Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
1.
Ugeskr Laeger ; 153(29): 2063-5, 1991 Jul 15.
Article in Danish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1858189

ABSTRACT

Twenty-three patients subjected to arthrotomy of the knee were in a double-blind trial randomly allocated to either: 1) Indomethacin 100 mg (Confortid) administered as an enema immediately before induction of anaesthesia and repeated morning and evening for the next two days, or: b) a placebo. The patients' demand for postoperative pain treatment were registered. Survival analysis was applied to the time passed from recovery from anaesthesia until patients first asked for postoperative pain treatment. A significant difference was found (p less than 0.05). The indomethacin treated group required significantly less postoperative pain treatment than did the placebo group. 36% of the patients in the indomethacin group had no additional pain treatment during the two days of observation. Indomethacin as an enema proved to be an easy and effective way of reducing postoperative pain.


Subject(s)
Enema , Indomethacin/administration & dosage , Knee Joint/surgery , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Adult , Double-Blind Method , Humans , Menisci, Tibial/surgery , Middle Aged
2.
Br J Anaesth ; 63(3): 340-2, 1989 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2803892

ABSTRACT

Forty-eight patients scheduled to undergo spinal anaesthesia were allocated to three groups of 16 each according to ASA classification I-II-III. Each patient received a fluid load of 7 ml kg-1 and either ephedrine 12.5 mg i.v. and 37.5 mg i.m., or placebo. Twelve patients in the placebo groups developed a maximal decrease in mean arterial pressure exceeding 20%. Five of these (one in ASA II and four in ASA III) developed a decrease exceeding 33% and required treatment. In ASA risk group III, all patients in the placebo group had a decrease in mean arterial pressure exceeding 20%; in 50% of these patients, the decrease exceeded 33%. We conclude that prophylactic ephedrine is desirable for spinal anaesthesia, especially in ASA III patients.


Subject(s)
Anesthesia, Spinal , Ephedrine/therapeutic use , Premedication , Anesthesia, Spinal/adverse effects , Blood Pressure/drug effects , Double-Blind Method , Drug Evaluation , Humans , Hypotension/prevention & control , Intraoperative Complications/prevention & control , Risk Factors , Severity of Illness Index
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...