were higher than or close to the plate counts. With domestic hot waters, when the IF assay was combined with the viability test, SPC detected up to 3.4 × 10(3) viable but nonculturable L. pneumophila cells per liter. These direct IF methods could be a powerful tool for high-frequency monitoring of domestic hot waters or for investigating the occurrence of viable L. pneumophila in both man-made water systems and environmental water samples.


Subject(s)
Bacterial Load/methods , Legionella pneumophila/isolation & purification , Legionella pneumophila/physiology , Water Microbiology , Fluorescent Antibody Technique/methods , Legionella pneumophila/cytology , Microbial Viability , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity , Staining and Labeling/methods
2.
J Appl Microbiol ; 111(2): 499-510, 2011 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21624019

ABSTRACT

AIMS: This study was designed to evaluate the usefulness of quantification by real-time PCR as a management tool to monitor concentrations of Legionella spp. and Legionella pneumophila in industrial cooling systems and its ability to anticipate culture trends by the French standard method (AFNOR T90-431). METHODS AND RESULTS: Quantifications of Legionella bacteria were achieved by both methods on samples from nine cooling systems with different water qualities. Proportion of positive samples for L. pneumophila quantified by PCR was clearly lower in deionized or river waters submitted to a biocide treatment than in raw river waters, while positive samples for Legionella spp. were quantified for almost all the samples. For some samples containing PCR inhibitors, high quantification limits (up to 4·80 × 10(5) GU l(-1) ) did not allow us to quantify L. pneumophila, when they were quantified by culture. Finally, the monitoring of concentrations of L. pneumophila by both methods showed similar trends for 57-100% of the samples. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that, if some methodological steps designed to reduce inhibitory problems and thus decrease the quantification limits, could be developed to quantify Legionella in complex waters, the real-time PCR could be a valuable complementary tool to monitor the evolution of L. pneumophila concentrations. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: This study shows the possibility of using real-time PCR to monitor L. pneumophila proliferations in cooling systems and the importance to adapt nucleic acid extraction and purification protocols to raw waters.


Subject(s)
Legionella pneumophila/isolation & purification , Legionella/isolation & purification , Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Water Microbiology , Water Supply , Colony Count, Microbial , DNA, Bacterial/genetics , Disinfectants , Environmental Monitoring/methods , Legionella/genetics , Legionella pneumophila/genetics , Limit of Detection , Rivers/microbiology
3.
J Appl Microbiol ; 103(3): 700-10, 2007 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17714404

ABSTRACT

AIMS: To test Fountain Flow Cytometry (FFC) for the rapid and sensitive detection of Naegleria lovaniensis amoebae (an analogue for Naegleria fowleri) in natural river waters. METHODS AND RESULTS: Samples were incubated with one of two fluorescent labels to facilitate detection: ChemChrome V6, a viability indicator, and an R-phycoerytherin (RPE) immunolabel to detect N. lovaniensis specifically. The resulting aqueous sample was passed as a stream in front of a light-emitting diode, which excited the fluorescent labels. The fluorescence was detected with a digital camera as the sample flowed toward the imager. Detections of N. lovaniensis were made in inoculated samples of natural water from eight rivers in France and the United States. FFC enumeration yielded results that are consistent with other counting methods: solid-phase cytometry, flow cytometry, and hemocytometry, down to concentrations of 0.06 amoebae ml(-1), using a flow rate of 15 ml min(-1). CONCLUSIONS: This study supports the efficacy of using FFC for the detection of viable protozoa in natural waters and indicates that use of RPE illuminated at 530 nm and detected at 585 nm provides a satisfactory means of attenuating background. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: Because of the severe global public health issues with drinking water and sanitation, there is an urgent need to develop a technique for the real-time detection of viable pathogens in environmental samples at low concentrations. FFC addresses this need.


Subject(s)
Flow Cytometry/methods , Naegleria/isolation & purification , Rivers/parasitology , Animals , Culture Media , Flow Cytometry/instrumentation , Fluorescent Antibody Technique/methods , Fluorescent Dyes/analysis , France , Phycoerythrin/analysis , Reproducibility of Results , United States , Water Pollution/analysis
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...